Cost and budget cuts
Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked
- Thread starter Black Panther
- Start date
So you go on the inclusion route to deflect.
A quick Google on the moon dust not being on the lander..
You can't test this on Earth obviously
"First, lunar dust will drop straight down if it is released – be it from an astronaut that picks it up or from the force of a rocket engine’s exhaust (which, while not strong enough to create a crater was strong enough to suspend lunar dust). Second, the Apollo engines were shut off before the craft landed.
Consequently, as soon as the engines shut off, the source of a temporary atmosphere that surrounded the craft was terminated, and the dust that was suspended in it immediately dropped towards the lunar surface. The craft still had both a horizontal component to its trajectory, and the legs were above the majority of any of the temporary atmosphere that suspended the dust.
Hence, when the craft landed, it landed both to the side of the settled dust, and the dust would have already settled before the craft touched down, preventing any from being deposited on the LM’s footpads."
You can't test this on Earth obviously
"First, lunar dust will drop straight down if it is released – be it from an astronaut that picks it up or from the force of a rocket engine’s exhaust (which, while not strong enough to create a crater was strong enough to suspend lunar dust). Second, the Apollo engines were shut off before the craft landed.
Consequently, as soon as the engines shut off, the source of a temporary atmosphere that surrounded the craft was terminated, and the dust that was suspended in it immediately dropped towards the lunar surface. The craft still had both a horizontal component to its trajectory, and the legs were above the majority of any of the temporary atmosphere that suspended the dust.
Hence, when the craft landed, it landed both to the side of the settled dust, and the dust would have already settled before the craft touched down, preventing any from being deposited on the LM’s footpads."
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,285
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Booker T Garvey said:
How deep a crater were you expecting to see when the dust is only a couple inches deep?
Hmmmm no.
How deep a crater were you expecting to see when the dust is only a couple inches deep?
Ones as deep as this...get ta googlin’
They will keep changing the story to fit the narrative. If I were to prove there was moon dust under the landed ship they would think of another excuse.I didn’t even post the moon buggies, we’ve seen these videos our whole lives, never heard anybody say the moon was a solid damn rock
Doesn't look that deep.Ones as deep as this...get ta googlin’
Propulsion doesn't affect the ground that much when there's no atmosphere to transfer energy.
simple question simple answer .
I'm not doing tit for tat with you on this issue. NASA budget is good enough