Unpopular Wrestling Opinions Thread

[The G.O.D II]

So for 5 years the undertaker never had more had a match better than 2*. You named 5 matches.

His whole makind feud was dope, but you're an idiot. So you just say random stupid things

Boiler Room Broil wasnt a 2* match brehs

Those were hes main feuds at that time dumb ass. LOL@some gimmick boiler room match with them beating each other with pipes and shooting fake steam in their faces for 20+minutes being the best you can come up with. Meanwhile HBK was having 5 star bouts with Foley at the next PPV. And you wonder why ppl compare you to R=G

 

[Silkk]

Those were hes main feuds at that time dumb ass. LOL@some gimmick boiler room match with them beating each other with pipes and shooting fake steam in their faces for 20+minutes being the best you can come up with. Meanwhile HBK was having 5 star bouts with Foley at the next PPV. And you wonder why ppl compare you to R=G

What in the hell does this have to do with HBK? Answer That

Mankind wasnt his main feud? You are an idiot. Lmao at them using weapons being your "reason" for it not being more than a 2* match

 

[The G.O.D II]

What in the hell does this have to do with HBK? Answer That

Mankind wasnt his main feud? You are an idiot. Lmao at them using weapons being your "reason" for it not being more than a 2* match

Its called comparison to upper level talent. Undertaker putting on gimmicky bore fest with no psychology while a a normal singles match by Michaels with the same opponent is MOTY candidate. And I was talking about those combined years not just 96. Them using weapons isn't the only reason that match sucked. It was slow, plodding, and wack. A typical mid 90s WWF brawl. There is a reason you didn't hardly ever see another one. But are you going to name any other matches or are you going to keep going around in semantics?

 

[Silkk]

Its called comparison to upper level talent. Undertaker putting on gimmicky bore fest with no psychology while a a normal singles match by Michaels with the same opponent is MOTY candidate. And I was talking about those combined years not just 96. Them using weapons isn't the only reason that match sucked. It was slow, plodding, and wack. A typical mid 90s WWF brawl. There is a reason you didn't hardly ever see another one. But are you going to name any other matches or are you going to keep going around in semantics?

Are you saying the boiler room brawl wasnt a 2* match? yes or no is all thats needed

 

[Kang Deezy]

I'm gonna step in here;

BOILER ROOM BRAWL WAS GARBAGE.

 

[Silkk]

Merry Christmas fakkit:umadR=G?:

 

[The G.O.D II]

 

[Notorious 1 E.Y.E.]

Jeff Jarrett one of the greatest heels of all time

so its not just me

double j knows how to draw heat

 

[Notorious 1 E.Y.E.]

this isnt unpopular tho. most give him credit as a worker, the consensus is that his character is poor, and he's overpushed .

his original sd run was fukking awesome
the character went to trash once he got "traded" to raw

 

[dh86]

HHH is the single worst guy Vince (Jr or Sr) ever presented as the #1 guy

 

[dh86]

Oh shyt I forgot Diesel existed lol, you get my point tho

 

[Henzo]

2009 DX >>>> any other iteration of DX except for the original 1997 version

I could go into a tangent on my reasons but this is a list thread so I'll refrain

 

[Silkk]

2009 DX >>>> any other iteration of DX except for the original 1997 version

I could go into a tangent on my reasons but this is a list thread so I'll refrain

Nah go ahead

 

[Henzo]

Nah go ahead

In a nutshell it told the best story out of all the DX incarnations.. It came full circle.

Plus it had the best matches match-for-match out of any of the incarnations

 

[Henzo]

The Rockers have the best body of work for a tag team in WWE history