Non troll response:
I know everybody is innocent until proven guilty, but got way too many arrows pointing at her. No way dude ran off with no money, and ain't no drug cartel i heard of is wacking people without making sure they got paid. I know what I'm talking bout cause I watch movies, and in the movies the first question people ask who benefitted the most.
Edit: I forgot to add her complete lack of remorse over his death or empathy to his family. She sounds like a throwed off preschool teacher when she talks about it. She literally laughs every time.
And this arrow-pointing only happens because the documentary makers don't actually follow through on a lot of things.
They dedicate a whole episode to Don's disappearance but they clearly build the narrative around the possibility of Carole murdering him. It's already been mentioned but they barely highlight the strange decisions on Don's life like burying gold and cash, or those little trips he takes to Costa Rica all the time. shyt, didn't they even mention flying undetected by radar at some point? No follow-up about any of these things though.
Hell, they have the one guy who claims Don told him a day before disappearing that he's planning something and if he can pull it off, he's a genius. The show touches upon these moments but doesn't investigate deeper, only focusing on the evidence that feeds the murder narrative.
Another good example is the restraining order Don was trying to get for Carole. Any real reporter would have followed up on that and try to get a deeper look into their relationship. But this doc doesn't investigate, it just interviews people and lets people with clear personal involvement (and personal stakes) create narratives the makers never bother to challenge critically.
My point being that this doc is so incredibly high on sensationalism and so little on actual investigative journalism that I wouldn't take anything presented here at face value.
. I thought they'd be at least 20k even for a under the counter deal.