the cac mamba
Veteran
i fukking hate the far leftNJ hospitals ask parents to ‘identify’ pronouns and sexual orientations of newborn babies

we're now doing pronouns in bio.....for newborn fukking babies

i fukking hate the far leftNJ hospitals ask parents to ‘identify’ pronouns and sexual orientations of newborn babies
You're arguing that Republicans have a winning strategy because they've successfully tied trans issues to Democrats, forcing them to defend an "unpopular" stance, but that framing ignores how the GOP itself manufactured this outrage in the first place. The GOP has a long history of picking marginalized groups to demonize, to rally their base. That doesn't mean Democrats should just abandon them.That may be. But like it has been said multiple times in this thead, it's a winning strategy. Republicans bring it up so much to force democrats to defend an unpopular issue. They have successfully tied transgenders to Democrat party. Republicans take the moral high ground of not letting biological men dominate women in sports, and allow children to make life changing decisions to change their gender. All people with common sense are against those things. 67% of Democrat voters are against them.
So if a Republican brings up the subject, and a Democrat politician ignores it, then the Democrat is painted as being in favor of it by default. If Democrats do what they been doing and just shout "Trans women are women too" Republicans just sit back and smile, knowing they have the winning hand.
So Republicans will play that hand as long as the issue remains unpopular with the majority of voters.
I was raised in a small town growing up. Whenever I go back and hear black people talking politics, the first thing brought up about Democrats is how they defend gays and trannys. If that has become the most identifiable thing about the party to the average voter, then that is a serious flaw.
You haven’t answered why trans issues are legitimate and worthy of Democrat defense.You're arguing that Republicans have a winning strategy because they've successfully tied trans issues to Democrats, forcing them to defend an "unpopular" stance, but that framing ignores how the GOP itself manufactured this outrage in the first place. The GOP has a long history of picking marginalized groups to demonize, to rally their base. That doesn't mean Democrats should just abandon them.
You also claim that if Democrats ignore the issue, they're painted as supporting it, which is just an admission that Republicans are setting the terms of the debate. By that logic, if the GOP starts fear-mongering about something else, whether it's vaccines or books in schools, Democrats should just cave there too? That's just cowardice.
The idea that defending trans people is the "most identifiable" thing about Democrats is just parroting Republican messaging. Democrats are also the party fighting for healthcare, workers rights, infrastructure, and student debt relief. But if Republicans hammer the culture war hard enough that even Black voters in small towns start repeating their talking points, that is a problem with messaging, not policy.
And what "moral high ground" are Republicans taking? Their arguments are built on fear-mongering and outright lies. The "dominating women's sports" narrative is a distortion of a tiny number of cases blown out of proportion, and the "children making life-changing decisions" argument ignores the reality that medical decisions around gender-affirming care are made carefully with parental and medical guidance over a long period of time. It's not some free-for-all like they pretend. And even then no surgeries are performed on children.
As far as the question in that NYT/IPSOS poll, it is framed in a way that pushes people responding toward a negative response. Pollsters looking for the "right" answer often craft questions like this to get the answers they want, and in this case, the question is loaded with biased language designed to lead people there.
Your argument boils down to "Republicans have made trans rights unpopular, so Democrats should abandon them," but that's exactly the trap the GOP wants. Instead of conceding to bad-faith attacks, we should be trying to expose the manufactured outrage for what it is, unless you support the GOP position, then...
that's because he can'tYou haven’t answered why trans issues are legitimate and worthy of Democrat defense.
I already answered it. You just didn't like the answer, because you're not an honest actor, nor is that racist animal @the cac mamba.You haven’t answered why trans issues are legitimate and worthy of Democrat defense.
That Indian has no other response for democratic incompetence you see he's quiet as his magic carpet gliding thru the night in the Schumer threadsAnother tranny thread?![]()
Whole time he's a transracial indian….its self hate
12 threads created using the words "trans" or "transgender" in the title created by Nap since the turn of the year. Obsession.
The country that elected Donald Trump twice now cares about “bigotry” because of the trannies aren't hated enoughThe broader cultural war matters. Liberals have become toxic and have their own brands of bigotry now.
That sexist statement Doechii made for example will turn alot of men away from liberals and democrats by extension.
Is this a woman?I already answered it. You just didn't like the answer, because you're not an honest actor, nor is that racist animal @the cac mamba.
This is the correct answer. People fall for the okie doke and it’s pathetic.Classic projection. Republicans, including Trump, have spent years relentlessly pushing anti-trans rhetoric, making it a central issue in their campaigns, state legislatures, and media talking points. Now, after manufacturing a moral panic, he's pretending that it's Democrats or society at large obsessing over it. He's acting as if trans issues are dominating everything when, in reality, it's his party that keeps introducing anti-trans bills, banning healthcare, and making it a wedge issue. This is nothing but manufactured outrage. And people are falling for it. Worse yet, people who should know better are buying into it, because they share the same bigotries.
Do you think that’s a savvy political play in 2024 and beyond?
republicans aren't saying trannies "can't exist". they're saying they can't invade women's spaces, and push this filth on young children. they're drawing a line. the vast majority of people agree with that
democrats are out here pushing "puberty blockers" on school age childrenwhat the fukk is that?