Trump is Fukkin Wit Trans Day and Everybody Celebrating

[parallax]

First they came for one group, I didn't say anything, etc.

People are hopelessly lost.

but they consistently come for our group and were met with crickets.

 

[The G.O.D II]

I take this as “it’s only a few cases so whatevs” and that’s not a good look for u
youre all exposing yourselves I feel sorry for your mother

You falling for scare tactics exposes you. There are much more terrifying problems in this country then some fakkit reading to your illiterate child at a library

 

[cheek100]

You falling for scare tactics exposes you. There are much more terrifying problems in this country then some fakkit reading to your illiterate child at a library

I’m not scared tho. It sounds like your priorities are skewed.
I can tell u are onboard to let your kids ”change identities“ and that is your choice but I’m not ok with it. U won’t make me feel bad for it either.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

It's sad how susceptible most of this country is to misleading right-wing narratives.

The claim that minors are being "mutilated" by doctors and "big pharma" is a misleading and inflammatory misrepresentation of gender-affirming care. This care is grounded in well-established medical practices designed to support young people experiencing gender dysphoria. For younger children, gender-affirming care typically involves non-medical steps like social transition, which means using different names, pronouns, or clothing that aligns with their gender identity.

Medical interventions, such as puberty blockers, are only considered for adolescents (on the mid-higher age range) experiencing significant distress. These treatments are reversible and give young people and their families time to explore their identity without making permanent changes. Contrary to the nasty rhetoric, surgeries on minors are extremely, extremely rare and only performed in exceptional cases with extensive evaluation and consent.

Major medical organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Endocrine Society, endorse gender-affirming care because it has been shown to significantly improve mental health outcomes for transgender youth, reducing rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. The narrative that doctors and pharmaceutical companies are driven by profit to "mutilate" children grossly mischaracterizes their role. Healthcare providers follow rigorous guidelines to ensure care is safe and beneficial, with the primary goal of alleviating suffering and improving quality of life.

Using inflammatory language like "mutilation" spreads fear and stigma, making it harder for transgender youth and their families to access the care they need. This rhetoric distracts from the real issue: supporting young people in distress and helping them live authentically and healthily. Rather than sensationalizing, discussions about gender-affirming care should focus on evidence, compassion, and the lived experiences of those it seeks to help.

There are no positives in this. Trump's policies targeting gender-affirming care will lead to increased suffering for trans youth, stripping them of medically supported treatments proven to reduce depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. Denying this care ignores the consensus of major medical organizations and undermines their well-being, leaving them more vulnerable to mental health crises.

AAP reaffirms gender-affirming care policy, authorizes systematic review of evidence to guide update.
US paediatric leaders back gender affirming approach while also ordering evidence review.
AAP Policy Statement Urges Support and Care of Transgender and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents.
Pubertal Suppression for Transgender Youth and Risk of Suicidal Ideation.
Ensuring Comprehensive Care and Support for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Children and Adolescents.


Did you know that there is an actual epidemic with parents forcing irreversible surgeries on intersex children at birth?

Amid transgender care bans, exceptions made for surgery on intersex children

Despite many gender-affirming care bans for trans youth across the U.S., controversial surgeries for intersex children to assign them a gender are often still allowed.

abcnews.go.com

Though conservative legislators across the country have introduced or passed bans that limit access to gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth, the bills have explicitly allowed an exception for surgery on intersex minors.

This means surgeries can be performed on babies or young children, but only if they have a medically verifiable condition that doesn't fit into the typical definitions of "male" or "female."

Surgeries on intersex children have been condemned by the United Nations, the Human Rights Campaign and intersex activists around the world. However, in the U.S., the federal government has left it up to individual states to create their own laws on gender-affirming care.

Some doctors have defended these surgeries as being an option that should be made available to children and patients. But many intersex patients and advocates say these procedures are medically risky.

As anti-transgender legislation has swept the country -- with lawmakers in many states preventing minors from undergoing gender-affirming care -- carve-outs have been allowed for surgeries on intersex children to continue.

Dr. Arlene Baratz, a Pennsylvania-based physician and medical and research coordinator for InterConnect Support Group for intersex people, said she finds the exception "interesting" considering that most transgender children do not undergo surgery until they are in their late teens and don't undergo genital surgery until they are age 18 or older.

They also are often required to undergo a psychological evaluation and have to live in the gender they identify with before surgery can be performed.

"The opposite is actually true for intersex children, and they [often] undergo surgery when they're infants. Again, they're not old enough to speak, some of them aren't old enough to walk," Baratz, the mother of two intersex children, told ABC News. "They know nothing about themselves, we know nothing about them, who they are, what they will like, how they are experiencing their gender."

She continued, "And so, I think that in order not to make mistakes with this kind of surgery, it should be available to people who want it and it should be available to people who can understand the consequences of it and that it should wait until they're old enough to be able to decide for themselves."

