At least she wasn't hit by another trainImagine being her dad and knowing she got a train ran on her, then kicked out of the car and hit by another car
At least she wasn't hit by another trainImagine being her dad and knowing she got a train ran on her, then kicked out of the car and hit by another car
She was 19, breh. If the 28 year old was provided her alcohol or allowed her to consume alcohol in his vehicle...They also didn't force her to consume alcohol either
All those symptoms and side effects. It's very clear people drink to lower their inhibitionsOf course, the guy who rapes women at gun point would believe a woman with .319 BAC is even capable of consent
I know most TLR posters are borderline retarded and hate women like Hitler hated Jews, so they're not even capable or willing to try and understand how absurd that number is when it comes to intoxication. That's literally alcohol poisoning levels.
All of them deserve to go to jail
Exploring Blood Alcohol Levels (BAC) - Pinelands Recovery Center
Understand blood alcohol levels and what happens at each stage can keep you from drinking too much and endangering yourself or others.www.pinelandsrecovery.com
The Impact of Blood Alcohol Levels
As an individual’s blood alcohol level increases, so do their impairments. To know when your blood alcohol concentration may be too high, it helps to understand how levels of alcohol in blood can affect you.
- 0.01 – 0.03% – This is the lowest measurable blood alcohol level. At this mild level of intoxication, you may feel slightly warmer and more relaxed.
- 0.04 – 0.06% – Your behavior will become exaggerated (speaking louder, gesturing more), you may begin to lose control of small muscles (resulting in things like blurrier vision), and your judgment will be impaired.
- 0.07 – 0.09% – Mild impairment of speech, vision, coordination and reaction times make it dangerous for you to drive. In the United States (aside from Utah), it is illegal to drive at or above .08% BAC; you will test as legally impaired at this blood alcohol level if you’re 21 or older.
- 0.10 – 0.12% – Obvious physical impairment and loss of judgment. Speech may be slurred.
- 0.13 – 0.15% – At this point, your blood alcohol level is quite high. You’ll be affected by blurred vision, loss of coordination and balance, and potentially dysphoria (anxiety or restlessness).
- 0.16 – 0.19% – The term “sloppy drunk” applies. Dysphoria will become stronger, and nausea may occur. Walking becomes difficult, and you may fall and hurt yourself.
- 0.20 – 0.29% – You’ll feel dazed, confused, and disoriented. Balance and muscle control have deteriorated, and you may need help walking. You may not notice if you injure yourself, as feelings of pain are numbed. Nausea and vomiting are likely, and an impaired gag reflex could cause you to choke on your own vomit. Blackouts occur at this blood alcohol level.
- 0.30 – 0.39% – This is a dangerously high blood alcohol concentration. Your potential for death increases, as does your heart rate and the likelihood of unconsciousness. You may experience irregular breathing and loss of bladder control.
- .40% and over – Your heart or breathing may stop. A coma or death by respiratory failure is likely.
I don't think you guys fully comprehend the law
If a person is drunk, you cannot have sex with them because they can't consent.. It doesn't matter where they got the liquor, drugs, medicine, etc that impaired them. It does not matter if you were the reason they got drunk. It barely matter if you were drinking together...
The moment a person says "I wasn't in my right mind and therefore could not give consent, even if I did..." the accused is in fukking trouble. And admitting you had sex with them is your first problem. And proving they was drunk is your second... If you was there witnessing a crime, you less fukked, but still fukked. Same as "just" sitting in a getaway car.
All the other shyt, WHILE I AGREE, isn't going to matter. You leave drunk people alone... We ain't 16 no more.. We know this shyt
yeah it does matter. She didn’t die of rape. She died from being drunk. If she bought her own drinks( fake ID or otherwise) you didn’t aid in the cause of her murder. She was alive when you left her. They tried to get her home.I don't think you guys fully comprehend the law
If a person is drunk, you cannot have sex with them because they can't consent.. It doesn't matter where they got the liquor, drugs, medicine, etc that impaired them. It does not matter if you were the reason they got drunk. It barely matter if you were drinking together...
The moment a person says "I wasn't in my right mind and therefore could not give consent, even if I did..." the accused is in fukking trouble. And admitting you had sex with them is your first problem. And proving they was drunk is your second... If you was there witnessing a crime, you less fukked, but still fukked. Same as "just" sitting in a getaway car.
