OfTheCross
Veteran
... This has become the new normal.
What did she do, though?
Did she expose their off-record convo?
What he said?
Trump IMPEACHED by the US House; US Senate Trial Allows No New Witnesses & Acquits Trump
- Thread starter Arithmetic
- Start date
What did she do, though?
Did she expose their off-record convo?
What he said?
CurrencyChase
Banned
I'm glad I'm not wasting my time watching this BS. Thank yall for the patience. I don't want to start punching a wall.
Are these the words of someone who has the entire country's best interest at heart? This is truly some sad shyt.
Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Why would she tell him an interaction where he was cussing her out for valid interview questions was off the record?
They cant even lie good
OfTheCross
Veteran
these nikkas ain't defending shyt. obfuscation like a muthdafcka
That's it. They can't even defend him.
OfTheCross
Veteran
That's it. They can't even defend him.
that's part of it.
The other part is that they want to wrap this whole thing up before the SoTU on 02/04/20
OfTheCross
Veteran
But I honestly didn't hear a defense in the time that I listened...they spoke about Schiff more than they defended Trump
Nothing Trump does or says really surprises me anymore.
But what I find more depressing is that half the people in the country I live can look at that and say "
he's got my vote" .
OfTheCross
Veteran
The Republican Senators are saying that this was a great presentation full of facts not half-truths on C-Span
I hate them.
I hate them.
Formerly Black Trash
Philosopher, Connoisseur, Future Legend
Yeah shyt is done when they're lying that bad
OfTheCross
Veteran
Dem Senator with a GREAT strategy..
saying the Rep lawyers made a great case for having witnesses and documents in the trial
Since they're saying that the White House held the funds for concern of EU funding, bring in the witnesses that can testify to that. Because there was reporting that the White House was scrambling to come up with a justification for the hold on aid..
saying the Rep lawyers made a great case for having witnesses and documents in the trial
Since they're saying that the White House held the funds for concern of EU funding, bring in the witnesses that can testify to that. Because there was reporting that the White House was scrambling to come up with a justification for the hold on aid..
She gave details of what occurred after this interview ended.
Pompeo explodes at NPR reporter, asks if she could find Ukraine on a map
Json
Superstar
The senators Q and A section is going to be a s—tshow. Assuming the Republicans don’t ask all their questions and the Dems get to ask 47.
Who exactly can back up the president’s thinking?
If they believe the FBI withheld info to mischaracterize Trump, do they believe they all evidence should be made available?
Worthless Loser
Blackpilled
I'm convinced there will not be witnesses. The final vote on staying on office or removal will be embarrassing. Not only will it not even get 50 votes, I expect someone like Joe Manchin from West Virginia or Doug Jones from Alabama to vote for an acquittal. That would put you at 45 votes total in favor of removal.
I think there's going to be a big march in front of Capitol Hill either right after they vote for no witnesses, or right after the acquittal.
I think there's going to be a big march in front of Capitol Hill either right after they vote for no witnesses, or right after the acquittal.