Please...dont' water down the term slavery...PLEASE dont.
whatever term makes you happy....I'm talking about legalese.
Please...dont' water down the term slavery...PLEASE dont.
You have yet to answer any of my questions, repackaging and reshaping them into questions I didn't ask that you built not to answer.
You'll accept what you imagined in your head.
Breh, I'm not answering you questions because I disagree with your idea that those who oppress are only of a certain skin color.
Where did I say this?
I said Europeans. If black people came up in Europe, they'd act the same way. The byproduct of living in Europe starting with the weather, created the type of people that came out of there.
I think the bigger point of the last few pages is that European slavery in America is in no way diminished in severity and harm by stating that every 'great' civilization was born and bread of 'some' version of 'slavery'.
Now you're just trolling.
We know what you meant when you mentioned Europeans nikka. fukk outta here. I'm done with your ignorant ass.
Even so, you think only Europeans oppressed?
I think the slavery by "every great civilization" thing is over emphasized by Europeans who want to lighten the dark spotlight that's pointed to them when it comes to the transatlantic slave trade.
Europe was unique in its brand of slavery. No place in human history went to the degrees of how Europeans treated each other and gradually treated everyone else. This was a byproduct of constantly fighting for limited resources due to living in Europe.
Nature plays a huge role on the behavior of Europeans. You had frenchmen putting other Frenchmen "breaking on the wheel," back in the 1200's, a practice later used in chattel slavery.
People need to accept it rather than aligning other empires and the word "slavery" to the practice of Europeans and what took place in the middle ages and beyond.
arab slavery was way worse. But my point is, yeah slavery is fukked up in all sorts of ways, but every single empire in this world, african, asian, european, middle eastern used slavery to build itself up until it got too expensive to keep slaves. This is the same cycle that's been going on forever. This has nothing to do with race, it has everything to do with economics. That is just the history of it. How slaves were treated or what not is besides the point.
Give me examples of Arab slavery being way worse.
Put me on to them. African empires absorbed their captured and didn't display the type of barbaric hardships we saw in middle age europe. I bring up historic references as proof. Either deconstruct them or show me the Africans, other than Shaka Zulu, whose empires grew along those lines.
there was a thread in Higher Learning about Arab Slavery. You can look for that there yourself. Europeans model their slavery techniques after the arabs. If you want an example of african slavery, what you think the pyramids were built with? It's all slavery.
eh, then i'm wrong for that one. no biggie.Bwahahahahahahaha.
I'm a Christian and KNOW that's a lie. There are cities right outside the pyramids which shows that workers....workers built those pyramids, not slaves.
That is one of the biggest lies that continues to be propagated out there.
The pyramids were NOT built on slave labor. I still want to see about Europeans modeling their slave techniques from Arabs considering how they treated their own people.
eh, then i'm wrong for that one. no biggie.
there was a thread in Higher Learning about Arab Slavery. You can look for that there yourself. Europeans model their slavery techniques after the arabs. If you want an example of african slavery, what you think the pyramids were built with? It's all slavery.