This Woman has had sex with over 370 Men

[Rawtid]

What you have there is the chicken and the egg argument.

Do you women like those men because they are fukking a lot of women?

Or

Are those dudes fukking a lot of women because they have clearly desirable traits that women look for and there fore women pursue them, not even knowing their number of sexual partners?

It's obviously the latter, but the former is the copout for those unwilling to face the truth.

LMAO I changed the wording to avoid the "no homo" moment but it's clearly the latter. I want one of these dudes to walk up to a woman and say "Hey you know I've had sex with over 200 women" and see how she reacts. LMAO!! Please do a video.

 

[Turbulent]

"If a woman has slept with alot of men she's a hoe and I'd fukk but not wife"
"I'd only wife a woman that fukks and sucks like a porn star"

both statements are not mutually exclusive. Why do you act like the only way to learn how to "fukk and suck like a pornstar" is through experience with many men? is it impossible to teach your virgin girl to become a freak only for you? it's a beautiful thing cause she does exactly what i like and is my personal freak.

also, if a woman has had 8 partners in her life, that means she got fukked 8 different ways and was taught how to please 8 different men. Now if i wife her, i not only have to un-teach everything that was taught to her, then i also have to teach her what i like. That's why women can't handle multiple partners as well as men. it fukks them up mentally because you submit to different men who teach and un-teach and re-teach you different things going in all directions. if a dominant dude has fukked 8 chicks, chances are he fukked those 8 the same way because he doesn't submit to her when fukking her.

So yeah, to answer your question, ideally i'd like to wife a chick with a low number or a virgin who has an open mind and wants me to be happy in all aspects of my life and will put in work to help us get to that point (and if i got such a woman, i'll fulfill her needs as best as i can to keep her in my life as well.) Like i said, it would be a beautiful thing.

 

[PartyHeart]

Guess what you are in the minority, I don't know why that's so fukking hard for yall to understand just look around. The majority of women fukk men who fukk a lot of women. Why I don't know. But the majority of men would prefer a partner who didn't fukk a lot of dudes. Why is THAT hard to understand. ITS TRUE.

You will believe whatever you want, but I can definitively say I know more about women than you do. The only women who actively seek out men who have sex with a lot of women probably have just as many partners as him or are just looking for sex/money and don't take him seriously.

The women who y'all characterize as 'wife material' though DO care. A lot.

regardless, even if you want to define women getting sex from men as a "conquest", generally speaking, if both are conquests, men getting it from women is more of a conquest. if you disagree with that i think it's best that we just stop right here.

That's probably for the best. You clearly view sex as a zero sum game or some type of competition to begin with, so you'd never fully understand what I'm saying.

another thing i find funny is that this so called double standard is actually more women's fault than men's fault. Most of the time it's women complaining about other women being slut (because it devalues their p*ssy power). Same way men complain about simps because we think it devalues our power. But if women start giving it up more freely you'll see women get judged much less on this (as you can see, it's already happening now. as casual sex is becoming more trendy, promiscuous women are not shamed like back in the day). So if there is a so called double-standard, it's being sustained by women more than men imo.

Not even close.

Would you really be more attracted to a dude who has less experience than you than a dude who has more than you? Which one do you see yourself going longterm with (everything else being equal)?

The man with less partners. It would mean to me he has his own code that he stands by and he's not easily influenced by his peers, which is a signal of strength to me. It would also mean he's selective and less likely to define his masculinity by his sexuality, which means less likelihood to cheat in a long term relationship. More than likely he'll be better in bed too, less selfish than the guy sleeping with any and everybody so he can get props for himself.

You will call me a liar, but most women WITH SIMILAR STANDARDS FOR THEMSELVES would agree.

 

[Turbulent]

What you have there is the chicken and the egg argument.

Do you women like those men because they are fukking a lot of dudes?

Or

Are those dudes fukking a lot of women because they have clearly desirable traits that women look for and there fore women pursue them, not even knowing their number of sexual partners?

It's obviously the latter, but the former is the copout for those unwilling to face the truth.

how is it "clearly the latter" when women have been KNOWN to not pay a dude any mind or attention and one day they see him hanging out with desirable females and all of a sudden they pay him attention and flirt with him?

but yeah, it's clearly the latter...

 

[Turbulent]

You will believe whatever you want, but I can definitively say I know more about women than you do. The only women who actively seek out men who have sex with a lot of women probably have just as many partners as him or are just looking for sex/money and don't take him seriously.

The women who y'all characterize as 'wife material' though DO care. A lot.



That's probably for the best. You clearly view sex as a zero sum game or some type of competition to begin with, so you'd never fully understand what I'm saying.



Not even close.



The man with less partners. It would mean to me he has his own code that he stands by and he's not easily influenced by his peers, which is a signal of strength to me. It would also mean he's selective and less likely to define his masculinity by his sexuality, which means less likelihood to cheat in a long term relationship. More than likely he'll be better in bed too, less selfish than the guy sleeping with any and everybody so he can get props for himself.

You will call me a liar, but most women WITH SIMILAR STANDARDS FOR THEMSELVES would agree.

why do you assume i would call you a liar?

 

[PartyHeart]

What you have there is the chicken and the egg argument.

Do you women like those men because they are fukking a lot of dudes?

Or

Are those dudes fukking a lot of women because they have clearly desirable traits that women look for and there fore women pursue them, not even knowing their number of sexual partners?

