Tony Martin is an Afrocentrist whose 'reserach' is biased and ahistorical, based more on conjecture and innuendo rather than facts, and is a Holocaust denier.
Try harder.
You say you’re Black?
The Zionist Jews and Jewish Community Attack on Tamika Mallory is Disgusting
- Thread starter xoxodede
- Start date
You say you’re Black?
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,280
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
xoxodede said:You wish
What actual scholarship have you presented? What scholarship have you proven to be false?
I've presented scholarship on this subject multiple times in other threads, but just so we're clear, the bulk of the 'evidence' on what you're presented thus far stems from here......
....and has been refuted multiple times, beginning in 1921 and, most recently, here.....
ALL the 'evidence' Farrakhan and your 'scholars' have used stems from the first book which was a proven hoax concocted by the Russian Secret Police in 1895.
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 45,063
- Reputation
- 8,154
- Daps
- 122,280
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
CoryMack said:
I can prove it, but none of the people who believe otherwise will take my Ban Bet.
The only way they can argue against me is by using that tired tactic of calling me a 'Cac'.
Ignore that guy
He still fully believes a group of middle eastern men hijacked 4 commercial aircraft with box cutters and exploded the wtc buildings
He only believes things that white people tell him to believe
xoxodede
Superstar
Tony Martin is an Afrocentrist whose 'reserach' is biased and ahistorical, based more on conjecture and innuendo rather than facts, and is a Holocaust denier.
Try harder.
I feel bad for you.
Mr. Martin NEVER denied the Holocaust.
What's funny - this very thread is about what the Jewish Community is doing to Tamika Mallory. Which is, not "denouncing" Mr. Farrakhan and the NOI -- and her not complying to their demand -- automatically means she "anti-semitic" -- which is FALSE.
They did the same thing to Dr. Martin -- they called him a "holocaust denier" in addition to allegedly being "anti-semitic" -- because he presented a talk at the IHR -- so by him presenting for the IHR - to them means automatically he is an "Holocaust Denier" -- which is FALSE:
In June 2002, Martin presented a talk entitled "Tactics of Organized Jewry in Suppressing Free Speech"[37][38] at the 14th IHR Conference sponsored by the Institute for Historical Review,[39] in which he accused Jews of being the principal actors in the slave trade. The IHR is the world's leading Holocaust denial organization publishing articles and holding conferences denying the extermination of European Jewry in the 1930s.[40]
They came at him and his reputation HARD due to him teaching what he learned by the Jewish Scholars and sources in the The Secret Relationship -- it's pretty disgusting.
The even got HLG's the white and jewish Black ally to go at him. Shows what happened when you try to go at them. But, you know - cause you are apart of their Black attack team.
Tony Martin (professor) - Wikipedia
KingJudah2
All Star
KingJudah2
All Star
fukk you
If you think that something like The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews is a valid source, then you have serious etymological problems.
Exhibit A.
This thread is nothing but de-frosted neo-Nazi imagery and literature, microwaved and passed off as pro-black opinion.
Ain't no difference between your obvious neo-Nazi cartoon, and this other dude copying and pasting paragraphs.
Why are you focusing on 1 poster when everyone else has been dropping knowledge in a pretty respectful way??
Deflect much?
I'm focusing on two posters, actually. The one with the Nazi cartoon, and @xoxodede with his/her unoriginal walls of text.
There's gotta be a better way to put your points across.
Let A Fro Be A Fro
Superstar
Michelle Alexander is up next on that Bar Mitzvah Jam Screen.
Isaiah Bradley
Banned
Are you saying that a text from the late 19th century that highlights the minutes of a supposed meeting by Jews, mentioning the use of the media and economical tactics to manipulate, coincidentally reflects the media/economical influence that's needed forI've presented scholarship on this subject multiple times in other threads, but just so we're clear, the bulk of the 'evidence' on what you're presented thus far stems from here......
....and has been refuted multiple times, beginning in 1921 and, most recently, here.....
ALL the 'evidence' Farrakhan and your 'scholars' have used stems from the first book which was a proven hoax concocted by the Russian Secret Police in 1895.
-the creation/protection/investment of Isreal
-rap songs edited if it includes Jewish reference
-funding of Nazi efforts
-renewal of reparations from Germany and any company that owned products that the Nazi used
-laws to suppress perceived anti-Israel protest
get these nets
Veteran
@Foxtrot @Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Anytime either of you or anyone else wants to take this to the Root section, where no BS is allowed, you can catch the fade. I'm skimming the last few pages of the thread and it appears that you gentlemen are a bit confused. Every group of people have good,bad, & ugly parts of their history...including jews. Instead of acknowledging the bad and ugly, many jews want to use their positions in academia and the press to erase it or silence those who bring it up. Doing this only REINFORCES the basis of the criticisms.
Anytime either of you or anyone else wants to take this to the Root section, where no BS is allowed, you can catch the fade. I'm skimming the last few pages of the thread and it appears that you gentlemen are a bit confused. Every group of people have good,bad, & ugly parts of their history...including jews. Instead of acknowledging the bad and ugly, many jews want to use their positions in academia and the press to erase it or silence those who bring it up. Doing this only REINFORCES the basis of the criticisms.