I'm not on any high horse, I'm just being logical. You and a lot of other people in this thread have an extremely narrow and simplistic definition of the word "influential." Let me ask you this, do you know the names of the people who took part in the invention of the internet? Probably not off top, but they're a lot more influential to peoples' lives than Madonna or Bruce Springsteen.
Name recognition does not equal influence. If you want to play the name recognition game, Rihanna is more influential than 2Pac by that criteria. She sold more records and is more popular worldwide. So is Beyonce. 2Pac's work was obviously of a greater creative depth than those two, but let's be real...he was a fukking rapper. I know Pac stans often try to act like he was Jesus, Moses, MLK, Gandhi, Muhammad, Malcolm X, William Wallace, Nat Turner, Monster Kody, and Shakespeare all rolled into one, though.
Musicians can influence peoples' moods for better or worse, and provide inspiration and pleasurable leisure activity. But at the end of the day, your life would essentially be the exact same way in terms of the major aspects: employment, education, career, degree of happiness, family situation, etc. if they never existed. Pac or no other musician had nowhere near the influence on peoples' lives in a tangible sense anybody on the list I named. He didn't help alter the consciousness of an entire nation like MLK or X, or provide the legal groundwork to end Jim Crow like Carter G. Woodson, or create a system of blood banks that saved countless lives like Charles Drew.
There was a thread on sohh similar to this a while back and some people were naming 2Pac, Michael Jackson, Michael Jordan, etc.
They are not the most influential...just the most popular. White people want you to believe they are, though.