"White liberals are the most racist people"-Ben Carson
- Thread starter Dusty Bake Activate
- Start date
co-sign and people EAT IT UP. We can't get jack fukking shyt done in this country because it's always a personal battle between liberals and conservatives, because we have a retarded ass 2-party system. If we had proportional representation A LOT more varied parties would be represented as opposed to just 2.
AV Dicey
All Star
good guy, conservative, got gassed up, got into the ring and proceeded to leave all manner of openings for the other side to get their shots, politics at a prayer breakfast and calling teh gheys pedos and beastialists? thats just too easy, then going to talk radio and going off on blacks still being on plantations = dog whistle = blacks tuning you out on gp.
He needs better advisors, because the left dont play, even cain (former ceo) and R Money (son of guvnah, former ceo and guvnah) are caricutures of themselves, Newt held the 3rd highest position in gvt and had the huevos to orchestrate an impeachment of the potus, now he's just a fat slob with an airhead for a wife. The good Dr will fukk around with them fukk arounds and he'll fukk around and get ternt into Alan Keyes
He needs better advisors, because the left dont play, even cain (former ceo) and R Money (son of guvnah, former ceo and guvnah) are caricutures of themselves, Newt held the 3rd highest position in gvt and had the huevos to orchestrate an impeachment of the potus, now he's just a fat slob with an airhead for a wife. The good Dr will fukk around with them fukk arounds and he'll fukk around and get ternt into Alan Keyes
Why's that? Because you don't agree with it?
And correct me if Im wrong but I dont believe Carson is running for office.
These views are though
Not comparing them but this is like saying "all Hitlers views were not bad, whats the big deal". Nobody's entire world view is bad
They call it a tabloid account and "backstairs gossip." By definition, both of those terms call its authenticity into question. People don't use those words for well-researched, substantiated accounts. And he himself doesn't have to lie or fabricate anything.
http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/gossip
http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/english/tabloid
What's more absurd is you trying to discount a clear majority of reviews that all say the same thing as the Publisher's Weekly review. You know why user reviews exist, right?
Both the Publisher's Weekly review and most of the user reviews challenged it.
One is a matter of fact statement that happens to involve casual racial slurs, the other one is a cynical political statement (at least the way it was originally posted) that supports the idea that Democrats schemed to entice Blacks with policy that wasn't meant to help them. The latter claim is much stronger, and thus in need of more substantiation than the former.
This wasn't an investigative journalist account. At this point you're just being obstinate. It's very possible, and just straight up true, that you can be an investigative journalist and write one or two pop gossip books that aren't consistent with your other works. I see you pointing to his other work as a way to evade what is very obviously different about this one when you directly and objectively look at it.
Kessler doesn't need to be the one fabricating. And now you're suggesting that it's "unlikely" for people to fabricate things about their political colleagues or former bosses? We both know that's a laughable claim.
Regardless, the rumor could also have started without direct fabrication, and have been reported by someone who heard it. There are many ways claims like these can emerge and spread.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2012
- Messages
- 42,423
- Reputation
- 3,805
- Daps
- 152,090
- Reppin
- black love, unity, and music
So next time you or a family member needs surgery, have one of your genius atheist liberal friends preform it instead of the idiot Christian world renowned neurosurgeon.
Broke Wave
The GOAT
So next time you or a family member needs surgery, have one of your genius atheist liberal friends preform it instead of the idiot Christian world renowned neurosurgeon.
This is a logical fallacy... none of these things are mutually exclusive... just because someone is a brilliant doctor, that does not necessarily make them equipped to be an expert in any other field.
filial_piety
Banned
There is a vested interest in maintaining blacks as a monolithic voting block, even by these so-called intellectuals of the board. It's really a pul-pit to obliterate any divergence of opinions on issues that goes against the cow towing of the party line.
Quite simply it's disgusting, and regressive to any type of meaningful discussion. I personally prefer city-data where there is far more balance and discourse.
Other than that I simply pop in once in a while for the fukkery
Broke Wave
The GOAT
There is a vested interest in maintaining blacks as a monolithic voting block, even by these so-called intellectuals of the board. It's really a pul-pit to obliterate any divergence of opinions on issues that goes against the cow towing of the party line.
Quite simply it's disgusting, and regressive to any type of meaningful discussion. I personally prefer city-data where there is far more balance and discourse.
Other than that I simply pop in once in a while for the fukkery
so would you support proprotional representation voting?
Proportional representation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
AV Dicey
All Star
...and for 8 yrs in the white house, they probably have a legitimate claim for another 200 yrs of loyalty (more like 50 yrs in today's entitlement culture)...we got in before the jews too
Those puma's exposed themselves tho, which should be a warning to all you pawg luvahs
Her inability to beat Obama in 08 should also serve as a warning for Hillary 2016 or bust
There is a vested interest in maintaining blacks as a monolithic voting block, even by these so-called intellectuals of the board. It's really a pul-pit to obliterate any divergence of opinions on issues that goes against the cow towing of the party line.
Quite simply it's disgusting, and regressive to any type of meaningful discussion. I personally prefer city-data where there is far more balance and discourse.
Other than that I simply pop in once in a while for the fukkery
So basically what you're suggesting is that we blindly ride for Dr. C, and support his absurd, offensive, and laughably false statements, all in the name of promoting this undefined political diversity, which is really just transparent far right wing self-interest that we've collectively rejected in the first place.
I know you and your ilk are frustrated at the condition of conservative america, but instead of encouraging an accomplished man like Dr. C to act like a ventriloquist dummy for the anti-anything-but-white-male teabaggin express, why not challenge him to elevate a principled conservatism and discourse that can engage not enrage? Fck kind of offering is "the democrat plantation"? The right's stumbling attempt to grow their party, by only spotlighting black supporters who sound like Sean Hannity, is proving another humiliating fail. But of course, its our fault.
theworldismine13
God Emperor of SOHH
but again they they do not accuse him of lying, they are very careful in what they say because they can get sued for lying and libel and kessler himself can get sued
by definition investigative journalists use iffy sources sometimes, just like woodward has been accused of the same thing, but at the end of the day nobody is suing people like woodward or kessler because publishers have lawyers and editors that go through all the claims
user reviews exist for the same reason the coli exists, its a place where people can express their views, but a user review on amazon is not any more credible than you or any poster's opinion, you might as well say the majority of HL posters think it s a fabrication
im not following why does one require more substantiation than the other one, they are both consistent with the way johnson was known to talk, and i i think you are confused, in both cases involved johnson trying to help black people in return for their votes, in fact in the youtube video he is saying that they cannot prove discrimination, so apparently he was trying to accuse texan republicans of blocking the black vote
so aside from him using the word ****** there isnt anything particularly racist about the statements, it just shows a white cynical a$$hole president from texas trying to win and cling on to power, the statement is very consistent with johnson
the fact is he is an investigative journalist, the fact that you dont like his quotes doesnt make him not an investigate journalist
im not avoiding anything, im using people's past writings to assert that this book is also credible, which is how you build credibility
im just pointing out the theoretical possibility that any book, not just kessler's can have fabricated quotes but at the end of the day anybody that thinks kessler is lying is more than welcome to sue in court
His statement is pretty true, people just assume its malicious racism and it isnt.
Most liberals are misguided and don't realize their attempts at helping, or showing 'they care' end up doing more damage than good.
Most liberals are misguided and don't realize their attempts at helping, or showing 'they care' end up doing more damage than good.