I was just having this discussion over the weekend and I feel these apply to adults across whether you are a parent or not as far as how children are viewing the information they get from you.
1. To often today, if people do not live an existence that is 100% "authentic" to the very letter of anything that they have said, especially if what they said was judgemental toward someone else, then they are considered a liar and any and everything they say and believe in does not matter. I think part of the problem is people today typically tend to look to nullify your opinion than to understand your opinion (and by understand I do not mean agree) and there is often a purposeful disregard of nuance. Nuance now is commonly used/accepted when it is beneficial to a person's argument otherwise things are seen in absolutes. You see it here. If person A says "In my day blah blah blah would not have happened", person B can pull up one instance of whatever happening during person A's time and now not only do they consider person A's opinion on the topic to be invalid it is then extrapolated out that person A is full of $hit across the board in anything and they get tuned out. Prime example, and I have seen it on here and on social media, women rappers and sexual/explicit lyrics. An oldhead will say you'd never hear something like that in our time. Inevitably someone pulls up some old timey single recorded in the 20's of a woman using sexually explicit lyrics in her song as a gotcha. If you weren't at a jook joint, or a house party the odds of you hearing that record were nill to none. It was not on the radio. It was not easily heard let alone by kids but nearly anyone without some sort of connection to the artist or where it was recorded. The point is not that the music did not exist but what was the ease of access to hearing that record. You weren't walking down the street and hearing it come from someone's house, you were not going to hear or see kids dancing around to it and you damn sure weren't going have kids listening to it with adults standing around or cheering them on. That is what person A meant and I am willing to bet person B knows that is what was meant but for the sake of nullifying that person's argument, and consequently any other argument that person makes that is the route they took. Because it now can be said "this is the same person that believed women in the 20s weren't making vulgar records" as a way to say they have no clue what they are talking about regarding anything.
2. Past generations, especially in the AA community, are seen as being far less competent by the younger generation and definitely seen as out of touch with the way the world works today. I have often heard, also on here, "Well if y'all were so smart, wise and had all the answers why aren't we in a better condition? Why are we fighting the same battles that you were fighting at my age?" Since that attitude is present the reverence is all but gone. Once the reverence is gone the opportunity to impart anything is damn near gone. You talk to a young adult about financial responsibility you better be doing it from the balcony of your mansion, or driving in your sports car or with latest in fashion or you are pretty much wasting your time because you clearly can't follow your own advice.
3. For boys, yes, a father 1000% percent increases the odds of that young man staying on a positive path. The problem often is that the bar that defines being on "a positive path" gets lowered and who is the father. I got young family members whose main source of income is selling weed (or at least that is what they fessed up to). Because no bs has come to their door, they haven't been arrested, they don't have babies this is considered a win. Given everything I know about them and the state of affairs for AA in this country...I don't agree but I understand why they think that.