Ya' Cousin Cleon
OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
so you just gonna forget the Civil Rights movement during that time.goddamn no wonder ya'll fall for this shyt. absent minded af.
Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked
- Thread starter Black Panther
- Start date
so you just gonna forget the Civil Rights movement during that time.goddamn no wonder ya'll fall for this shyt. absent minded af.
O³ (O cubed)
No more PAWGs, PLEASE??!!!??
Faking the moon landing in 1969 would have been harder than just...going to the moon.
Dudes really want to feel special
This white cat has been wrong on several things so I don't take him seriously.
I'm using their own logic against them.
Believe cac propaganda brehs.
The Flat Earth/Coli Star Wars threads be some of the most entertaining joints on here.
@Black Panther still hasn't been prove the Earth is round though.@xCivicx
I actually don't have to. :bpumad:
@xCivicx is the one going against established science, not me. The burden of proof is not on me to show that the world is round (an oblate shperoid)--on the contrary, the burden of proof is on him to show that A.) The world is not round (oblate spheroid) and B.) the world is a flat plane.
That's like saying you have to provide proof to a person that the sky is blue. You actually don't have to prove anything; the skeptic has to show why it's not blue. :panthersafe:
Ive proven my case many many MANY times on here
In fact ive been asking a very simple question about heliocentric theory over and over in flat earth threads that youve ducked and ignored every single time
Do you finally feel confident enough to try and answer it? We can ban bet that youll fail to provide a logical explanation
That's the part that kills me :mjlolhairfade:
Using science that was [likely] discovered by white people to dispute "cac science" :mjlolfacepalm:
This is the failure point of many conspiracy theories.
The lack of evidence of a conspiracy is taken as positive evidence of the conspiracy.
I don’t know what to believe it this is an easy one to refute
Haven’t read the thread someone might of said it
But technology is always way more advanced then the general public knows
They ease us into it
So they coulda had the same shyt we have now back then
And the shytty TVs and cameras woulda been helpful to hide it
Haven’t read the thread someone might of said it
But technology is always way more advanced then the general public knows
They ease us into it
So they coulda had the same shyt we have now back then
And the shytty TVs and cameras woulda been helpful to hide it
Your continued lack of intelligence kills meThat's the part that kills me :mjlolhairfade:
Using science that was [likely] discovered by white people to dispute "cac science" :mjlolfacepalm:
This is the failure point of many conspiracy theories.
The lack of evidence of a conspiracy is taken as positive evidence of the conspiracy.
My ancestors invented damn near all sciences
My ancestors also knew that the earth was flat and unmoving
White people told you we all exploded from nothing and now were spinning at incomprehensible speeds through nothing while a giant ball of gas 100 million miles away holds us just close to it in this nothing that life just randomly happened to be able to randomly start from nothing on a rock floating through nothing
Those same white people you religiously believe in intertwine evolution and the big bang theories, meaning that because you believe norhing randomly exploded into the extremely balanced system that we all live in, you ALSO believe that the African is genetically inferior to the European, and this is something that cannot be disputed because all of those beliefs are directly connected to eachother and cannot be separated because of the nature in which they were fabricated into existence
Its getting really sad at this point
No...you actually haven't. :mjlolhairfade:
You think that if someone stops arguing with you, that means you win the argument :mjlolhairfade:
Some people just don't have the time or patience to explain basic sh*t to idiots. :mjlolhairfade:
I remember very clearly having to explain to you what a lunar eclipse was, what light refraction is, and why senhelion eclipses don't "disprove" heliocentric theory. :mjlolhairfade:
Again, show me an example of a solar senhelion eclipse, and I'll believe you.
Nothing you've said is a reflection of what I actually believe about our origins, but sure, keep making assumptions. :bpumad:
Feel free to quote where you think you explained what a lunar eclipse is to meNo...you actually haven't. :mjlolhairfade:
You think that if someone stops arguing with you, that means they can't and you win the argument :mjlolhairfade:
Some people just don't have the time or patience to explain basic sh*t to idiots. :mjlolhairfade:
I remember very clearly having to explain to you what a lunar eclipse was, what light refraction is, and why senhelion eclipses don't "disprove" heliocentric theory. :mjlolhairfade:
Again, show me an example of a solar senhelion eclipse, and I'll believe you.
Make sure you link to that thread so that everyone can see how youre embarrassing yourself again
And yes, selenhelion eclipses most definitely disprove heliocentric theory but thats not even what about to son you with. Ive done that enough over various threads
Are you ready to answer my question about heliocentric theory yet??
If you believe in heliocentric theory, then you believe all of that
This is a fact
