Lot of broke, bitter losers in this thread...
Keep believing in the myth of free pvssy.
Big Pimpin' right, brehs?
Tinder chicks come straight to my condo. No money spent!
Lot of broke, bitter losers in this thread...
Keep believing in the myth of free pvssy.
Big Pimpin' right, brehs?
I agree with everything but bold. If you don't have a certain baseline of stuff you shouldn't be dating IMO. You usually get comfortable and stop grinding once they get with somebody. I'm not saying you have to be rich either just basics at least (car if needed, apt/house, steady job) but if you not close to where you want to be and or don't have the discipline to improve while in a relationship which being honest if you're slacking in money you might not have you should probably wait. I also think this advice sounds good while people are college aged but if you're mid 20's and up it don't sound as cool talking about building with somebody. You should already be on your way towards building something and if you're not put dating on the back burner for a bit.It's not about whether you can afford it. Just because I can afford to light my cigar with a $100 bill doesn't mean I should. It's about tricking or treating. Spending $250 on a regular date is tricking, spending $250 should be a treat for a special occasion. It's just not sustainable in the long term. Do the math - 250 a date times 4 dates a month = 12,000 a year. You could buy a car, put a downpayment on a house, start a business etc.
And I can't agree that you shouldn't date unless you got money. The best way to get your money up is to have someone to share expenses with so broke dudes should get with broke women and save money together. And it's always better to build with someone. At least you know they want you for you and not your money.
I'd be lying if I said this wasn't the truthnikkas be blowing all that doe on these hoes
and can't get their mom's a good mother's day card
that 2 for 20 deal has gotten me p*ssy a few times
It's not about whether you can afford it. Just because I can afford to light my cigar with a $100 bill doesn't mean I should. It's about tricking or treating. Spending $250 on a regular date is tricking, spending $250 should be a treat for a special occasion. It's just not sustainable in the long term. Do the math - 250 a date times 4 dates a month = 12,000 a year. You could buy a car, put a downpayment on a house, start a business etc.
And I can't agree that you shouldn't date unless you got money. The best way to get your money up is to have someone to share expenses with so broke dudes should get with broke women and save money together. And it's always better to build with someone. At least you know they want you for you and not your money.
if you're that decent and responsible, a moderately priced date every once in awhile shouldn't break the bank.It doesn't make sense to price out a lot of future deadbeats when it comes at the cost of decent/financially responsible men.
If you had 1M+ you wouldnt have to spend anything. Girls would be down to come over to your fly condo or house for cold leftover pizza and dikk.Even if my net worth is $1M+, I would still refuse off of principle to spend $250 on a first date with some woman. Quite frankly, I wouldn't even spend $100.
Although I'm not broke, established in my career, and living in DC, I cap my first date expenses at $50 (the maximum).
yeah man, i'm sure women are creaming over dominos and netflix
you nikkas twisting natural male behavior into simping is already doing damage. i know y'all fear the day black women start valuing themselves to expect more out of men.
if you're that decent and responsible, a moderately priced date every once in awhile shouldn't break the bank.