If its about loyalty why dont AD stay in NO
Loyalty Demanding a trade
So signing a 6’8 27 year old wing who played at least 72 games year in all but his second season and who was throwing up 20/5/4 with great %’s for the prior 3 years was a bad idea because he broke his leg after they signed him?????
LMAO
They did need him. People were calling brown a bust and Tatum hadn’t even suited so. They were kissing a good wing player.it was a bad idea before they signed him.
you gonna act like we weren't on here criticizing the signing months before he broke his leg?
they didn't need dude. they just signed him cuz hes brad Stevens' guy and they wanted a white all-star in boston.
I hope they get bounced in the 1st round.
that was all it doing. Trying to impress cacs by playing thru injury. Not knowing no team was giving him 200 mill cause at the end of the day he was a 5’9 scoring first pglook anyone would have traded irving for thomas but its how the celts did it. They cost dude mad money and now isaiah is almost 30 with a bad hip and will be lucky to get anything more than the vet min next year or even a nba deal.
Man what kind of shyt is this? First, when did the Lakers try to trade Bean other than at his request? Second, so are you going to bring up every trade for every team? Because there’s a “loyalty issue” with every trade if that’s the case. Every situation isn’t the same. Thomas ruined his hip to do everything for the team and they traded him a couple of months later.And the Lakers even tried to trade him.
Speaking of the Lakers, how loyal were they to Lamar Odom when he lost a family member and was in a fatal car accident and they STILL tried to trade him for CP3 and when it fell through sold his ass to Dallas?
Oh that was different
Sleazy "business" practices cost organizations benificial partnerships all the time in the real world..... You want to operate your organization in a callous and exploitative fashion... Thats your choice... However don't complain about the repercussions of your "businesses" decisions
Ainge led him to believe he was gonna be kept
Told him that it was worth playing through injury and risking his body, because the celtics could attract free agents like Gordon Hayward to play with him
Only for Ainge to ship him off for Kyrie the second he was available
I mean, we’ve been over it, can you imagine how F’d the Cs would be right now if they stayed “loyal” to IT?....
LA dumped Odom like garbage once he was done being useful to them and left him to fukkin die but Ainge is literally Hitler for sending IT to the team that was just in the Finals that season. Does any franchise have a more shameless, frontrunning "fanbase"??
"B-b-b-b-u BAWSTON RACIST THO!!!!111 LA NOT RACIST AT ALL1!!!!"
LeBron James responds to 'n-word' slur: Racism is 'part of America'
Yea keep talkin bout that idyllic gentrified exhibition y'all got over there, no racism in sight I'm sure
I wouldn’t have maxed IT either.
fukk em though. Kyrie is gonna have those cacs walking on eggshells around him for the next 5 months.
Someone check on Bill Simmons. He’s been trying to speak this AD trade into existence for years.
The Celtics were right Business wise to not give him the max.
The issue is they ran dude into the ground and made his injury worse and then discarded him. That’s what players are mostly upset about.
Revisionist history. Hayward would have got that contract from ANY teamit was a bad idea before they signed him.
you gonna act like we weren't on here criticizing the signing months before he broke his leg?
they didn't need dude. they just signed him cuz hes brad Stevens' guy and they wanted a white all-star in boston.
I hope they get bounced in the 1st round.