Classic. But it’s such a massive game idk if I could sit through it again.
5/5.
Crazy how both RDR games are Rockstar's best narratively
Good points. The only thing that really felt forced to me was how kind everybody in Dutch's gang was to Tilly, Charles, and Lenny (R.I.P.).
In a group full of rednecks, nobody showed any ?
That part didn't pass the realism test.
Play 2 first, then 1
S Tier fukk nikkaThe only guys that's really shown any signs of being racist are bill and bytch ass micah
I think the opposite will happen, you'll play 2 and hate the controls, then you 'll play 1 (which was before R* started jerking themselves off over realism in their games) and find the controls much snappier and the game much more fun to playI know how they line up chronologically, I just don't want a drop in gameplay quality to affect the experience. Or will it not matter?
I didn't want more racism in the game, & I don't know how you guys got that from what I wrote. All I said was that it wasn't realistic that a bunch of southern whites in the late 1800's would be so kind to the Black characters. The devs even wrote in lines for Lenny to say the same thing during the mission where he gets drunk with Arthur.5/5, easily. One of the easiest games to lose hours to. Story is absolutely heartbreaking when you consider both what happens in RDR1, and the belief that you could see RDR2 is a game about the old RockStar falling apart.
It's because they're not weighted down by the expectation that there needs to be heavy satire and humor elements like in GTA. They low key tried heading that direction with GTA IV, but folks weren't really fukking with it.
Ayo, this take is WILD. Don't think I've ever seen brehs ask for MORE racism in a game.
It won't matter, I'd even argue you'll find that 1 feels better than 2I know how they line up chronologically, I just don't want a drop in gameplay quality to affect the experience. Or will it not matter?
If you ain't get to these yet just play 1.Still haven't played it, I'll get to it eventually
Still undecided if I should play the first one beforehand or not
The game is realistic to a faultI never understood the sluggish controls argument.
This isn't an FPS so I never expected it to perform like CoD. And the game holds your hand, by default, when shooting. Gameplay gets extremely easy once you get used to it. I was sniping snipers with pistols, on horseback.
All that hand holding goes away in pvp- online mode. That's when the controls go to shyt, on the console.
I think the opposite will happen, you'll play 2 and hate the controls, then you 'll play 1 (which was before R* started jerking themselves off over realism in their games) and find the controls much snappier and the game much more fun to play
It won't matter, I'd even argue you'll find that 1 feels better than 2
Also 1 has a better story than 2 and you may feel soured or annoyed having to go back in time after seeing that story
If you ain't get to these yet just play 1.
2 is a whole ass Odyssey.
I do agree that going from 2 to 1 will be better gameplay wise but you'll probably be burned out at the end of 2.
Play Red Dead Redemption first because controls and gameplay change massively in Red dead 2Still haven't played it, I'll get to it eventually
Still undecided if I should play the first one beforehand or not
5 Star.
Rockstar need to go ahead and make a movie or TV series.