The capital gains tax rate is progressive, big only the rich pay capital gains tax and only the rich prefer to not make an income and only make money through capital gains (Romney)
I have heard this argument on both sides. Someone advocating for lower capital gains taxes said if capital gains tax rates are too close to income tax rates people won't invest. Now you're saying the opposite. Both are wrong. Nobody, not even the rich, can flip a switch and change where their income is from to match whatever is cheaper tax wise. If I have a job, and capital gains taxes are lower, I can't all of a sudden quit my job and switch to dividend income. Likewise if I am Mitt Romney, and I have a revenue stream from a dividend on a stock I bought 10 years ago, I can't turn that money into a job if capital gains taxes go up. That is a bogus problem.
You are right that trickle down economics don't work. But you said "15% doesn't create any trickle down", like a higher rate would. No rate creates trickle down, trickle down doesn't work.What I mean by trickle down is under Clinton the Cap gains tax was 20%, Bush cut it down to 15 % with the idea that the more money the rich have in their pocket they will use it to create jobs and reinvest in the economy (supply side/ Trickle down economics)
It encourages risk taking because instead of taking profits and invest them in labor physical assets, etc. You can gamble in the market becaus if you lose you get to use the loss as a deduction to taxable income and if you when you only get taxed at 15%
Who is taking this risk you keep claiming low capital gains tax rates encourage? Investors? Companies?