Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

[Savvir]

The qoute is that. The rest of Reddit post was pure "would've shouldve could've" talk

You don't have the tech to go to the moon but somehow want to go to Mars now....

Common Sense isn't there for you homie.

Wanting to go to mars =//= having the tech, support, and protocols in place already.

Going to the moon would require development of a wide assortment of new tech to make it a viable and safe mission. Definitely aint going back in the equipment from the 60's that is no longer supported by the retired engineers of that day.

 

[Booker T Garvey]

The video is saying there is a 2nd light source right. If there was a second light source that source would also produce a second shadow to the astronaut standing there

fam...at 25 minutes flat in the video there is a still shot of shadows that don't line up. it's right there

here's the image blown up...look at the shadows, the yellow arrows help you:

Spoiler: big picture

 

[OJ Simpsom]

Waiting for ya'll to explain the crosshairs and why no crater from the landing blast under the landed space shuttle. Did it just float to a landing?

 

[Booker T Garvey]

you're using NASA to thwart a criticism of NASA fam, that's not a good look at all

secondly, this explanation is absurd...their excuse is that everything is in museums!?

they didn't even save the blueprints or any paperwork of anything associated with traveling to the moon at all. nothing.

that would be like Microsoft not coming out w/anything after Windows 95 arguing "y'all bought everything up!! we can't many any more Windows!!"

 

[Booker T Garvey]

Waiting for ya'll to explain the crosshairs and why no crater from the landing blast under the landed space shuttle. Did it just float to a landing?

they're very carefully picking the shyt they wanna address from that video

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

fam...at 25 minutes flat in the video there is a still shot of shadows that don't line up. it's right there

here's the image blown up...look at the shadows, the yellow arrows help you:

Spoiler: big picture

While it's true that the shadows cast by sunlit objects are roughly parallel over flat, level ground, it is not true that they will always appear parallel when photographed. In fact, they will appear parallel to the eye or camera only under very special circumstances.

Converging shadows of objects lit by the sun. A combination of terrain and perspective produces shadows in the upper right of the image that appear to lie almost at right angles to the shadow of the photographer.

​

 

[904]

fam...at 25 minutes flat in the video there is a still shot of shadows that don't line up. it's right there

here's the image blown up...look at the shadows, the yellow arrows help you:

Spoiler: big picture

Yes that's what I'm referring too.. This is where she's speaking to an additional light source.. I'm saying there would be another shadow somewhere in the shot if there was a 2nd light source

And uneven terrain would explain how those shadows are angled

 

[Booker T Garvey]

While it's true that the shadows cast by sunlit objects are roughly parallel over flat, level ground, it is not true that they will always appear parallel when photographed. In fact, they will appear parallel to the eye or camera only under very special circumstances.

Converging shadows of objects lit by the sun. A combination of terrain and perspective produces shadows in the upper right of the image that appear to lie almost at right angles to the shadow of the photographer.

​

those are objects in that photo though, large objects at that, not tiny rocks.

post a photo of large objects with converging shadows with one light source

 

[Booker T Garvey]

Yes that's what I'm referring too.. This is where she's speaking to an additional light source.. I'm saying there would be another shadow somewhere in the shot if there was a 2nd light source

And uneven terrain would explain how those shadows are angled

All of those shadows appear to be pointing in the same direction though breh

 

[ChatGPT-5]

Electric cars only been around 20 years with extremely limited budget. Your excuses don't work here.

no. it does. because by your logic, we have the technology now to go to the moon, but don't.

 

[904]

All of those shadows appear to be pointing in the same direction though breh

They're not.. The two posts closest to you would intersect.. The slight rise of the beach sand to right of the walkway is causing that effect on the post on the right

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Waiting for ya'll to explain the crosshairs and why no crater from the landing blast under the landed space shuttle. Did it just float to a landing?

The crosshairs are due to a reseau plate fitted to the Hasselblad cameras. It's a clear glass plate with the crosshairs etched into it. It is used in photogrammetry to establish geometrical basis for measuring sizes of objects in photographs.

The reason there's no crater under the landing area is because they landed on solid rock.

​

 

[Booker T Garvey]

They're not.. The two posts closest to you would intersect.. The slight rise of the beach sand to right of the walkway is causing that effect on the post on the right

Nah bruh those shadows are pointing to the right, of one of them was pointing straight up you’d have an argument

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

those are objects in that photo though, large objects at that, not tiny rocks.

post a photo of large objects with converging shadows with one light source

Here ya' go...

​

 

[OJ Simpsom]

The reason there's no crater under the landing area is because they​

landed​

on solid rock.

​

Source?