shut the fukk up u idiot this is just not trueEast Africans are genetically mixed with arab bloodlines. Hence the differences.
these guys read wikipedia only. that is their single source of knowledgeI can tell many of you blokes get out much.
I'm not gonna argue with you im a Kikuyu Kenyan Bantu born and raised there. Bantus, Nilotes, kushytes all in the east. Same body typesBecause most Kenyans are prototypical Bantu blacks, same as blacks in other parts of Africa. They are even called Bantu. Bantu Kenyans are actually older than the Ethiopians and Somalis both. They are what more of East Africa was probably like long enough. Anyway their examples are not proof East Africans like Ethiopians and Somalis can get swole. I'm sure Ethiopians and Somalis can get swole if they want though, as I've seen some swole ones. Their predilection is towards skinniness, but that is the case for most of Africa.
I'm not gonna argue with you im a Kikuyu Kenyan Bantu born and raised there. Bantus, Nilotes, kushytes all in the east. Same body types
You're trying to say only Ethiopians and Somalians are real east Africans now? Or the only ones with that build but I told you otherwise. You seen the Kenyan distance runners. Most are Kalenjin or Kikuyu. So Nilotes and Bantus but both living around the rift valley high altitude planes. Both got that skinny build. Nilotes are also found in south Sudan part of east africa with the skinny build.
It's clearly the physique of the region even for all those groups of black people
So you think the languages just happen to be mixed but the people never did?that's because Somali has loan words from Arabic and Italian, while using latin alphabet. You could argue that Somali culture has been arabized to an extent, but we are not arabs or mixed with arabs. Pure nonsense.
Cushtic Arab mix is not as wide as advertised or the cause of their appearance. That's a common fallacy. One I fight strongly against. These populations have looked the same for their entire existence why are we trying to credit arabs and Berbers when they were late comersPerhaps the environment is the causative factor behind the predilection and selection for long distance running in all these people, but this does not imply the end-all-be-all for East Bantus, Nilotes and Cushytic physiologically. There are notable differences. Nilotics and Bantus tend towards Central/West and Southern blacks. Cushytics more towards Arabs/Berbers.
For example, there are renown soccer players in this group (particularly Nilotes) who are fast, strong, etc athletes (many play in the English Premier League) whereas there are no such Cushytics (who tend towards more finesse positions) in these positions. There are also Nilotes in the NBA who are strong, fast, etc, same as other blacks. But no Cushytics, despite their having a higher population than Nilotes. The proof is in the pudding.
Cushtic Arab mix is not as wide as advertised or the cause of their appearance. That's a common fallacy. One I fight strongly against. These populations have looked the same for their entire existence why are we trying to credit arabs and Berbers when they were late comers
So you think the languages just happen to be mixed but the people never did?
You're quite slow friend.
So if haitins threw some french and African language together and made creole as a result of their encounter with the french does that mean they are mixed because their language is? Or is every African that speaks fluent Swahili mixed?So you think the languages just happen to be mixed but the people never did?
You're quite slow friend.
You bre
So if haitins threw some french and African together and made creole as a result of their encounter with the french does that mean they are mixed because their language is? Or is every African that speaks fluent Swahili mixed?
Failed logic.