It's obviously the latter, but the former is the copout for those unwilling to face the truth.

Its definitely the latter. Women are not going around saying omg he's had sex with a lot of girls, husband material :inlove:

 

[BelowTheMasonDixon]

What you have there is the chicken and the egg argument.

Do you women like those men because they are fukking a lot of dudes?

Or

Are those dudes fukking a lot of women because they have clearly desirable traits that women look for and there fore women pursue them, not even knowing their number of sexual partners?

It's obviously the latter, but the former is the copout for those unwilling to face the truth.

LMMFAO. I ain't one of these rookie nikkas. I ain't an all star either, but I'm damn sure starting in this league on a playoff squad, so miss me with that bullshyt. Most women are so basic, that if you fukk one of their "Friends"(because women don't really have friends") its a 75% you gonna fukk HER, friend (A), friend (B) and friend (C). And it's not because you are the most attractive, most successful, most articulate or other bullshyt these silver tongue brawds in here want you to believe.

the answer is much simpler.

Women want to fukk men who fukk other women.


If you fukk one chick you can DRAIN her circle. because women are so competitive with other women and so stupid( stupid is a bad word, so lets say...crazy)

that they wanna fukk whoever someone else fukked. like lemmings or some shyt.

but yall keep listening to Pie R Squared ass nikkas and these uber cool down to earth chicks(who make up like 2% of the available female dating pool)

That if

 

[Rawtid]

how is it "clearly the latter" when women have been KNOWN to not pay a dude any mind or attention and one day they see him hanging out with desirable females and all of a sudden they pay him attention and flirt with him?

but yeah, it's clearly the latter...

Because (some) women feel they are better (looking) than the "desirable female" he was kicking it with so they go for it. They aren't worried about if he's fukking them or not. All they are saying is "If she can pull him, then for sure I can pull him". Let the competition begin.

 

[Turbulent]

Because (some) women feel they are better (looking) than the "desirable female" he was kicking it with so they go for it. They aren't worried about if he's fukking them or not. All they are saying is "If she can pull him, then for sure I can pull him". Let the competition begin.

but that's my point. if it's a competition than the dude becomes the prize. So being with many women will often time (not for all women but for a lot of women) make them view you as a prize and as more desirable. so it's the first and not the latter (referring to what DaChampishere said)

 

[PartyHeart]

why do you assume i would call you a liar?

Based on our conversation thus far you obviously think women and men view sex from entirely opposite ends of the spectrum. So in your mind, guy who has sex with a lot of girls = desirable, girl who has sex with no guy but you (your own words) = desirable.

Its not true, but I guess it does help you to think this way so you can have sex with as many people as possible but still feel equally yoked with a woman with little to no experience. Like I said you can believe whatever you want, but good luck when you are ready to "wife" one of those women, because you'll find they don't like a man with no discretion any more than I'm telling you I do.

 

[No_bammer_weed]

Thats not the point. Most guys don't really care if a girl have been with many partners, hell most guys will sleep with them regardless of that fact. It only becomes an issue when a guy is considering the woman for something more serious.

Deep down we love them hoes. We don't wanna be with them though.

Naw, i agree with this because this is reasonable, i wouldnt wife....im talking about the cats that are acting like a permiscuous woman is the worst concept imaginable that this world has to offer, acting all dramatic like "i couldnt be in the same room as her, and shake her hand"...

 

[Reckless]

Why ate y'all arguing about a double standard that has been around since the beginning of time?? If you're a woman who fukks mad dudes, you're a hoe. And a guy who funks mad girls is that nicca. It ain't changing. It's just as dumb when guys whine about it not being acceptable to hit females.

 

[DaChampIsHere]

one day they see him hanging out with desirable females

That just makes note that he has desirable traits. You said nothing about his numbers in that whole post friend, nor would you be able to tell anyone's numbers from looking at him.

The only thing you proved with that post is that you go around making guestimates about random men's slangin' game.

Women want to fukk men who fukk other women.

How do you know someone is fukking just based on looking at them together. Again, are you going around looking at men, sizing them up, and guessing what their bedroom game is?

Also, When's the last time you ever got at a chick that no other man wanted (A.K.A. an ugly chick)? I'll wait.

 

[Turbulent]

Based on our conversation thus far you obviously think women and men view sex from entirely opposite ends of the spectrum. So in your mind, guy who has sex with a lot of girls = desirable, girl who has sex with no guy but you (your own words) = desirable.

Its not true, but I guess it does help you to think this way so you can have sex with as many people as possible but still feel equally yoked with a woman with little to no experience. Like I said you can believe whatever you want, but good luck when you are ready to "wife" one of those women, because you'll find they don't like a man with no discretion any more than I'm telling you I do.

lol, everything you just said has nothing to do with what i asked you. Earlier i asked you a question about what you would prefer. you answered. you could have left it at that but tried to "read my mind" instead and assume i wouldn't believe you were honest. I'm only talking on what i've seen and experiences. I even said many times i'm talking in general (which means there obviously are exceptions). You like to assume what i'm thinking and what i believe and then accuse me of assuming what every woman wants. projection?

 

[Taadow]

YEESH @ this last page...y'all saying everything but the right thing:

Women don't necessarily want a man "who has sex with a lot of women" - but they do want a man that is a good fucc...and a lot of times, the best way to guess if he is a good fucc is if he's had sex with a lot of women (or can keep a woman).