Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

[Meowth tote da Uzi]

So you stupid nikkas think that they had the space tech to go to the moon but not the tech to fake it. That sounds extremely stupid. You nikkas make me laugh

 

[Booker T Garvey]

​

I ignored it because it's false. The technology to 'fake' those shots didn't exist. As far as the 'slowed down' footage, that's just due to the disparity between the information sent from orbiters to the telescopes then re-transmitted to TV stations. Some information gets lost in-transition from one medium to another.....like converting from FLAC to .MP3.
​

This is one of the flat out lies you just told..they actually SHOW THEM FAKING THE SHOT IN THE DOCUMENTARY (TIME STAMPED)


so something that you say didn't exist is right here on video!?! do you not care how crazy you look right now!?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

I've been doing this for about 3 replies now, you're flat out REFUSING to answer questions

I answer questions but you, however, have not been forthcoming with the arguments you believe are facts concerning the Moon landing being faked.​

stopped here and didn't even bother with the rest. asking you to clarify your statement isn't a strawman and you know it

If you had asked me to clarify a statement, I wouldn't have stated what I did. What I plainly stated was that the transmission from the lunar modules to the earth and then to TV stations was the reason for the 'issue' you raised.....which isn't an issue.​

 

[YakSpiller]

It is a bit strange that the tech was destroyed and footage was lost. Such an important part of our history, you would think people would take more care of something so significant. Its odd as hell.

Not saying we didn’t go just a observation.

 

[thekingsmen]

Source or you talking out yo ass

Did you read the thread earlier...

 

[Savvir]

Did you read the thread earlier...

Your source is thecoli?

 

[904]

About 25 min into the video they're talking about the pictures taken on the moon

They said the shadows show evidence of 2nd light source because the angle of the shadows. Well, if there was a 2nd light source, there would also be a 2nd shadow correct?

She also said something about a one of the astronauts standing fully in a shadow yet being lit up like a Christmas tree lol The moon isn't made of vantablack, absorbing all the light it receives. It actually reflects some light off its surface just like Earth. You don't go hidden walking into a shadow on Earth in the day..

This video has a lot of filler

 

[904]

Skipping ahead a little bit to the flag

The flag isn't blowing on the moon.. If you look at the top, you can see how rigid it is.. That's because there was a rod placed at the top to straighten the flag. Otherwise, it'd look less impressive with limp, hanging flag

 

[Booker T Garvey]

About 25 min into the video they're talking about the pictures taken on the moon

They said the shadows show evidence of 2nd light source because the angle of the shadows. Well, if there was a 2nd light source, there would also be a 2nd shadow correct?

huh? The shadows pointing in different directions is proof of a second light source

go outside right now and look at the shadows, if they’re all pointing in different directions let us know

 

[thekingsmen]

Your source is thecoli?

I figured you don't have Common sense.

 

[904]

huh? The shadows pointing in different directions is proof of a second light source

go outside right now and look at the shadows, if they’re all pointing in different directions let us know

The video is saying there is a 2nd light source right. If there was a second light source that source would also produce a second shadow to the astronaut standing there

 

[Savvir]

I figured you don't have Common sense.

 

[thekingsmen]

The qoute is that. The rest of Reddit post was pure "would've shouldve could've" talk

You don't have the tech to go to the moon but somehow want to go to Mars now....

Common Sense isn't there for you homie.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

It is a bit strange that the tech was destroyed and footage was lost. Such an important part of our history, you would think people would take more care of something so significant. Its odd as hell.

Not saying we didn’t go just a observation.

There's nothing 'strange' about it. Lots of stuff was put in museums and archives, but some stuff just fell through the cracks.

That's NORMAL in a bureaucracy and a valid observation. They should have taken better care of the stuff.​

 

[thekingsmen]

There's nothing 'strange' about it. Lots of stuff was put in museums and archives, but some stuff just fell through the cracks.

That's NORMAL in a bureaucracy and a valid observation. They should have taken better care of the stuff.​