Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

[OJ Simpsom]

It is easier to build a SpaceX rocket ship than it is to build a mass-produced late 1800s locomotive because the production materials and knowledge are still here.

I don't think you have the slightest grasp on industrial engineering. You need to have the production system in existence to make something.

Naw it should be easy if they did actually go in the 60s. Technology has advanced 1000x over since then. Them excuses are old and only fit the narrative NASA tries to push. Man has never set foot on the moon. If you think tech from the 60s could take us there, then I think its you that doesn't grasp the impossibilities of the original story and the technology/materials actually needed to call someone from the moon on an old phone let alone get there AND BACK safely. Its impossible now and it was impossible then.

 

[xCivicx]

It is easier to build a SpaceX rocket ship than it is to build a mass-produced late 1800s locomotive because the production materials and knowledge are still here.

I don't think you have the slightest grasp on industrial engineering. You need to have the production system in existence to make something.

More complete gibberish

 

[Wardo]

We sent robots to the moon not people

 

[Savvir]

Now it's about me when you know your intelligence has shyt to do with retaining info in school. Good job exposing yourself.

I quoted you saying schools don't teach common sense or critical thinking.... And you randomly start talking about info retention?

The school system you experienced was terrible. Not all school systems are like that. Your lack of education isn't necessarily a handicap, but trying to compare all curriculums to the one you went through is disingenuous.

And went it comes to secondary education, if you went to a good institution your opinion of college would also be different.

Your anti intellectualism reflects on the lack of good schools in our community.

 

[thekingsmen]

I quoted you saying schools don't teach common sense or critical thinking.... And you randomly start talking about info retention?

The school system you experienced was terrible. Not all school systems are like that. Your lack of education isn't necessarily a handicap, but trying to compare all curriculums to the one you went through is disingenuous.

And went it comes to secondary education, if you went to a good institution your opinion of college would also be different.

Your anti intellectualism reflects on the lack of good schools in our community.

I never said college was bad. You comprehension is off which shows alot.

Common sense isn't given to alot of people...no school can give you that. I dealt with many educated fools. You have been taught a one way thinking pattern.

Anti intellectualism is a term widely used by those who simply cant debate issues with others. When you are stuck in a box and can't understand why everyone is not in it, you use this term.

 

[thekingsmen]

Goofy flat-Earthers flooded this thread I'm sure.

Have you seen 2001: A Space Odyssey? Nothing about the film looked like real space travel or exploration

What does space look like then?

 

[thekingsmen]

It is easier to build a SpaceX rocket ship than it is to build a mass-produced late 1800s locomotive because the production materials and knowledge are still here.

I don't think you have the slightest grasp on industrial engineering. You need to have the production system in existence to make something.

They have restoration locomotives today.







https://www.heraldextra.com/news/lo...d1843913-0ba7-540d-9da5-ed3932e3b444.amp.html

 

[Greenhornet]

There's about 20 things people already mentioned
It's a secret society all we ask is trust

You'd have to be sheltered and retarded to believe we actually did that shyt ... at this point, id drag my penis across your gums.

 

[EndDomination]

They have restoration locomotives today.







https://www.heraldextra.com/news/lo...d1843913-0ba7-540d-9da5-ed3932e3b444.amp.html

I didn't say restored boi, I said produce as in "build from scratch."

Its vastly cheaper to go to space now than it was then.
Independent companies are doing it now on fractions of the budget NASA and the Soviet Space Agency had.

 

[EndDomination]

Naw it should be easy if they did actually go in the 60s. Technology has advanced 1000x over since then. Them excuses are old and only fit the narrative NASA tries to push. Man has never set foot on the moon. If you think tech from the 60s could take us there, then I think its you that doesn't grasp the impossibilities of the original story and the technology/materials actually needed to call someone from the moon on an old phone let alone get there AND BACK safely. Its impossible now and it was impossible then.

It is 10x easier, which is why SpaceX sends rockets to space every few months.

You don't understand how industrial supply chains work, don't pretend like you do.

 

[OJ Simpsom]

It is 10x easier, which is why SpaceX sends rockets to space every few months.

You don't understand how industrial supply chains work, don't pretend like you do.

That's you're reason why they can't go back to the moon. Because some factories shut down that made the parts. That's your final answer.Right.

 

[OJ Simpsom]

 

[OJ Simpsom]

 

[thekingsmen]

I didn't say restored boi, I said produce as in "build from scratch."

Its vastly cheaper to go to space now than it was then.
Independent companies are doing it now on fractions of the budget NASA and the Soviet Space Agency had.

It can be done. It was 1969 not 1800 so stop making excuses.

 

[ChatGPT-5]

That's you're reason why they can't go back to the moon. Because some factories shut down that made the parts. That's your final answer.Right.

why would they do that, when they've been there a numerous times. it's not like there's various terrains and thousands of different rocks to study. The job is already done, it's now all about the far side of the moon, but there is no light there, so humans are sending robots instead.