Peruvian Connect
All Star
Why not?But you can't consider yourself pro black if you support things that will disproportionately impact black people.
Why not?But you can't consider yourself pro black if you support things that will disproportionately impact black people.
Why not?
Why not?
Fam, please, stop. This is the oldest trick in the book. Even the provision that the HUD can still approve or disapprove regardless of the findings.
Again, the 3 to 5 year timeline coincidentally falls on primary and election years when people won't care, also far after his presidency is over.
Most of ya'll didn't know this existed...as proof. Also, the head of HUD is chosen by the president . You think Republican majors and governors dikkriding Trump would have gotten their funding striped?
Trump is a extreme small government president, I doubt HUD funding is shyt, anyway. Again, Ben Carson is the Head of HUD.
Oh, goodness!
To play up to his dumbass base, which is why I'm surprised ya'll falling for it.
You think you've made a point but you haven't just a bunch of empty smart dumb nikka babble.
The bolded alone proves it.
Not at all. Are you implying that in order to be pro black you must support all things blacks? It's wrong for affluent blacks to criticize low income blacks, but it's okay for low income blacks to criticize the affluent blacks ?You are literally supporting the legacy of structural racism and black disenfranchisement by supporting this
c00ns and cac agents just can't help themselves. They coming out of the woodworks
It's obvious you on that MAGA wave of I got mines therefore fukk the rest of the black people who are still struggling. Otherwise you would've cared enough to take even 5 minutes to understand how the law works instead of sounding like some cac who couldn't give a damn either way how this affects the black community. Documenting the data with the tools provided by HUD was the first step. THEN you come up with the measures to address the issues at hand. How else are you going to fix the problem? You don't just cut a random check to end racial disparity and segregation. You document the specific issues then come up with the measures to address them specifically.The rule says towns and cities receiving HUD funds must document...just document...racial data. Not acting inject the communities with anythign to prevent segargation. Just document it.
It has to be reported every three to five years. That means the very first report would have came in 2018 (primary year) or 2020 (election year). And if they data is fukked up...HUD still has the power to approve or dissapprove funding.
This is what ya'll want everyone to be outraged about?
This was 2015.
Does that sound like "Not acting inject the communities with anythign to prevent segargation. Just document it." to you? Those were just a handful of cities. Other cities across america would've been forced to do the same type of work to help start to turn shyt around economically for black folks. But we know you MAGA and don't really care. It's a useless law anywayFrom New Orleans to Seattle to my hometown of St. Louis. In every location, local leaders and housing experts reported that the data and assessment tools helped them better understand and plan for the needs and well-being of their residents. In St. Louis, this was about better understanding the racial disparities that exist between zip codes and the regulatory barriers landlords in higher opportunity neighborhoods faced when attempting to offer fair housing to lower income tenants. In Seattle, it was about recognizing the dearth of career-track jobs in several poor neighborhoods of color, which helped local leaders plan for a new food distribution hub and job incubator in those areas. In New Orleans, it was about making the link between public transit and employment—when local officials realized that bus schedules were out of sync with the shift schedules for two of the city’s largest industries (hospitality and healthcare), they realigned transit options to meet the needs of these workers.
For such a meaningless law it's amazing that it was one of the first things Trump administration has been trying to dismantle piece by piece just like ACA. From January of 2017 and later again in May of that year, and in 2018 (oh let me guess he was just trying to drum up his base in the first and second year of his term so he could get re-elected right? )Everyone keeps posting how this law (originally signed in 1968 and amended in 2015 and 2020) was so important to black homeownership between now and then
And our rate continuously went down.
This is some emotional non sense. Can you provide proof of this?Same nikkas praising trump in here are the same nikkas that will quickly run to these boards and make a thread about their neighbor Karen calling the cops on them for standing in their own driveway.
Keep the suburbs white - Donald Trump
Both sides are still the same though, right?
Both sides are the same nikkas please chime in
What illegal immigrant you want to trade places with?But when Democrats chime in Gentrification and give more opportunity to illegal immigrants, What's the answer? "At least it's not Trump" ?
WHAT TRUMP IS DOING IS shyt , but this doesn't automatically give the dems a pass. We gotta stop settling.
It's got to be stressful to be triggered by the most retarded president ever.
He doesn't deserve all that blood boiling in our bodies.