Weren't both sides armed? Oh you meant civilians.This thread is proof why you keep your guns A lot of innocent deaths could've been avoided if they were just armed.
This thread is proof why you keep your guns A lot of innocent deaths could've been avoided if they were just armed.
I've been thinking about this recently...I'm far from a gun nut but it makes sense that some people hold semi automatic weapons just in case
I’d say the Rape Of Nanking is the absolute pinnacle of human savagery.
Slavery wasn’t an “event” you idiot. Slavery was an ongoing organized institution that-...wait a minute...why am I explaining myself to YOU of all posters?Slavery was Cac
Slavery wasn’t an “event” you idiot. Slavery was an ongoing organized institution that-...wait a minute...why am I explaining myself to YOU of all posters?
fukk out my face
Perhaps. However, with the weapons we have today...If a WW3 happens..I don't think the savagery will top WW2. I'd be expecting a lot of bombs and aerial/naval battles but not as much ground combat unless in very remote proxy locations or after the bulk of the damage was done guerilla style against resistant civilians. I find a hard time imagining tons of troops being on foot and able to clash with the emotional vitriol that lead to what was seen in WW2.
MAD has largely kept big conflicts like that from happening.