People spent the last 6 pages telling you, but you sat there with your hands over your ears basically going LA LALALA LAALALALA sotrying to act like you'll listen to reason.
Let's be real here. You're an XBOX stan. I get that. And you feel some kind of way about these Nintendo games getting better scores than XBOX1 games. That's all this is. People could sit here and explain for another 100 pages, you're going to play dumb because you didn't make this thread for any kind of serious discussion. You made it to defend MS's honor, above any kind of logic or rational thought.
Instead of wondering why these games ain't innovative why don't you get innovative with your posts, and stop asking the same shyt over and over, when you know damn well you aren't going to see their point of view no matter what? Nobody is sitting here even remotely entertaining the thought that you're unbiased. We know exactly how you'll respond, and why.
I mean....you just said every Mario game has played the same since "Mario 64". That's like saying you only need to ever read one book because they all have pages and words.
Fred.
@hexagram23 I just Re-read the last six pages and not one single person has explained what makes Mario innovative.
. It's the exact same thing really, the same game with better graphics. The reason why you would give Nintendo games higher scores because you know what you are expecting and they usually do more than that. With something like xbox 1 or ps4, its killzone, forza, COD. Nothing they did is impressive at all, good graphics are not impressive. Different games are impressive. Minecraft is more impressive than all of the next gen drops.
What is the real difference between the rehashing of things like Forza, Battlefield, COD, Killzone etc. and the rehashing of the concept of mario? The new mario looks really good
really?
What is the real difference between the rehashing of things like Forza, Battlefield, COD, Killzone etc. and the rehashing of the concept of mario? The new mario looks really good
at trying to act like they're comparable. And you can't sit there and tell me "Mario 64" plays the same as "Mario Galaxy".
"Battlefield", "COD" and "Killzone" aren't doing anything that "Half Life 2" didn't do almost 10 years ago.
"COD" has had 10 games since 2003 and 10 other related "COD" titles separate from the main series.
"Battlefield" has had 12 games in the series since 2002.
"Forza" has had 6 games since 2005
To put it into perspective there have only been 19 "Mario" titles since 1985. Damn near 30 years.
So
Fred.
Your logic is broken though because you are lumping all the different Mario games in to justify the "rehash" idea. but in those 19 different Mario games there are 2D side scrollers, RPGs and 3D adventures. hardly rehashes of the same game. Yes the characters are the same but the gameplay differs greatly, even within the same genre.Your logic is broken here. There have been 19 Mario games which is more than any of the other games you listed.
If the number of sequels mattered, then Mario is old and stale as shyt.
And if Forza continues at its current rate it will have less titles than Mario in 28 years
fukking Christ those quotes. Knew there was a reason I held onto my Wii U
and galaxy feels much different than sunshine which feels much different than 64......yet the new battlefield plays like the last one with :::gasp::: new maps.......
nikkas put 90 hours in a game and say they ain't enjoy it. Only on the colithat's all you needed to say breh
IMO the wolf part was meh but everything else wasthe dragon boss battle one of my favorite boss battles ever...
No they don't. They are "new maps" just like battlefield.
Serious question, u play any of the marios tha have come out in the last ten years?
