Unpopular Wrestling Opinions Thread
- Thread starter FreshAIG
- Start date
The Prince of All Saiyans
Formerly Jisoo Stan & @Twitter
realJoker Sting is the most cringeworthy gimmick of all time and tarnished whatever was left of his legacy after joining TNA. His fans have tried to sweep it under the rug but no other legend would've gotten a pass for that abomination of a storyline.
Beautiful Bobby Eatin
SWEEEEEEEEEETNESS!
Its why im not even bothering though I get what @FreshAIG was trying to do here
SteelCitySoldier
TSC Fantasy Football Champion 2016
It's funny how people's opinion are considered trolling. Believe it or not there are people out there who don't like Bret Hart, or Undertaker. From what I have seen so far there aren't many trolls in this particular sub forum so I believe it. I been watching wrestling since Taker's debut at Survivor Series and I never thought he was a great wrestler, he can put on great matches with the right people but put him in there and ask him to carry a match and it will be shyt. For every great Taker match I promise you I can show you two shytty ones. You can't say that about the "greats" in wrestling.
The irony coming from someone like you
The idiot said undertaker didnt have a 2 star match during his first deadman run, thats just incredibly stupid
Well name them instead throwing mud and hiding
Gladly, before i do. I need to know what years do YOU consider his first deadman run....
Its widely acknowledge that from 92 to 97 UT was putting on worst match of the year candidates. His match with Sid at 13(which I was there live) is still one of the worst WM main events ever. I'm saying nothing about his gimmick which is one of the best. From an in ring standpoint he was god awful. He matches only started to get better when he worked with the likes of Hart, HBK, and Austin. Now please tell me this really great Taker matches from that period
A lot of tge internet seem to think HHH is an average or decent worker. Aside from a few points in his career hes a very good worker and a good promo guy that brings beliwvability to his promos. Not that hes a legit tough guy, but his promos usually are plausible and not cartoonish "I love being the bad guy" goofy heel shyt that doesnt even get heat (Ziggler, Del Rio). He was overpushed but is a very good talent nonetheless.
As a kid I thought Golsberg was a way more believable badass than Austin, with his weird physique, weak looking punch kick offense, and never showing any athleticism/explosiveness/strength.
Smarks enjoyment of the product based on whos getting pushed and wins is goofy. If smarks truly just watch for quality then DB losing in a great opener against Kofi or beating Cena in a great main event shouldnt really matter.
Barry Windham was not some hidden gem, cant believe Mr Sam said he was a better worker than Flair. Watch their 87 time limit draw, Flair carries it and everything he does from selling to offense looks way better.
Cena is an all time great on the mic
Kurt Angle was not very good until around his face turn, and didnt get great until tge SD six era
Benoit, Jericho, HBK, and Eddie arent good arguments against thr idea that smaller guys dont draw well, they are proof of it if anything. A true "smart" fan shouldnt care as long as theyre getting screentime anyway.
As a kid I thought Golsberg was a way more believable badass than Austin, with his weird physique, weak looking punch kick offense, and never showing any athleticism/explosiveness/strength.
Smarks enjoyment of the product based on whos getting pushed and wins is goofy. If smarks truly just watch for quality then DB losing in a great opener against Kofi or beating Cena in a great main event shouldnt really matter.
Barry Windham was not some hidden gem, cant believe Mr Sam said he was a better worker than Flair. Watch their 87 time limit draw, Flair carries it and everything he does from selling to offense looks way better.
Cena is an all time great on the mic
Kurt Angle was not very good until around his face turn, and didnt get great until tge SD six era
Benoit, Jericho, HBK, and Eddie arent good arguments against thr idea that smaller guys dont draw well, they are proof of it if anything. A true "smart" fan shouldnt care as long as theyre getting screentime anyway.
I never said he had classics, YOU said that he didnt have matches better than 2 stars
Name them instead of backpedaling. I just laid out a great argument that you tried to label as trolling while you are in here saying dumb shyt like Hart isn't top ten or Jarrett is on of the greatest heels. I dont consider his matches with Giant Gonzales, Yokozuna, "Fake Undertaker", Mabel, and random members of the Dibiase stable anything above 2 stars.( and thats honestly being generous) Please enlighten me to something I'm missing
So for 5 years the undertaker never had more had a match better than 2*. You named 5 matches.
His whole makind feud was dope, but you're an idiot. So you just say random stupid things
Boiler Room Broil wasnt a 2* match brehs
