Why The Moon Landing Couldn't Have Been Faked

[Ghost Utmost]

The white man has told ya'll black people have been 13% of the US population for the last 40 years. Yet the same white man has statistics that black people have a positive birth rate while white people have a huge negative birth rate. Also states white people have the oldest average age of every race

The white man has told ya'll black people didn't contribute to technological advancements in computer technology. Yet the same white man writes articles about Mark E Dean, Dr. Philip Emeagwali, and Henry Thomas Sampson, Jr.

The white man has told ya'll Ancient Egyptians were white arabs. Yet the same white man documents mountains of evidence that Ancient Egyptians are black

The white man has told ya'll the only time Black people came to America was from Slave ships. Yet the same white man documents about Black conquistadors that sailed the ocean in the 1500s and led explorations


If you're over 18, and don't realize the mountain of inconsistencies the white man creates, Then I have nothing else to say to you

So are you gonna research my post on the Van Allen Radiation Belts and the scientists that support it, or are you hold on tight to this moon landing theory because you caping for what a certain white man says?

Point still stands

I happen to believe in Science generally so I navigate it with my common sense

Now

The Moon landing is kinda shady. I personally wouldn't count out either possibility. But I don't ever say I KNOW what happened.

But the Van Allen Belt. Why is that super convincing to you - since its equally as inaccessible to your 5 senses as the Moon landing - ?

No need to find another long ass deflection.

Both things are equally outside of our ability to "know for sure" yet you decide which is absolute fact based on reports.

I'm suggesting that you delete the absolutes from your process and just work with possibilities. Probabilities.

You can hold two opposite possibilities in your mind at once. Wait until you can totally discount one - based evidence, not gut - before you

totally discount one

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

these nikkas read too many cartoons

The communists are our enemies!!!

So now the US and the Soviets never been enemies. ok doc, yall hold it in the road, I'm going to sleep.

 

[NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong]

 

[Geek Nasty]

It’s this fukkin simple


Believe a white man went out the earth in a man made ship on fire to the fukkin moon

I’ll never believe that shyt til they do it again.
If they could then they would
Simple as that.

They don’t care bout wasting money so I don’t wanna hear that Shìt

Like another poster said, you'll believe a white man's conspiracy theory we didn't land on the moon but you won't believe the white man's history that we landed on the moon you can't have it both ways

More Russian facebook fake news, the amount of dumb shyt I never get exposed to staying off those websites

 

[Geek Nasty]

Few things folks have to realize that those missions to the moon cost billions...just one mission even in the 60s or 70s.

For example the apollo missions in 1974 cost 25 billion which is the equivalent to 153 billion dollars today.

Lets put the 153 billion dollars in perspect. Today the new stealth bomber being built by Northtrop Grumman (qty of 100 planes) is expected to cost between 50 billion to 100 billion in initial and over run costs.

Second when building top secret planes and instruments the government often times destroys the tooling needed to build these items. For example after Northrop Grumman built the B-2, after Lockheed built the F-117 and F-22. The tooling to build these planes were destroyed by the government so they wouldn't fall in enemy hands.

This even came up in 2016 when I believe the airforce asked if congress would give them funding for new F-22s. The cost to restart the program was in the billions. Their reason was that they would have to make everything....tooling, machining, supply chain and etc over again. They even estimated that old engineers from the program would have to be signed back on because no one knew how to build the plane.

See in engineering when they say they can't build something again. What they mean is they can't justify the cost to build it...plus the original engineers who built it are no longer around. Which means they pretty much have to rebuild the thing from scratch.

Which means their is a huge learning curve plus tribal knowledge that only the folks who originally built it understood. Just having something on paper or in a model doesn't tell you all the nuances of building it. Especially something that is huge and an entire system.

shyt that ain't even including technicians, assemblers, testers and etc who all have experience building the product originally. All these people will need to be found or replaced.

shyt is a huge effort. Hell I remember when I worked in DoD years ago. We had a old mechanical unit (that needed to be repaired) come in for a B-52 that was being refurbished. The original maker had gone out of business. We couldn't find anyone who knew how to fix this part. The part was from the 60s. We literally had to find this old 70 year old engineer who had originally helped build the mechanical unit back in the 60s....and hire him to rebuild the unit.

There are all kinds of stories about the lost knowledge about old parts. People don't appreciate how much engineering has changed in 70 years. Just how much fasteners have changed is one thing. Trying to rebuild something that was riveted together in the 60s when we haven't used that kind of tech in probably 50 years

Part of the reason we cancelled the shuttle is we're working on a next generation booster with the capability to get us back to the moon. The best the shuttle could do was low-earth orbit.

 

[Ya Sinning Mane]

Like another poster said, you'll believe a white man's conspiracy theory we didn't land on the moon but you won't believe the white man's history that we landed on the moon you can't have it both ways

More Russian facebook fake news, the amount of dumb shyt I never get exposed to staying off those websites

i don’t know what u talking bout breh.
I don’t like white opinions on theory or history fool.

Especially history.

 

[LebronsHairline]

Yall got my space itch goin im gonna go watch baumgartner jump out of s prrfectly good balloon again

 

[cartierhoe]

That may very well be one of the dumbest analogies ever typed on this website.

I love these threads

 

[TAYLONDO SAMSWORTHY]

We never went to the moon

I believe its fake for a few reasons.

I’ve heard about the van allen radiation belts but not a lot. What does this mean exactly?

 

[Dwolf]

 

[earl n water]

Folks like you shouldn't be able to procreate nor be around any being that you can influence. You've drowned yourself in this smart dumb rhetoric of I don't believe what the white man says, yet you don't even realize that you literally do everyday tasks because of a white man. You buy certain foods, you wear certain clothes, you use certain technology, you operate in an economic system, you participate and engage in certain interests, all because of the white man. If you were really about that life you wouldn't be posting on this board, but instead living in the confines where the white man had minimal influence over your state of mind/living, but no, instead you're on an anonymous msgboard, regurgitating nothing but nonsense, trying to escape your sad excuse for an existence. You're not even cognizant of how much you're embarrassing yourself with this middle-school discourse about historical events you barely have a surface understanding of, because of some shyt you read on the internet, to mask your insecurities over your lack of intellect, trying to fool yourself by copying-and-pasting other folks' thoughts as if they were your own.

If I didn't know any better I'd swear you're trying to be the most generic smart dumb nikka as some satirical social-experiment.

 

[The M.I.C.]

 

[Kyle C. Barker]

Few things folks have to realize that those missions to the moon cost billions...just one mission even in the 60s or 70s.

For example the apollo missions in 1974 cost 25 billion which is the equivalent to 153 billion dollars today.

Lets put the 153 billion dollars in perspect. Today the new stealth bomber being built by Northtrop Grumman (qty of 100 planes) is expected to cost between 50 billion to 100 billion in initial and over run costs.

Second when building top secret planes and instruments the government often times destroys the tooling needed to build these items. For example after Northrop Grumman built the B-2, after Lockheed built the F-117 and F-22. The tooling to build these planes were destroyed by the government so they wouldn't fall in enemy hands.

This even came up in 2016 when I believe the airforce asked if congress would give them funding for new F-22s. The cost to restart the program was in the billions. Their reason was that they would have to make everything....tooling, machining, supply chain and etc over again. They even estimated that old engineers from the program would have to be signed back on because no one knew how to build the plane.

See in engineering when they say they can't build something again. What they mean is they can't justify the cost to build it...plus the original engineers who built it are no longer around. Which means they pretty much have to rebuild the thing from scratch.

Which means their is a huge learning curve plus tribal knowledge that only the folks who originally built it understood. Just having something on paper or in a model doesn't tell you all the nuances of building it. Especially something that is huge and an entire system.

shyt that ain't even including technicians, assemblers, testers and etc who all have experience building the product originally. All these people will need to be found or replaced.

shyt is a huge effort. Hell I remember when I worked in DoD years ago. We had a old mechanical unit (that needed to be repaired) come in for a B-52 that was being refurbished. The original maker had gone out of business. We couldn't find anyone who knew how to fix this part. The part was from the 60s. We literally had to find this old 70 year old engineer who had originally helped build the mechanical unit back in the 60s....and hire him to rebuild the unit.

Thanks for having the patience to explain that.


Early today I was gonna explain why we can't build the old ford model T even though our technology is more advanced but I was like fukk it once I got done banging out the 2nd paragrah lol

 

[904]

I believe its fake for a few reasons.

I’ve heard about the van allen radiation belts but not a lot. What does this mean exactly?

They are a set of two radiation belts that surround Earth starting at I think 400 or 500 miles above our surface.. They have varying densities of radiation at different spots of the belts..

They're held in place by Earth's magnetic field and if I remember they actually help protect Earth against radiation.

We flew through the lesser dense parts and at the speed in which we flew through, the amount of radiation the astronauts were exposed to was the equivalent of a CAT scan.. I remember seeing astronauts actually had monitors on their bodies showing the exact amount of exposure they received..

The International Space Station orbits Earth much lower the the Van Allen belts but it has also passed through a belt from time to time because the belts actually expand but I don't know too much on why..

 

[TAYLONDO SAMSWORTHY]

They are a set of two radiation belts that surround Earth starting at I think 400 or 500 miles above our surface.. They have varying densities of radiation at different spots of the belts..

They're held in place by Earth's magnetic field and if I remember they actually help protect Earth against radiation.

We flew through the lesser dense parts and at the speed in which we flew through, the amount of radiation the astronauts were exposed to was the equivalent of a CAT scan.. I remember seeing astronauts actually had monitors on their bodies showing the exact amount of exposure they received..

The International Space Station orbits Earth much lower the the Van Allen belts but it has also passed through a belt from time to time because the belts actually expand but I don't know too much on why..

Good looking out on the explanation. Im online researching info now. Thanks for taking the time to drop a response.