All the other shyt, WHILE I AGREE, isn't going to matter. You leave drunk people alone... We ain't 16 no more.. We know this shyt
Bro... I have a son that's 11.. If you think he don't already know about women, messing with them, what not to do and what to do.... You are sadly mistaken..The people in the story are about as close to 16 as you can get. One is even a minor at 17. Of course WE know that,but why are you expecting them too.
The bolded was never said in this case. You sound very confident when I dont know if there is actually any precedent for this. Usually in cases where a woman is drunk,she comes foward and says the bolded. Are you saying we can now put rape cases on people,on the behalf of others,who we THINK are too drunk or my have been coerced?
They are treating the girl like she was raped and then murdeered. And her murder is the only reason she cant say she was raped. I dont know what the girl would have said had she lived. Thats much different from someone raping and killing to keep the woman from filing a rape charge. But they are treating it the same imo.
No it doesn't lol.. You talking how you want it to be, and I'm telling you the law.. The law DOES NOT CAREyeah it does matter. She didn’t die of rape. She died from being drunk. If she bought her own drinks( fake ID or otherwise) you didn’t aid in the cause of her murder. She was alive when you left her. They tried to get her home.
Two dudes didn’t have sex with her so how are you charging them with rape? Unless you know they purposefully gave her an underage girl alcohol ( which strangely hasn’t been established) then delinquency of a minor is the most you can charge two of them with.
its been confirmed the dudes asked for her consent. They didn’t do hold her down and force her. To a jury, you think that wouldn’t be the differ between how you charge someone? You think a 17 and 18 understand alcohol inebriation levels?
im not saying these dudes are upstanding citizens but I think (depending on the alcohol part of the story) a decent defense of them to lesser charges is definitely possible.
It’s Louisiana so I’m sure there’s some kind of law about not allowing underage sexual activity to happen on your property from the 1960s they can use.Then I don't see how those two dudes can be charged with rape. If they didn't hold her down or otherwise actively participate in the act then the charges make no sense against them. I don't think they have a duty to intervene to stop an act so this is further proof that more facts need to come out before people jump to conclusions.
But let me start over... Cause maybe YOU are the one who doesn't have the facts... I'll point out where you fukked up atBro... I have a son that's 11.. If you think he don't already know about women, messing with them, what not to do and what to do.... You are sadly mistaken..
There is no way on earth that at 17-18-19-20-21, I thought it was cool to fukk drunk bytches.. It's not 1964, we have the info and technology and history to KNOW what the outcome is going to be
Bro... I have a son that's 11.. If you think he don't already know about women, messing with them, what not to do and what to do.... You are sadly mistaken..
There is no way on earth that at 17-18-19-20-21, I thought it was cool to fukk drunk bytches.. It's not 1964, we have the info and technology and history to KNOW what the outcome is going to be
No it doesn't lol.. You talking how you want it to be, and I'm telling you the law.. The law DOES NOT CARE
If you are sitting in the car with 4 people and 2 are raping a woman in the back, you are getting fukking charges... nikka you driving and riding in the rape car..
Y'all must of woke up thinking you white and rich.. I hope y'all teaching your children better than y'all acting in here or they'll be the next dumb nikkas in jail. 28 fukking years old and don't know about drinking, fukking and driving around with drunk under 21 year olds..
Y'all sound crazy
They fukking idiots... But ignorance of the law isn't going to save any black children in americaHow can you say no way they dont know. When you see everyday on thecoli that grown men dont fully understand consent/coercion laws.?
Dont say it aint 1964,its not even 2010,the rules and accountability scale have certainly changed#WeCanAllBeCosby
Good job on your part btw,but your giving people too much credit
They fukking idiots... But ignorance of the law isn't going to save any black children in america
Well they can't charge her for that now can they? And they also wouldn't because her level was 4 times the limit and they admitted to asking her while drunk... So once again...........Getting charges and getting charged with rape aren’t the same thing. They are in trouble. No one is saying otherwise.
involuntary manslaughter and murder aren’t the same. Just saying they getting charged doesn‘t make you Judge Brown of the Coli.
The boys themselves may have been drunk(since their alcohol levels weren’t tested) it’s a grey area. So you now have a 19 year old having sex with underage boys.