Young White girl mysteriously dies after conjuring spirit of Papa Legba..

[MMS]

Japheth Son of Noah - Amazing Bible Timeline with World History

Where did Japheth and his descendants live?

Japheth is usually thought of as the “Father of the Europeans” and the “Father of the Japhetic Race” equating the Japhetic nations to Europeans. He is known to be the ancestor of all Indo-European nations. The majority of his descendants are situated in north western regions like Anatolia and Aegean. However, there are also assumptions that Japheth is the “Father of the Asian or Mongoloid People.”

After what happened to the Tower of Babel, the Japhetic race went to the east of Europe and north of Asia to propagate. The Bible phrase that states they migrated to the “isles of the Gentiles” is generally thought to be the Greek isles but some consider that it refers to the islands in Asia and the Pacific Islands. His sons and their people started to multiply in the mountains of Taurus and Amanus. Then they dwelt to the lands of presently known as the Mediterranean Russia, Asia, and the Americas. A fraction of them stayed in Europe until the conquest of the Shemite tribes that drove them to the northern areas. Soon after they were forced further to the east of Asia when the Shemite tribes invaded and occupied the entire South of Europe.

Early Greeks have their deity, Iapetos or Iapetus, the son of heaven and earth and the father of many nations, whereas, India worshipped Pra-Japati, the sun and perceived Lord of Creation. And later on the Greeks have Iupater then Jupiter while the Saxons have their Sceaf. All of these are different versions of the Japheth’s name. The ancient Irish Celts and Britons also outlined their royal houses from Japheth.

map for reference to biblical genealogies

note the rivers in Cush there is a reason all the nations in that area are rich as hell even today. Ancient rich

note gulf of aden name

 

[Bawon Samedi]

another great mystery arising in genetics are when they try to follow mother-based mitochondrial DNA that at most is only 6000 years old (mitochondrial eve)

Ehhhh... This is where we disagree. Mitochondria Eve is actually around 200k which arose in Africa i.e modern Humans. Heck Africa is also where consciousness in humans emerged.

they are trying to explain this away but its becoming more and more difficult

The more I read your posts I'm realizing more you are on the side against mainstream materialistic darwinist science. I assumed you were playing devil's advocate. But yes, shyts getting more and more difficult for them to explain away. Another blow is the fact that African ancestry has been discovered in Neanderthals. I'll explain that one later.

in fact what I believe and what many see is that genes havent become more robust but rather weaker and fragmented with each successive generation

natural selection and adaptation truthfully work in reverse

Yep... Like the graph showed we are receiving LESS genes yet are becoming more conscious each generation, why?

 

[Rollie Forbes]

This shyt was lowkey creepy.
Especially them chords in the background.

They need to do more films visualizing the African indigenous sacred cosmos with the black american experience. shyt would be a hit.

*SPOILER ALERT* This is a scene from later in Crossroads (a classic movie, btw) when Legba makes an appearance. This is my favorite portrayal of him.

 

[Geek Nasty]

As an oldhead I can't stand these Twitter news posts. I can't tell WHAT THE fukk happened skipping around from post to post. I just want to see a proper article or detailed post not a bunch of links

• Who the fukk is this bytch?
• Who the fukk is Papa Legba?
• Why am i staring at Jordans and a voodoo doll?

I feel like I just showed up on the block after shyt went down and I got to ask 20 differetn people what they saw just to find out it was nothing but some ratchet drama I didn't care about in teh first place

 

[MMS]

Ehhhh... This is where we disagree. Mitochondria Eve is actually around 200k which arose in Africa i.e modern Humans. Heck Africa is also where consciousness in humans emerged.


The more I read your posts I'm realizing more you are on the side against mainstream materialistic darwinist science. I assumed you were playing devil's advocate. But yes, shyts getting more and more difficult for them to explain away. Another blow is the fact that African ancestry has been discovered in Neanderthals. I'll explain that one later.





Yep... Like the graph showed we are receiving LESS genes yet are becoming more conscious each generation, why?

the problem with the 200k years is that the magnetic field of the earth at most is only 15000 years old.

many of the ways they are dating things are flawed and have no agreement. Thusly ive started discarding the dating methods. Its a long and convoluted reason but it becomes clear when you try to find agreement with them

the only reason they use the long year periods is based on early assumptions of deep time starting with Darwins Descent of Man and Origin of Species

if you can suspend disbelief you'll see the earth may in fact be only between 6000-10000 years old. IE egyptian artifiacts are now known to be older than many mesopotamian ones which is in opposition to "modern" archaeologists and more in line with religious texts (Nimrod - a Cushyte - conquering the known world before the Tower of Babel incident)

edit - can consciousness be defined by physical means? I dont think so

in essence i dont believe consciousness and will exists in the physical plane. That is just my opinion though

there is a very real difference between what the flesh feels and senses and what the internal consciousness perceives

 

[Bawon Samedi]

the problem with the 200k years is that the magnetic field of the earth at most is only 15000 years old.

