you plug the device in, and hook it up to a controller and a TV
Who was that breh that kept saying...
you plug the device in, and hook it up to a controller and a TV
firemanBk
The Manslayer
If anything, recent revenues have shown that mobile, console and PC gaming can all co-exist and make a shyt ton of money. More people are playing and spending on games than ever before, rather than the same amount of people playing and spending and moving to a different platform.
Then it is no longer a portable gaming device.
That's as substantive as your gonna get for that dumb ass shyt you posted
That's as substantive as your gonna get for that dumb ass shyt you posted
Flummoxed ass nikka 
Post a failed device as proof of mobile gaming taking over consoles brehs
Post a failed device as proof of mobile gaming taking over consoles brehs
I never said mobile would over take consoles...if you'd fukking read. I said they'd change the landscape and overtake handhelds. I also said the Switch, which is NOT a failure, is an indicator of Nintendo basically cutting their losses (if they had any) on handheld. I said also that because of this consoles (as they are made now) would change because of this trend.
At no point did I say mobile would over take console.
Reading. Is. Fundamental.
my point is it's one device that could do all this
I'm not trying to say that mobile gaming is gonna take over. I'm just saying that in the future it won't be necessary to buy all these separate machines to play video games. we're already seeing smart TV's with capabilities to play some games. but I'm not saying things will necessarily go in that direction either. just that there's already efforts to consolidate all this tech, plus the ability to do more with less space as tech evolves
One device "could" do it. Sure the technology has been available for decades. The reason it hasn't been done and I don't think it will goes back to the priorities/foucus of the manufacturer. There is no incentive for apple to spend significant money putting console capabilities and content on their phones, just like there's no incentive for Sony to put a phone or Microsoft office on their PlayStation devices.
The markets are separate enough that both can and do serve their customers needs without chasing after the other market.
I think there will always be dedicated gaming devices. They may look different or there may be less of them going forward, but I don't think we will ever get to a place where you buy an iPhone 15 to replace your PC and your console.
Landscape has not changed. People are buying more consoles today than they did in the past when mobile gaming wasn't a thing.
Nintendo had no losses to cut with the 3ds it was a VERY successful device and continues to be very successful despite mobile gamings popularity.
The switch is a response to the 3ds success, not the success of mobile games.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2013
- Messages
- 31,583
- Reputation
- -10,533
- Daps
- 21,816
- Reppin
- The Original Rec Room Gang
That's a reach at best bruhapparently consoles are a dedicated pornhub device
these are all minor distinctions IMO. my point is people are trying to say that 'mobile' gaming is very different because of reasons that can easily be overcome
I think the strongest argument is that these console makers fund exclusive games. but I think that is also an antiquated model, since it's been shown that there's plenty of money to be made with multiplat games, and even self-published games
An indie game has a better chance at being successful on PC than Madden NFL 18. Yes you can point to 1 indie dev out of every 10,000 that made a hit. Can't ignore my Madden comment because somebody created angry birds.
I am a real gamer, and since you wanna have a convo, sit your dumbass down & let's continue
All you are saying is mobile gaming makes money. You all emotional about that so you think we ever debated that 
you think because of that all of gaming will gravitate to that.But you don't game on mobile, so you understand damn well how that isn't the future of gaming. Will gaming be portable in the future? Probably as technology shrinks its only naturalthat it'll be on the go, virtual and augmented realities.
Now you being app eager to be right will take that as you are correct once phones introduce AR but you'd still be wrong. Unless FPS games are AR ready, then don't expect this shift you talking about to happen anytime soon. Maybe in 2030 we can revisit. If you don't agree then what's your excuse...
2 Up 2 Down
Veteran
Madden is a multiplatform game though. it's not on PC for various reasons, but it could beThat's a reach at best bruh
An indie game has a better chance at being successful on PC than Madden NFL 18. Yes you can point to 1 indie dev out of every 10,000 that made a hit. Can't ignore my Madden comment because somebody created angry birds.
First off, where is this "people said Pokemon go wouldn't work" coming from? Who told you Pokemon anything wouldn't work? Slap that nikka and his mama
2ndly, it's like you ignored what I said because your opinion is so strong. But let me reel you back in. You yourself don't game on mobile, the reason for that is the reason why you're incorrect
We all are aware that candy crush is popular amongst woman, worldwide, and it works on all models of cellphones so that is why it does so well. Because it's a game You can play for 5min or 50min but you'd only play it on your phone. Nobody would be playing candy crush on a console tho, use logic bruh.
I didn't look at the list because I'm a gamer so I already know what's popular. It ain't console styled games. Just because a bytch wants to play candy crush and her kid wants to catch them all does not mean the 1-200 million console gamers wanna know game on the go. I feel foolish gaming outside of my living room, but I'm a G, I fukk bytches, smoke blunts, scratch my balls then will give my fingers the smell testonly way I'm gaming on the go is if it's in AR
But what happened to u speaking in one liners motherfukker