Wack100: Tory Lanez’s lawyer has video proof that Tory didn’t shoot Megan Thee Stallion.

[T. Dubb Ya]

IIRC possession and reckless discharge are still in play even if it wasn't a direct shot

Not to mention Tory is a convicted felon.. He no business being around guns.

 

[Jazzy B.]

Here u go. One of his charges

"assault with a semiautomatic handgun".

You don't understand the law


Him simply aiming the gun at her and not firing would still be deemed as "assault"


Tory didn't need to fire a single bullet at Megan nor did they need to prove he did for him to be got on an assault charge


If he was charged for shooting Megan a battery charge would have been included with the assault charge. It wasn't.

 

[Heretic]

Wack is the Dr. Dre of videotapes.

 

[Ol’Otis]

nikka got more tape than Scotch

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

WTF

 

[EndDomination]

Right. Leak the video and public backlash will get him freed. Politicians and billionaires would step in etc. It would be a wrap for Megan.

Yeah, that Tory Lanez caucus is powerful

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[mag357]

WTF

I mean anyone with a brain pretty much could figure out what happened.
But nobody cares about black men
So goal post will be moved.
Alot of somehow blaming Tory for something. Being alive, being short, being bald, hanging out with women, arguing, etc

But I'm pretty sure actual footage will come out in some years.
There's cameras everywhere.

But that innocent man will still be in prison

 

[EndDomination]

I'm trying to figure out if I'm the only one that understood what wack was saying.
Or am I the only one that misunderstood.

Torys legal team and A friend of wack has seen the footage. They don't have the footage because the owner won't release to them

If they've been allowed to view the footage, then they can absolutely subpoena the minor owner of the video as well as their parents - and either request: 1) testimony in camera; 2) an affidavit authenticating the video and chain of custody; 3) have them testify openly just for the purposes of authenticating the video.

You can't just withhold evidence when both parties are aware of it

 

[EndDomination]

"I wanted to present testimony at trial * * *" bullshyt
The prosecutor isn't the only party that could have called him at trial.

If he has exculpatory testimony, as an eye witness who was identified by the state and the defense prior to the trial - he should have been called by the defense.

Unless Tory plans on filing an IAC (ineffective assistance of counsel) claim or believes he has some other grounds for post-conviction relief, he's stuck.

 

[The Wolf Among You]

WTF

Dude is already lying.
The defense counsel himself confirmed that he didn’t call on him because he deemed his testimony not conclusive to the defenses case. The fukking DA asked for a continuance in order to prepare for his testimony which Tory’s defense declined.

 

[It is a mystery]

 

[MicIsGod]

This was and will always be the common sense story. He couldn’t testify because Tory touched the gun too and that alone was enough for his charges. Meg should fry for that story she came up with. They both technically caused the gun to go off, But Kelsey introduced the weapon into the equation.

 

[The Wolf Among You]

This was and will always be the common sense story. He couldn’t testify because Tory touched the gun too and that alone was enough for his charges. Meg should fry for that story she came up with. They both technically caused the gun to go off, But Kelsey introduced the weapon into the equation.

Where does Sean Kelly fit in all of this?
Seeing as though he was the defense’s witness after all.

 

[MicIsGod]

Where does Sean Kelly fit in all of this?
Seeing as though he was the defense’s witness after all.

Changed his story. Never would’ve been called up by the defense if he was gonna say that.