Trump: " we dissolved 60 years of prejudice and hatred with the elimination of one civil rights executive order"

Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
22,736
Reputation
8,471
Daps
96,349
Reppin
Chase U
Go ahead and tell us how great the Republicans have been to the black community then, buddy.

Dudes out here defending George W. Bush because Michelle Obama gave him a hug. Nasty work.
This is a false premise. That rhetorical trick won't work. Both are fundamentally anti-Black, which is why it is pointless to try to draw a comparison.

I never defended George W. Bush, so I don't know why you brought that up.
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
15,703
Reputation
4,503
Daps
43,394
This is a false premise. That rhetorical trick won't work. Both are fundamentally anti-Black, which is why it is pointless to try to draw a comparison.

I never defended George W. Bush, so I don't know why you brought that up.
It's absolutely not pointless to draw comparisons and contrasts between Presidential campaigns/administrations. That's how you track political evolution. Throwing it all in one undefined bucket of anti-blackness is doing a disservice to actual scholarship of anti-blackness because it not only destroys nuance and the ability to follow developments of the white supremacist movement, but it ends up diluting the actual harms perpetrated by specific administrations and actors by painting it all in one generalized brush. Nixon to Ford to Reagan and Bush I to Bush II to Trump were all anti-black in similar and different ways. Discussing that is only verboten to midwits.
 

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
14,048
Reputation
10,393
Daps
72,895
Reppin
Wakanda
It's absolutely not pointless to draw comparisons and contrasts between Presidential campaigns/administrations. That's how you track political evolution. Throwing it all in one undefined bucket of anti-blackness is doing a disservice to actual scholarship of anti-blackness because it not only destroys nuance and the ability to follow developments of the white supremacist movement, but it ends up diluting the actual harms perpetrated by specific administrations and actors by painting it all in one generalized brush. Nixon to Ford to Reagan and Bush I to Bush II to Trump were all anti-black in similar and different ways. Discussing that is only verboten to midwits.
I marvel at your ability to state such insane bullshït with so much confidence.
 

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
14,048
Reputation
10,393
Daps
72,895
Reppin
Wakanda
But you were probably on here clapping with tears in your eyes when Trump survived that assassination attempt "for the good of the nation", huh?
You're probably satisfied with that weak job Merrick the Meek and Biden's DOJ did against Trump because they played within the rules, huh?
You're the one voter Kamala was targeting with her outreach to the Cheneys, huh?
This you?











I don't think you're arguing in good faith.
8Ce2Afj.png
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
22,736
Reputation
8,471
Daps
96,349
Reppin
Chase U
It's absolutely not pointless to draw comparisons and contrasts between Presidential campaigns/administrations. That's how you track political evolution. Throwing it all in one undefined bucket of anti-blackness is doing a disservice to actual scholarship of anti-blackness because it not only destroys nuance and the ability to follow developments of the white supremacist movement, but it ends up diluting the actual harms perpetrated by specific administrations and actors by painting it all in one generalized brush. Nixon to Ford to Reagan and Bush I to Bush II to Trump were all anti-black in similar and different ways. Discussing that is only verboten to midwits.
It's not about throwing it all into one undefined bucket but about recognizing that comparing racists doesn't absolve any of them. If anything, you're giving cover to someone like Trump by trying to play the "relative" game when his "support" didn't translate into anything meaningful for Black people. You're just trying to weasel your way out of that stupid ass statement by vomiting out some pseudo-intellectual bullshyt. Sure, nuance has its place, but accountability and clarity should remain the priority. And under that light, you're...
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
15,703
Reputation
4,503
Daps
43,394
It's not about throwing it all into one undefined bucket but about recognizing that comparing racists doesn't absolve any of them. If anything, you're giving cover to someone like Trump by trying to play the "relative" game when his "support" didn't translate into anything meaningful for Black people. You're just trying to weasel your way out of that stupid ass statement by vomiting out some pseudo-intellectual bullshyt. Sure, nuance has its place, but accountability and clarity should remain the priority. And under that light, you're...
Who here claimed that comparing racists absolves any of them? Just because Trump didn't run as anti-black a campaign in 2016 as Ronald Reagan ran in 1980 or 1984 does not mean Trump is absolved from his own actions and anti-blackness.You seem to be arguing with a completely invented strawman and it's very tiresome to continuously face these idiotic posts about statements I've never made or positions I've never taken.

Again, only a midwit would believe that engaging in compare/contrast exercises between two bad options means that you're de facto absolving the least worst option. If I ask you who the worst President of the 20th century was, your answer doesn't mean you absolve the second worst from their legacy. That's just like...basic rational thinking.

The post you're quoting is from before Trump was even inaugurated in 2017, and was about what political demographics his campaign was targeting and what coalition he was trying to build, which was different from the traditional Republican coalition and resulted in him just winning the highest share of the black vote of any Republican in modern history. So your point about Trump's "support" not eventually translating into anything meaningful is irrelevant to that specific post. But if you want to bury your head in and sand and dismiss attempts to assess the shifting political landscape as"pseudo-intellectual bullshyt" then we're probably wasting our time going back and forth because we have very different approaches to engaging with politics.
 

JamesJabdi

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,061
Reputation
1,120
Daps
23,821
nah some of em are in here playin pretend like @JamesJabdi

Shut your bytch ass up. Its been fukk Biden, fukk Trump and fukk the corrupt American system since day 1 i got here.....weirdo political dikkryders like you confuse being critical of one president with supporting another because you are most likely stupid..now i am pretend :mjlol: ..stay mad fakkit :umad:
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
15,703
Reputation
4,503
Daps
43,394
It's absolutely not pointless to draw comparisons and contrasts between Presidential campaigns/administrations. That's how you track political evolution. Throwing it all in one undefined bucket of anti-blackness is doing a disservice to actual scholarship of anti-blackness because it not only destroys nuance and the ability to follow developments of the white supremacist movement, but it ends up diluting the actual harms perpetrated by specific administrations and actors by painting it all in one generalized brush. Nixon to Ford to Reagan and Bush I to Bush II to Trump were all anti-black in similar and different ways. Discussing that is only verboten to midwits.
I marvel at your ability to state such insane bullshït with so much confidence.
Yes, by now it is plainly obvious that you are impervious to critical thought. Thanks for playing. Now take your seat.
 
Top