All that nitpicking bad shooting displays in a Finals series won by the impact of Bird’s versatility other than scoring isn’t going to change the fact that he was one of the best scorers ever. If the ‘81 Celtics went out like the ‘11 Heat then you might’ve had something there
But the Celtics didn't go out only because his teams were loaded. He could average 15ppg on 40% shooting and still win because his team was just better. And that was probably his WORST finals team. It's nice that they won, but he sure doesn't look like a good scorer. I mean Curry's reputation as a GOAT scorer was pretty much killed by his mediocre Finals performances alone, and he won most of his Finals too and had a lot better effort in the loses than Bird did.
I mean come on now, in Game 3 of the 1981 Finals, Larry went 3-11 for 8 points and they won by 24 (he was the 7th-highest scorer on the team), then he went 3-11 for 8 points again and they lost by 5 despite Maxwell dropping 24 and Parish 18, then he went 5-16 for 12 points and they won by 29. That's what a stacked team will do for you.
In 1984 Finals he went 6-18 for 20 points in Game 7 and they won anyway behind Maxwell/DJ's scoring and the Laker choke.
In 1985 Finals they were tied 2-2 then he went 8-17 for 20 and 12-29 for 28 in losing the last two games and the series.
In the 1987 Finals he went 6-16 for just 16 points in losing the decisive Game 6 and the series.
How can you consistently be THAT quiet in big Finals games and still be the GOAT scorer? It's not like he has some great record of dominant games to counter it either. Even his "good" clutch Finals games are like 8-17 for 28, 10-26 for 28, etc.
And a lot Bird’s career efficiency went down cuz of when he fukked up his back
That's just false, he put up damn near the same shooting numbers post-injury that he did pre-injury.
He had an eFG% of 48%, 47%, 43%, 43%, and 47% at age 23, 24, 25, 26, and 28. So 1984 and 1986 were the only two years he broke 50%. He was ALREADY inefficent in the postseason long before he got hurt.