Why does this not receive the same "concern"?

 

[ReturnOfJudah]

TLC about to lose 80 percent of their shows

 

[Uachet]

evil ideology that literally thousands of years old across multiple cultures that span the globe. these people ain't new.

they gonna exist long after humanity becomes multi-planetary. so whats the end goal here?

Pushing the ideology on to children is what is evil. You know this, but yet you choose to avoid that argument. No one gives a damn about what adults and their supporters are doing (I assume you are one, or support them). They can choose to claim whatever they want, their right to do that should not infringe on the rights of females and decisions that have irreversible consequences should not be made by children.

So yes, if the ideology is pushing drugs and a desire to mutilate children in its name, then it is EVIL.

 

[bnew]

Pushing the ideology on to children is what is evil. You know this, but yet you choose to avoid that argument. No one gives a damn about what adults and their supporters are doing (I assume you are one, or support them). They can choose to claim whatever they want, their right to do that should not infringe on the rights of females and decisions that have irreversible consequences should not be made by children.

So yes, if the ideology is pushing drugs and a desire to mutilate children in its name, then it is EVIL.

what is the ideology as you understand it and how is it pushed to children?

 

[Uachet]

but they consistently come for our group and were met with crickets.

They keep parroting that statement, while also not seeming to understand that Black Americans are always the first group they come for. Yet, I wonder if they make that statement to all of the other groups that sit back and remain quiet while our people are getting that work? It is almost like most of them using that statement are not Black American or they are desperately trying to make sure we Black Americans continue to defend them without them having to reciprocate that defense.

To all of those who keep using that statement. If you want Black Americans to care about your issues, how about you show some concern about ours in return. This piggy backing on our fights is nothing but parasitic behavior on your part.

 

[Uachet]

what is the ideology as you understand it and how is it pushed to children?

Read the post you originally posted. If they are pushing gender affirming care, puberty blockers (which stunt a child's development), and even surgeries which are allowed in some states at the age of 15, then it is evil. I put up a link that shows all of this, but again you are avoiding that argument.

So please, explain to me why do you think children who can't drink, can't smoke, can't go to war, can't sign contracts, etc should be-able to choose to change their genders and take puberty blockers or request surgery before the age of 18? Remember again, I showed you a source that has the information in it on this issue that those like you try to claim is not happening in the US. So explain why you support that in a manner that makes sense.

 

[The G.O.D II]

I’m not scared tho. It sounds like your priorities are skewed.
I can tell u are onboard to let your kids ”change identities“ and that is your choice but I’m not ok with it. U won’t make me feel bad for it either.

What are you even talking about you mouth breather? Me not caring about some minuscule issue that affects 1% of the population equal me letting my kids transition. It’s idiots like you that made Trump president

 

[boogers]

So you pro tranny/batty lyfe AND I seen you on here talking about you've used IV drugs before....

You think black people fukk with nikkas like you? Buddy you was on IV drugs

fukk you posting Camron/Dame for? You know they ain't with that fukk shyt right?

We don't fukk with no Decepticons...the Devil brings deception and confusion but our eyes are wide open

If ya eyes was ever open you wouldn't have been on IV drugs......

Back of the line maffuka!

cheers for the opinion

got a nice spot for ya on the ignore list

 

[cheek100]

What are you even talking about you mouth breather? Me not caring about some minuscule issue that affects 1% of the population equal me letting my kids transition. It’s idiots like you that made Trump president

what is a mouth breather? I can’t breathe now?
why are u ghey

 

[BunchePark]

cheers for the opinion

got a nice spot for ya on the ignore list

You better ignore me before I trigger yo ass and you be back on that glass dikk

 

[GMoney]

Do you think it's all a coincidence that GOP kingmakers Thiel, Musk and Sacks are front and center to this? These [immigrant] Apartheid successors have already started concocting up a white supremacy cocktail, that'll go all too well with a country who're already inebriated at their own party of disillusionment of how they can't see the shade of white anymore.

Style points for the above, but you're just crashing out poetically now. Those immigrants might as well be DNC kingmakers because Space X and Palantair were still getting those government contracts under a Harris administration. Musk/Sacks would be just as dangerous amplifying a Gingrich revolution or Tea Party-style backlash to a Harris presidency. She offered no pushback to them.

You're driven by the emotion of the issue, and that's what Conservatives play off. It's the very reason why y'all don't know how to have a genuine, nuanced discourse about it purely for the fact you're repulsed by the thought of it.

You want a genuine, nuanced discourse? Go talk to radical feminists, lesbians, and other 'gender critical' women who've been discussing this long before Trump ever stepped foot in the White House.

 

[Surreal]

Didn't vote for Trump but didn't vote for any Trans laws, so....