Temp doesn't matter. Check the nx video
TRUSTED SONY SERGEANT FATBOI EXPOSES SATANIC XBOT PLAN TO MANIPULATE PUBLIC OPINION: DISGUSTING
- Thread starter ItWasWritten
- Start date
I'm placing my bets on them being the same price.
People from both sides are downplaying the memory solution of the ps5. Xbots think it's not a big deal, but a good chunk of the development cost went into it so there has to be something there to show for. Sony stans are flat out ignoring the innovation of the memory solution and are jumping to the conclusion that the system will be cheaper due to the worse APU, but trying new things cost money so the budget is most likely the same.
Time will tell if their gamble pays off, but that presentation set them off to a very bad start.
Will do
So the CPU and GPU can’t be working at max speed simultaneously, so devs will have to make choices they won’t have to make on the Xbox.
spliz
SplizThaDon
Not really. Each game uses different resources to achieve it’s goals. It’s something the console will automatically do. For instance. A game like Assassin’s Creed Odyssey is naturally very CPU intensive so the console would automatically boost up the CPU. A game like RE3 Remake is more GPU intensive so the console would do the opposite.
Doesn’t matter that is automatic. The devs will have to know what performance they are gonna get, and they can’t get max out of both at the same time, so they have to consider that when they are optimizing the games.
Watched it. Sounds good, and I agree with him, Cerny did a shyt job of explaining it. That still doesn't negate the alleged heat concerns. If the heat isn't dealt with properly, it will not do the full 10 TF. Again, Cerny should never do these again. It looks even more Juelzy after understanding it all the way. Also, if ANYTHING goes wrong with this new SSD setup, they're fukked, since that's the supposed secret to maxing it out. My guess is third party games won't make use of it, therefore play worse on PS5. How much? Who knows?
That's the problem Sony might run into.
What if developers just forgo the whole process and create games to run how they do on xbox and pc. Then they're left with a weaker system with an innovative memory solution that goes unused out side of exclusive titles.
Last edited:
Brief Keef
Superstar
yea what he said was wild people do buy exclusives.....now if they mean like lets say ps4 user base is 50 million people how come all 50 million didnt buy GOW OR HZD then i get...but to say people dont buy exclusives is foolishMost people don't buy exclusives?
nikka, some of the best selling PS4 games ARE exclusives and some of the BEST games are exclusives, the fukk are you talking about? Just because GTA V or COD sells gangbusters each year doesn't mean exclusives aren't being bought. Spin it this way, do exclusives not sell? Something not selling like GTA V doesn'tt mean it's a failure.
This list here since I know you'll post it shows that the best selling games are the SAME guys each year.
COD, whatever GTA is out and another rockstar game and the sport game. Battlefield comes in last. On top of that this was based on DOLLAR sales not units and only included the US.
You're completely wrong with this "exclusives don't sell" lie.
Sony doesn't want to be at the same price as MSFT. This is why
1.) They are struggling with higher BOM
They aimed for 399 with out including logistics and marketing, it's rumored to be 450+ now. MSFT has the higher BOM currently. If we are to go by Bloomberg article.
2.) In the same article, it's rumored Sony is waiting on MSFT to see what they launch at. Contrary to last gen, were Sony new at e3 they were gonna go with 399, regardless of MSFT due to PS3. But they admitted when MSFT said 499 they were estatic. ( It's in an interview some where. I'll have to find it )
Personal opinion, Sony has not YET shown why the SSD technology is worth being the same price as series x.Luckily, we are just getting started and games have yet to be shown. Everyone understands "the world's most power ful console". It sells itself. I feel Sony would do less than stellar at the same price point , if they do not do a better job of justifying it.
Also, it's looking like a recession is coming and both consoles may have to deal with that. But , rumors are MSFT has Lockhart up it's sleeve so they may be better prepared for an economic downturn.
What happen to all that RDNA 2 talk?
Did they even mention Ray tracing at all?
sony plz
Did they even mention Ray tracing at all?
sony plz
What happen to all that RDNA 2 talk?
Did they even mention Ray tracing at all?
sony plz
Sony didn’t “simply incorporate” an AMD RDNA 2 GPU into the PS5, it helped build it
I don't understand there marketing....
Not sure who left the playstation family but they are saying a bunch of stuff in a round about way to fans. Sounds like they have something based on or built off RDNA2 but isn't exactly that but they are calling it that since that's "basically" or almost what it is
It's nothing, they just went first with the deep dive. The PS4 had this exact same deep dive but they had it after the initial February reveal.
It's a customized RDNA 2.
I’ve answered my own question. PS3 had to play catchup with Xbox 360, due to the 1 year head-start plus the superior online, but I wanted to know how the PS3 60GB fared. Copping the PS3 Day 1, it was a zoo purchasing it, sold out everywhere. Wasn’t researching sales then, I had no idea the system didn’t move at all in the US. Once Sony did the $100 price drop, then it’s started to sell very well.
The reason I’m bringing this up is Sony fans, me included, used to always bring up the $599 price point as a counterpoint to the PS5 selling regardless, which is incorrect. After the specs reveal, I’m with you. It can’t follow MSFT’s price point when the Series X is clearly more powerful. PS5 Pro? Sure. $399 isn’t going to happen though, and right now I have to contemplate being Day 1 or take a long wait for the Pro, which we know damn well that’s dropping.
Last edited: