Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

[Black Panther]

I wonder why you didnt actually post the whole convo??

It doesn't go much better for you.

The only way that light refraction would even PARTIALLY explain the lighting of the moon in the video I posted would be if the sun were on the exact opposite horizon, 180 degrees away

I'm not sure how many times I have to explain this to you. :bpfacepalm:

Do you understand why selenelion eclipses are supposed to be "impossible", and why light refraction explains why they're not?

Selenelion eclipses can only be observed during lunar eclipses.

If a lunar eclipse is Sun > Earth > Moon with the Earth casting a shadow on the Moon, then yes, you're supposed to observe the Sun and Moon roughly 180 degrees (opposite) from each other in the sky.

A selenelion eclipse occurs when you see the shadow of the Earth completely covering (eclipsing) the moon, while both the Sun and Moon, to us, appear above the horizon. The thought being that if a lunar eclipse occurs when the Earth aligns between the Sun and Moon, we would expect the Moon and Sun to be at the horizon line (or slightly below it). :bpohh:

Because of light being refracted through our atmosphere--in the same way light refracts through a glass of water--it makes the Sun and Moon appear to be above the horizon line. In actuality, they're perfectly aligned.
Do you think that the Moon...is supposed to be between the Sun and Earth...during a lunar eclipse? :bpohh:

Can you explain the difference between solar and lunar eclipses for me, please? Just so I know we're on the same page? :bpohh:

 

[Black Panther]

Are you still too p*ssy to answer it or do you finally have the confidence?

I don't even know what question you're referring to. I don't read half the sh*t you type, so it's not like I keep a log of your responses.

 

[xCivicx]

It doesn't go much better for you.




I'm not sure how many times I have to explain this to you. :bpfacepalm:

Do you understand why selenelion eclipses are supposed to be "impossible", and why light refraction explains why they're not?

Selenelion eclipses can only be observed during lunar eclipses.

If a lunar eclipse is Sun > Earth > Moon with the Earth casting a shadow on the Moon, then yes, you're supposed to observe the Sun and Moon roughly 180 degrees (opposite) from each other in the sky.

A selenelion eclipse occurs when you see the shadow of the Earth completely covering (eclipsing) the moon, while both the Sun and Moon, to us, appear above the horizon. The thought being that if a lunar eclipse occurs when the Earth aligns between the Sun and Moon, we would expect the Moon and Sun to be at the horizon line (or slightly below it). :bpohh:

Because of light being refracted through our atmosphere--in the same way light refracts through a glass of water--it makes the Sun and Moon appear to be above the horizon line. In actuality, they're perfectly aligned.
Do you think that the Moon...is supposed to be between the Sun and Earth...during a lunar eclipse? :bpohh:

Can you explain the difference between solar and lunar eclipses for me, please? Just so I know we're on the same page? :bpohh:

More talking around my posts

Youre literally arguing with yourself

I posted a video that YOU HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO LOGICALLY EXPLAIN, EVEN TO THIS DAY

All that other gibberish youre talking is just that, gibberish

Light refraction DOES NOT EXPLAIN SELENHELION ECLIPSES IN ANY WAY, which is the point that i was attempting to get through to you in the previous thread

Ill happily teach you the difference between the eclipses once you answer my question

 

[xCivicx]

I don't even know what question you're referring to. I don't read half the sh*t you type, so it's not like I keep a log of your responses.

Cool

Can i ask you a simple question about heliocentric theory?

 

[Black Panther]

Cool

Can i ask you a simple question about heliocentric theory?

JUST ASK THE F*CKING QUESTION. I have no idea what you're babbling about. :bpmjtf:

 

[xCivicx]

JUST ASK THE F*CKING QUESTION. I have no idea what you're babbling about. :bpmjtf:

Ok so we can both agree that its scientific fact that time is constant on earth

12 noon on Monday is 12 noon on Tuesday 24 hours later is 12 noon on Wednesday 24 hours later and so on....

Hypothetical:
You walk outside at 12 noon on January 1 of any given year, look up and see the sun in the sky

24 hours later, you walk outside at 12 noon on January 2, look up and see the sun in the sky

Let's start with the earth on the far left on January 1

You do this every day with consistency

Fast forward 6 months to July 1 of that same year

Now the earth is to the far right in the pic

You walk outside at 12 noon. Why do you still see the sun in the sky?

According to heliocentric theory, we on earth are on the exact opposite side of the sun than we were on January 1, so we should be facing away from the sun at noon on July 1, which means 12 noon January 1 should be 12 midnight on July 1

Can you explain why we dont observe this in real life?

@Black Panther

 

[Black Panther]

@Black Panther

The Earth itself is spinning as it revolves around the Sun.

 

[xCivicx]

The Earth itself is spinning as it spins around the Sun.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with my question because we're only taking a snapshot of the earths positioning at 12 noon, the same time every day

So i await a logical explanation for this phenomenon @Black Panther

 

[Savvir]

Sounds like hoe babble requirements for men.

i mean.....
if a nikka aint got his shyt together enough for the basic requirements of smashing an aint shyt thot...
then why would i sit and argue science with the same cat?

 

[thekingsmen]

i mean.....
if a nikka aint got his shyt together enough for the basic requirements of smashing an aint shyt thot...
then why would i sit and argue science with the same cat?

Somehow money makes you smarter? Here is your logic if you aren't a science professor making 175,000 then I won't argue with you.

 

[iBrowse]

 

[iBrowse]

 

[904]

@Black Panther

It'd be easier to physically demonstrate but the Earth rotates as it revolves around the sun..

The sun is always there and our rotation is constant. What you seem to be saying is the Earth isn't rotating at all.. As in if we're facing the sun at one time of the year then we're facing away from it 6 months later. That would be true if we weren't rotating but we are.

 

[Savvir]

Somehow money makes you smarter? Here is your logic if you aren't a science professor making 175,000 then I won't argue with you.

I'm not arguing with somebody who doesn't take their education seriously. Other aspects of a person's life will reflect that. You don't have to be a professor, but in not arguing science with 30 year old retail workers in south carolina

 

[xCivicx]

It'd be easier to physically demonstrate but the Earth rotates as it revolves around the sun..

The sun is always there and our rotation is constant. What you seem to be saying is the Earth isn't rotating at all.. As in if we're facing the sun at one time of the year then we're facing away from it 6 months later. That would be true if we weren't rotating but we are.

You're not actually understanding what I'm asking smh

It does not matter that the earth is rotating, we're only looking at the earth's position at 12 noon every day

Every 24 hours the earth has made 1 full rotation so at 12 noon on jan 1, the earth is facing the same direction as it will be on jan 2 at 12 noon and so on and so forth

Do you understand what I'm saying?