many of the ways they are dating things are flawed and have no agreement. Thusly ive started discarding the dating methods. Its a long and convoluted reason but it becomes clear when you try to find agreement with them

the only reason they use the long year periods is based on early assumptions of deep time starting with Darwins Descent of Man and Origin of Species

if you can suspend disbelief you'll see the earth may in fact be only between 6000-10000 years old. IE egyptian artifiacts are now known to be older than many mesopotamian ones which is in opposition to "modern" archaeologists and more in line with religious texts (Nimrod conquering the known world before the Tower of Babel incident)

edit - can consciousness be defined by physical means? I dont think so

in essence i dont believe consciousness and will exists in the physical plane. That is just my opinion though

there is a very real difference between what the flesh feels and senses and what the internal consciousness perceives

I'm not just talking about fossils? What about Haplogroup L which is dated way prior to 6000 years? 6000-10000 years is not enough time for these different lineages to have emerge. Its impossible. Evolution and Christianity don't even have to contradict each other. The issue is modern science only looking at things in terms if materialism. Either way I find it impossible for all these prehistoric events to have happened from 6000-10000 years ago.

As for the magnetic field being only 150k years old that's something new to me. On the AE artifacts there have been many archaeologists that argued AE is older.

 

[50CentStan]

In 2020 and people still believe spirts are fake. Until they murder your ass in your sleep. Do not mess with that stuff brehs. It's very real.

 

[MMS]

I'm not just talking about fossils? What about Haplogroup L which is dated way prior to 6000 years? 6000-10000 years is not enough time for these different lineages to have emerge. Its impossible. Evolution and Christianity don't even have to contradict each other. The issue is modern science only looking at things in terms if materialism. Either way I find it impossible for all these prehistoric events to have happened from 6000-10000 years ago.

As for the magnetic field being only 150k years old that's something new to me. On the AE artifacts there have been many archaeologists that argued AE is older.

the issue with the lineages arises from the deluge

if the flood is true it would mean that "humans" existed for almost 1500 years and procreated creating new groupings of genes all the way down to th day of the flood. From whence 8 people then would have only existed afterwards

peep this (difficult to read but squint towards the middle)
The human olfactory receptor gene family

there are exactly three distinct branches they still cant explain that either

ill have to find the video but a creationist adjusted this to not include apes (evolutionists still link us)

 

[Bawon Samedi]

In 2020 and people still believe spirts are fake. Until they murder your ass in your sleep. Do not mess with that stuff brehs. It's very real.

Just wait until mainstream science breaks away with its materialistic/Darwinist roots. A lot of people are going to be in for a surprise.

 

[Bawon Samedi]

the issue with the lineages arises from the deluge

if the flood is true it would mean that "humans" existed for almost 1500 years and procreated creating new groupings of genes all the way down to th day of the flood. From whence 8 people then would have only existed afterwards

But first it would have to be proven true...

peep this (difficult to read but squint towards the middle)
The human olfactory receptor gene family

there are exactly three distinct branches they still cant explain that either

ill have to find the video but a creationist adjusted this to not include apes (evolutionists still link us)

Interesting. Will look into this. But when I mean "lineages" I mean haplogroups which are human ancestry markers.

 

[MMS]

But first it would have to be proven true...


Interesting. Will look into this. But when I mean "lineages" I mean haplogroups which are human ancestry markers.

this is a weird theory but the more i look into this its actually plausible


its long but its quite interesting i must say

there are other diluvian theories but the best place to start is in studying the grand canyon and the fact many of its striations indicate cataclysm as opposed to millions of years of settling sediments.

most scientists outright reject the flood as it would make them recognize god. Its hard to find true scientific theories about it other than a few private religious universities

 

[videogamestashbox.com]

​

 

[Bawon Samedi]

this is a weird theory but the more i look into this its actually plausible


its long but its quite interesting i must say

there are other diluvian theories but the best place to start is in studying the grand canyon and the fact many of its striations indicate cataclysm as opposed to millions of years of settling sediments.

most scientists outright reject the flood as it would make them recognize god. Its hard to find true scientific theories about it other than a few private religious universities

I'll give it a look and give it my own judgement. This idea of the world being younger than what we been told is a total different story for me. But.... I'll give it a look. Meanwhile people who are serious should give this book a read.

 

[MMS]

I'll give it a look and give it my own judgement. This idea of the world being younger than what we been told is a total different story for me. But.... I'll give it a look. Meanwhile people who are serious should give this book a read.

darwin might have been the worst thing to happen to science tbh

shiet they found soft marrow tissue in dinosaur bones that are supposed to be 300,000,000 years old. shyt should be utterly calcified but instead is preserved. They all going down

 

[Bawon Samedi]

darwin might have been the worst thing to happen to science tbh

He was he helped further separate spirituality from science which was never the case in "indignous cultures" or ancient cultures like Nile Valley civilizations. See the Dogon for example. But whats worse is that his followers have converted many into their religion. Even people of African descent.

shiet they found soft marrow tissue in dinosaur bones that are supposed to be 300,000,000 years old. shyt should be utterly calcified but instead is preserved. They all going down

Again the whole Earth being younger than it is goes in another direction. Either way this is what they say:

The controversial discovery of 68-million-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex finally has a physical explanation. According to new research, iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay.

Controversial T. Rex Soft Tissue Find Finally Explained | Live Science