xoxodede
Superstar
I've presented scholarship on this subject multiple times in other threads, but just so we're clear, the bulk of the 'evidence' on what you're presented thus far stems from here......
....and has been refuted multiple times, beginning in 1921 and, most recently, here.....
ALL the 'evidence' Farrakhan and your 'scholars' have used stems from the first book which was a proven hoax concocted by the Russian Secret Police in 1895.
Here are the sources referenced in the Secret Relationship of Jews and Blacks:
You posting two White propaganda books have NOTHING to do with the NOI book. Why? Because he only uses JEWISH sources and scholars. Their OWN words.
Besides The Protocols of the Elders of Zion - Wikipedia -- does not talk about The Hamitic Myth/Curse -- nor do they talk about the enslavement of Black people.
See, you're confused.
Both The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and The Lie That Wouldn't Die: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are about so-called 'Jewish Conspiracy' to gain domination of the whole world -- not about anything about what's sourced in The Secret Relationship of Jews and Blacks.
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was only brought up to defend a "modified ‘Hamitic Hypothesis'" -- not the original Hamitic Hypothesis created by the Jews and the Babylonian Talmud.
Here's one of your beloved Jewish scholars explaining and later in the piece -- reaching- like they always do to make a connection to make them look like the victim of hate speech: ‘
Invaders who have stolen the country’: The Hamitic Hypothesis, Race and the Rwandan Genocide
The use in genocidal propaganda of a modified ‘Hamitic Hypothesis' (the assertion that African ‘civilisation' was due to racially distinct Caucasoid invaders from the north/north-east of Africa) has become a key feature of commentary on the 1994 Rwandan genocide. In order to historicise the Hypothesis, the article first traces the transformation by European anthropology of the ‘Hamite' in to a racial object and how the extraneous provenance of ‘the Tutsi' was articulated in colonial Rwanda. The article then critically assesses the centrality of the Hypothesis in constructing the Tutsi population as a target of genocide. Finally, the article explores both the inadvertent and explicit ways in which contemporary commentary reiterates aspects of the ‘Hamitic assemblage'.
This is where they try to tie the two together....
It seems probable that this conspiratorial idiom was inspired by the Protocole des Sages de Sion, which claimed there was a global Jewish conspiracy (see Cohn, 1980).Bwejeri does not simply draw a (legitimate) analogy between the suffering of Jews and Tutsis, but makes the Tutsi into Jews (with the associated dangers noted above) while simultaneously, if inadvertently, substantiating the claims of a conspiratorial device inspired by Anti-Semitism.
Source: (PDF) ‘Invaders who have stolen the country’: The Hamitic Hypothesis, Race and the Rwandan Genocide
Last edited: