Who's the better Quarterback? And whos career was better? Tom Brady or Peyton Manning

[Ashyneezz]

Tom Brady, Patriots, 2007
Regular season (16-0): 398 of 578, 68.9%, 4,806 yards, 8.3 YPA, 50 TD, 8 INT, 117.2 passer rating

Peyton Manning, Colts, 2004
Regular season (12-4): 336 of 497, 67.6%, 4,557 yards, 9.2 YPA, 49 TD, 10 INT, 121.1 rating

The FIRST year Brady got serious weapons, he literally blew the doors off Peyton's best season.(Still the second best season a QB's ever had)

More yards, more TD's, less picks, higher Completion percentage, Perfect record, and the GOAT offense

Hold up so Brady with 81 more attempts only had 249 more yards and 1 more TD than Peyton, Brady's completion % was only 1.3% higher, plus Peyton had the better passer rating and you over here talmbout "blew the doors off"

 

[iamstr8fire]

Going with brady, he usually steps up when it matters Post-season. Mannings probably the front running regular season qb ever

This. Manning is the GOAT front runner.

 

[BLAZO da GAWD]

Hold up so Brady with 81 more attempts only had 249 more yards and 1 more TD than Peyton, Brady's completion % was only 1.3% higher, plus Peyton had the better passer rating and you over here talmbout "blew the doors off"

Would you agree that playing in a dome benefits a QB's numbers and the passing game in general?

That year, Peyton played 10 of his 15 games in a dome. I already hit this point in my first response to this thread. Had Brady played under those same conditions, his numbers his 2007 season would've been even better. Heading into December 2007, Brady was on pace for 60 touchdowns. What slowed him and the passing game down? Blizzards in the northeast.

 

[Lakers Offseason]

Brady had a chance in 06 to make something happen with timeouts and less than a minute left and what happens? A pick. You telling me Manning couldn't have done that? In the first Giants SB...30 seconds all 3 timeouts all you need is a FG...-10yds on the drive. Once again Manning couldn't have done that? In the 2nd Giants SB he had a chance to ice the game and flubbed a pass to a wide open Welker and then got nothing on the last drive of the game. Manning couldn't have...well you get it. The point still stands that the more Brady has been asked to do in order for his team to win the more Manning-like he's looked. The playoff numbers and record over the last 8 years spell it out. The more dependent you are on your QB the less likely you are to win...even in today's QB centric game that stands true.

so you're gonna ignore that he got his team the lead with 3 minutes left in all three games while Manning didnt even give his team a chance in the 4th in the games that he lost? I see where this argument is headed. There ain't no reasoning good enough for you then.

 

[protestor]

Uhh, just a few years ago Matt Cassel made the Pro Bowl....as a Kansas City Chief.

We're gonna act like QBs don't regress? We're gonna act like defenses don't get better playing QBs after there's more film on on them?

The Cassel argument is the shyttiest argument you clowns try to make to shyt on Brady.

matt cassel has always sucked, he didint regress. bottom line, you can cry all you want, brady is another replaceable part in belis system. its already been proven.

 

[BLAZO da GAWD]

matt cassel has always sucked, he didint regress. bottom line, you can cry all you want, brady is another replaceable part in belis system. its already been proven.

Belichick record without Tom Brady: 41-57

 

[Born2BKing]

This is like the question people used to ask: Marino or Montana?

Marino was a better thrower but Montana was a better quarterback.

Peyton is a better thrower but Brady to me is a better quarterback because he makes better decisions on pressure situations. Peyton tries to make the spectacular throws in between defenders while Brady will just dump it off in the flat where there's a hole in the defense. Sometimes those throws Manning tries leads into turnovers or incompletions that kills drives and in the playoffs, that can kill your chances.

You couldn't be more wrong breh

 

[protestor]

Belichick record without Tom Brady: 41-57

Yo, make your point clear, nobody has time to dechiper what your saying. If you want to say belli ain't shy without Brady than say so.

 

[FTBS]

so you're gonna ignore that he got his team the lead with 3 minutes left in all three games while Manning didnt even give his team a chance in the 4th in the games that he lost? I see where this argument is headed. There ain't no reasoning good enough for you then.

You just gonna ignore the instances where Manning had his team in position to win or tie late and nikkas fukked up? You just gonna ignore Tom's fukkups because the team had a lead earlier in the quarter? The point is when a team loses most of the time it's not on the QB, there are other factors that can be pointed to either in spite of or even along with the QBs performance that led to the L. We can dissect different games and talk about what Manning and Brady did and didnt' do all day the point is that in similar situations they have performed similarly. When they had great offensive weapons they both put up huge numbers. When they didn't have weapons that were that great they still put up numbers. When under constant pressure (literally and figuratively) in the playoffs they struggled. When teammates didn't make plays they struggle. They won when their defense played great and they had a balanced offense. The problem is people trying to make it different for one guy because they have an agenda and a mission to prove he's better therefore all facts will be either spun or ignored in order to fit said agenda. I on the other hand just call it how it is. They really aren't that different.

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

matt cassel has always sucked, he didint regress. bottom line, you can cry all you want, brady is another replaceable part in belis system. its already been proven.

Lol, so he goes to the Pro Bowl with lesser receivers than he had in New England and you still want to act like he was always playing at the same level.

This is why you clowns can't be taken seriously. You'll throw hard cold facts out the window just so you can keep repeating the same nonsense over and over.

 

[Born2BKing]

matt cassel has always sucked, he didint regress. bottom line, you can cry all you want, brady is another replaceable part in belis system. its already been proven.

They don't hear you though breh. Bet the Pats don't regress hardly at all once Brady leaves.

 

[Rekkapryde]

Cassel's year without Brady did kinda hurt Brady a little to me. You can make the argument one way or another, but the thing that puts Peyton over to me is you saw what that team did without him in Indy last year vs the year the Pats didn't have Brady.

 

[BLAZO da GAWD]

Yo, make your point clear, nobody has time to dechiper what your saying. If you want to say belli ain't shy without Brady than say so.

did u graduate high school? are u really this dumb?

 

[R.E.N. Spells Ren]

Cassel's year without Brady did kinda hurt Brady a little to me. You can make the argument one way or another, but the thing that puts Peyton over to me is you saw what that team did without him in Indy last year vs the year the Pats didn't have Brady.

You think that has anything to do with the fact that Brady was replaced by a guy who would play in Hawaii, while Peyton was replaced by scrubs?

 

[BLAZO da GAWD]

You think that has anything to do with the fact that Brady was replaced by a guy who would play in Hawaii, while Peyton was replaced by scrubs?

their logic never makes sense

its two independent cases, 2 separate ppl. how does cassell sucking 4 years later prove brady is overrated. literally makes no sense. where is the correlation