I said the EXACT same thing and dude skated over it.
Religion/Spirituality Theism Discussion (Abrahamic Religions, Religious Philosophy, etc.)
- Thread starter Hip-Hop-Bulls
- Start date
-
- Tags
- christianity islam
So you dismiss it rather than find out? My point still stands.
I didn't skate over. I acknowledged it but didn't pursue it further. It still goes into my whole circular narrative, however.
And this is the fundamental difference between me and you. The pathology is always important. The irony being that you love to quote philosophy, you should know this
Pathology is important TO YOU...
Not me.
if we're talkign about learning something, it doesn't matter if you knew it 20 years ago or yesterday.
you sure?
You can't know...what you don't know.
It technically doesn't
Bruh.
Stop talking about how much we know if you really don't know how much we know.
All we can say is that we don't know everything but theres no way to say where we are in terms of knowing everything.
Pathology is important TO YOU...
Not me.
if we're talkign about learning something, it doesn't matter if you knew it 20 years ago or yesterday.
you sure?
You can't know...what you don't know. It technically doesn't
Bruh.
Stop talking about how much we know if you really don't know how much we know.
All we can say is that we don't know everything but theres no way to say where we are in terms of knowing everything.
Napoleon you are quite dense. There isn't a scientist on Earth who would say pathology does not matter. Pathology is often times how we identify differences and gain clarity on relative truths. The pathology matters because even though two people may come within striking distance of each other with any given measure, there will be differences. I may have the same grasp on English as you but if a Linguist studied us and our uses of it, they would be able to identify underlying differences that are important in any respective field. Nuance, my friend.
A person with less resources reaching similar ability than someone who had significantly more resources is more impressive. Of course, that is my opinion and you are more than welcome to be the robotic, slave that you are.
There isn't a "we." Slaves don't get to practice their agency
DerrtySouthpaw
Gawdisbyke
ok you can shut the fukk up now thats pretty much my point dumb nikka
I love how people say "ooo that's just a theory"
it's a fact supported by evidence, the universe's expansion is accelerating. how or why it is, is the unproven "theory"
How would you go about validating this? What is space expanding into? Is it self evident?
the space itself is expanding, there's no way to know what our universe is expanding into. or even if there is anything to expand into.
LOL. Nice try
I agree with majority of what you're saying but you aren't arguing what others in this thread are saying. Accuracy and progressing as a race is not what people in this thread are arguing. They are talking about absolute truth and reality, which short of omniscience, is pointless to discuss.
Philosophy isn't truth, nor could any human being be capable of thinking about absolute truth
Wrong. no one is arguing for this. Absolute truth is not a thing that actually exists. You EXPECT some sort of absolute truth, and since science can't give that to you, you see that as some sort of failure. I'm sorry, but that's not a reasonable path to truth. You think that if something isn't absolute the it's wrong...... that's just not the case.
You're pretty much wrong with this whole post.
There is no way of knowing if absolute truth exist.
I don't expect anything. Science isn't a failure because it has utility for me and mankind. It's irrelevant concerning the quest for omniscience.
Truth is not a word I entertain.
I don't think think because something isn't absolute, it is wrong, but I do put it context and understand there may be contradictions or things ahead that may make whatever it is no longer hold validity.
Wait. I thought your entire perspective was one from the idea that there is an objective truth... and that human minds have only a small understanding of that truth.... no?
We can't know that but the possibility must be entertained. If push came to shove I'd say there is a such thing as omniscience.