Islam doesn't recognize Jesus as God.
Instant disqualifier.
Religion/Spirituality Theism Discussion (Abrahamic Religions, Religious Philosophy, etc.)
- Thread starter Hip-Hop-Bulls
- Start date
-
- Tags
- christianity islam
Instant disqualifier.
I don't think you understand this.
There are NO FACTS in science.
There are things held to be so centrally unshakable that they can be considered "objective facts" but they are rather well established theories.
Keep proclaiming shyt that isn't true and then act like you were right all along, brehs
Once a theory is established it gets accepted in the science community as a "fact", "rule" or "Law".
Examples...
Laws of classical mechanics
Laws of gravitation and relativity
Laws of Physics
These laws are irrefutable theories accepted by all scientific communities.
Unless evolution or big bang can be accepted by all recognizable scientific bodies, it will forever remain a theory!!!!!
only because its pretty much "confirmed" to an unmovable degree.
They're empirically theories determined through experimentation and hypotheses.
Which are realms of knowledge, not knowledge themselves.
...not really. Classical mechanics breaks down at high speeds or small scales...
its accepted by all recognizable scientific bodies. Its in the REALM of biology and chemistry.
Evolution is an accepted fact. Things change.
The explanation of that change is through the theory of natural selection and genetic mutation.
says the fukk nikka who trolled the hell out of the thread to show off the fact that he indirectly grasped the problem of induction and wouldn't let go until everyone acknowledged it.
Watch your mouth
And once again, you redirect the argument with ad hominem
You need to learn how to refute what is before you and not create false arguments that you yourself created and then respond with copious amounts of word salads.Someone who is self-taught is more admirable than someone who has the same knowledge but none of it is by their own pathology. Know that.
Er, no. Theories never become laws. Do a bit of learning and improve your arguments.
http://www.notjustatheory.com/
Dumb. Unless you can prove YOUR omnipotence, you can't say for sure what humanity will or will not ever know.
But again, this is all irrelevant. No one says we can have absolute knowledge. But as far as what we know... we know what we know. You seem to be taking the stance that if we don't have absolute knowledge about everything, we don't know anything.... that's simply not true.
Watch your mouth
And once again, you redirect the argument with ad hominem
Quit bytching because you can't present your arguments as eloquently as me.
Wouldn't matter.
if you know the same things, it doesn't matter how you came to know it.
And use use a website which has a gmail account for contact as your source?
"notjustatheory@gmail.com"
if you know the same things, it doesn't matter how you came to know it.
And this is the fundamental difference between me and you. The pathology is always important. The irony being that you love to quote philosophy, you should know this
Alright, I can't prove that we will never be omniscient, but I can thoroughly say that we are not there in our current position. My point still holds. Yes, I am of the position that we don't know anything in absolute terms, no I am not of the position that we do not know anything in relative terms. Our truth is microscopic.