Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Did you watch this video?

Every single claim in that video has been debunked on various different sites.

Arguments from Incredulity are not valid.

The video is trash and posting it multiple times won't turn it into 'scholarship'.
​

 

[Booker T Garvey]

NONE of this proves that we didn't go to the Moon. What it does prove is that the video technology back then was insufficient to fake it and there were far too many people involved for any type of 'conspiracy' to remain a secret for this long. Hell, we knew Clinton got a blowjob within a couple months after the fact.

Also, Neil Armstrong stated we DID go to the Moon. People love to post that video of him stating 'We didn't', but that's his answer to the question 'Why didn't we go BACK?'
​

Grown men can read and ALL the facts point to the Moon landing taking place. If you believe otherwise, then just casting suspicion on the evidence doesn't prove that we didn't. You'll have to come-up with more evidence to the contrary other than......'The gubment be lyin............

!!!!!'​

1) I just said they had the video technology then but shared grainy black and white footage with the rest of the world - they SHOW it in the documentary

2) I never said anything about what neil armstrong said, the film points out that he basically shunned interviews for decades essentially barely talking about it publicly...
if the first man to walk on the moon barely talking about it doesn't strike you as odd, that’s just you being a contrarian.

3) You ignored my other bullet points especially about them faking that shot of earth to make it appear as though they were farther away than what they were, what about the slowed down footage from "the moon"

the purpose of disproving evidence is to......actually try and disprove the evidence fam...i'm waiting

 

[Booker T Garvey]

Every single claim in that video has been debunked on various different sites.
​

post them.

 

[OJ Simpsom]

Every single claim in that video has been debunked on various different sites.​

Post em then. Let's see your links disproving every single claim in this video.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

1) I just said they had the video technology then but shared grainy black and white footage with the rest of the world - they SHOW it in the documentary

The rest of the world didn't have that technology. Just like the Internet, the rest of the world didn't have it until 30 years after it was invented.​

2) I never said anything about what neil armstrong said, the film points out that he basically shunned interviews for decades essentially barely talking about it publicly...
if the first man to walk on the moon barely talking about it doesn't strike you as odd is just you being a contrarian.

Introverts don't like to be in the spotlight so there's nothing 'odd' about his attitude.​

3) You ignored my other bullet points especially about them faking that shot of earth to make it appear as though they were farther away than what they were, what about the slowed down footage from "the moon"

I ignored it because it's false. The technology to 'fake' those shots didn't exist. As far as the 'slowed down' footage, that's just due to the disparity between the information sent from orbiters to the telescopes then re-transmitted to TV stations. Some information gets lost in-transition from one medium to another.....like converting from FLAC to .MP3.
​

the purpose of disproving evidence is to......actually try and disprove the evidence fam...i'm waiting

You haven't disproved the Moon landing....which is YOUR argument.

Your 'evidence' is nothing more than an argument from incredulity.....which is invalid.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

post them.

Post the claims from the video that convinced YOU the landing was fake.

That way I know exactly where you stand and won't be making strawmen arguments against you.

I'll debunk them one by one.

​

 

[Booker T Garvey]

The rest of the world didn't have that technology. Just like the Internet, the rest of the world didn't have it until 30 years after it was invented.​

Introverts don't like to be in the spotlight so there's nothing 'odd' about his attitude.​

I ignored it because it's false. The technology to 'fake' those shots didn't exist. As far as the 'slowed down' footage, that's just due to the disparity between the information sent from orbiters to the telescopes then re-transmitted to TV stations. Some information gets lost in-transition from one medium to another.....like converting from FLAC to .MP3.
​

You haven't disproved the Moon landing....which is YOUR argument.

Your 'evidence' is nothing more than an argument from incredulity.....which is invalid.

​

- I have no idea what you mean with your first point, the rest of the world didn't have color tv's? what are you saying?

- NASA won't even tell anybody why they destroyed everything pertaining to apollo 11

they're not even lying about it being destroyed in a fire, at least that's believable...nah they're just saying "it's gone!"

it's funny, if a child told this to their parents or a teacher we'd know they were lying or covering something up in a matter of seconds...but when it's NASA all of a sudden we need to believe them.

but again, it's all about BELIEVING they went, evidence and your own common sense be damned

 

[Booker T Garvey]

Post the claims from the video that convinced YOU the landing was fake.

That way I know exactly where you stand and won't be making strawmen arguments against you.

I'll debunk them one by one.

​

It's time stamped in this post here from the previous page
https://www.thecoli.com/posts/35114102/

seriously, just debunk the things listed...nevermind the lighting from the "moon" that day was clearly fake and from different light sources (the sun doesn't produce counter angling shadows)

but let's dumb ourselves down so we can believe what we were told when we were toddlers as full grown men now

 

[RAX 010]

Damn this thread is good...
im bout to make something to eat and come back...

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

]It's time stamped in this post here from the previous page
https://www.thecoli.com/posts/35114102/

seriously, just debunk the things listed...nevermind the lighting from the "moon" that day was clearly fake and from different light sources (the sun doesn't produce counter angling shadows)

No. I'm not watching that again. Just post the specific claims YOU agree with and I'll go through them one by one.​

The lighting from the Moon wasn't fake whatsoever. The Sun doesn't produce shadows. The objects blocking it's light rays, which are parallel, do.

​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

- I have no idea what you mean with your first point, the rest of the world didn't have color tv's? what are you saying?

Strawman. I never said the rest of the world didn't have color tv's. Try again.​

- NASA won't even tell anybody why they destroyed everything pertaining to apollo 11

That doesn't mean they didn't go to the Moon, though.​

it's funny, if a child told this to their parents or a teacher we'd know they were lying or covering something up in a matter of seconds...but when it's NASA all of a sudden we need to believe them.

This doesn't prove we didn't go to the Moon.​

but again, it's all about BELIEVING they went, evidence and your own common sense be damned

Well, the evidence supplied is overwhelmingly in-support of the landings happening while YOUR argument consists of just doubting the evidence while not supplying any of your own to prove that they faked it.​

 

[thekingsmen]

- I have no idea what you mean with your first point, the rest of the world didn't have color tv's? what are you saying?

- NASA won't even tell anybody why they destroyed everything pertaining to apollo 11

they're not even lying about it being destroyed in a fire, at least that's believable...nah they're just saying "it's gone!"

it's funny, if a child told this to their parents or a teacher we'd know they were lying or covering something up in a matter of seconds...but when it's NASA all of a sudden we need to believe them.

but again, it's all about BELIEVING they went, evidence and your own common sense be damned

Don't bother...he bs his way throughout the thread.

 

[thekingsmen]

Oh yes. and electric cars are also more beneficial by why do you think that's taking a long time to implement.

Solar power panels are now very practical for every home, and yet it's not standard issued. Wonder why.

Electric cars only been around 20 years with extremely limited budget. Your excuses don't work here.

 

[Booker T Garvey]

No. I'm not watching that again. Just post the specific claims YOU agree with and I'll go through them one by one.​

​

I've been doing this for about 3 replies now, you're flat out REFUSING to answer questions

Strawman. I never said the rest of the world didn't have​

stopped here and didn't even bother with the rest. asking you to clarify your statement isn't a strawman and you know it, you just don't want to answer tough questions. We can just agree to disagree.

 

[Savvir]

NASA even stated we can't go back to moon b/c we dont have that technology as before

Source or you talking out yo ass