The Zionist Jews and Jewish Community Attack on Tamika Mallory is Disgusting

[KOohbt]

This what she get tryin to have a women's group instead of a black group.


Some of these nikkas never learn

 

[Originalman]

@xoxodede

They coming at her over Russell Simmons now.

When Women’s March Leader Tamika Mallory Backed Russell Simmons, She Betrayed Women Like Me

Unfortunately, Mallory’s troubling support of violent men doesn’t stop with Farrakhan. She also continues to be a friend and ally of Russell Simmons, a man who has been accused of rape by at least eight women, myself included.

They can't find nothing that will stick so they will keep digging.

Don't be surprised that they will go through her taxes next.

 

[Originalman]

I actually know Sil Lai, the woman who wrote the piece. Though, I respect her and her work as a journalist. And I understand, support and empathize with her over her alleged claim against RS. I still stand with Tamika.

I will tell you one thing -- which I think you already know. This story and negative press against Tamika and the Women's March -- equals traffic - traffic equals money -- and a great article rate. She (Sil Lai)-- pitched (a white/gen media outlet) -- and they accepted the pitch.

A great check and link to add to her bylines.

As in sports they take black athletes to catch / chase / beat black athletes.

Your girl Sil Lai is just a journalist version of a slave catcher.

Yes we sick boss.....just as long as that check clears.

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

Nothing to answer as your question is voided by history. Jews, as a whole, don't have 'great wealth' or power. If they did, there'd be at least 6 million more of them right now.
The rest of your assertions are typical of the propaganda that's been part and parcel of the 'Jewish Conspiracy' and has NO factual basis other than circular reasoning that's been in-existence since the Middle Ages.

​

lol. Jews as whole? Jewish Conspiracy?...where did I mention any of this?..exaggerate much....rambling didn't work and now trying to reframe my point/question via exaggerations to avoid acknowledging actions by some in a group, isn't going to work too

you tried the same tactic already and got called out

The overwhelming majority of Jews had nothing to do with the slave trade. That's like saying because a few Black people are pushing drugs in the 'hood, ALL Black people are responsible for the proliferation of drugs in our neighborhoods. Utter and complete nonsense.​

In order to weaponize an ism, a "plight" needs to occur at least one time, so it can be minimized or exaggerated. Same with stereotypes, in order to weaponize stereotypes, an act must occur at least one time, so it can be minimized or exaggerated

So because the majority didn't act a certain way, then we can't acknowledge/make observations of sub-group members based on their actions because of exaggerated stereotypes. This foolish rational only benefits and empower subgroups more.
It's childish and disingenuous to need to quantify statements with "not all of the group"






Change the group from Zionist/Jewish community TO Eskimos(Inuit)....same action

-the creation/protection/investment of Alaska
-rap songs edited if it includes Eskimos reference
-funding of Algonquins efforts
-renewal of reparations from Germany and any company that owned products that the Algonquins used
-laws to suppress perceived anti-Eskimos protest

...based on these actions, I would conclude that Eskimos(Inuit) are "using money and media to influence." Would you disagree?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

lol. Jews as whole? Jewish Conspiracy?...where did I mention any of this?

Read your post responding to my post, again. Seems you missed something.​

So because the majority didn't act a certain way, then we can't acknowledge/make observations of sub-group members based on their actions because of exaggerated stereotypes.

Racists do that ALL the time, son.​

This foolish rational only benefits and empower subgroups more.

Black people are a 'subgroup' of the human race, so, by YOUR 'logic', empowering us by focusing on the majority rather than the minority is 'foolish'.​

​

It's childish and disingenuous to need to quantify statements with "not all of the group"

Then you just proved racists correct when they say things about Black people WITHOUT quantifying their statement and applying their biases to our entire group rather than the few individuals they've encountered.​

The rest of your post is just trying to justify a failed argument using a rather forced and invalid equivocation and not worth responding to.

​

 

[xCivicx]

Bump

I'm gonna get this agent above me out the paint

 

[xCivicx]

@Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

I have no desire to take your ban bet goofy

Post your pic if you're not too p*ssy to put a face to the sassiness simpleton

My pic is already up and it's been up simpleton

Be the man your father never taught you to be simpleton

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

I'm sorry - but I had to make sure I responded to this....

YES - Black jews are treated like shyt by White Jews. They don't care if they are "immigrants" or natives -- if they don't have white skin -- and can't be classified as "white" by looking at them -- they are treated like trash - or non important. Stop it.

Even in America - Black Jews complain about it. This is one of many I could post.

The overwhelming majority of Jews had nothing to do with the slave trade. That's like saying because a few Black people are pushing drugs in the 'hood, ALL Black people are responsible for the proliferation of drugs in our neighborhoods. Utter and complete nonsense.​

No, you sound off. Well, the majority of "White" people didn't have anything to do with Slavery as well -- but a damn good amount of them did. And even the ones who didn't -- they allowed it to go on.

Same for Jews -- who were also White - did as well. You do know that many Black Natives have 3-10% Ashkenazi Jewish DNA -- and you know why right? And being that most of our ancestors weren't IR dating -- and don't subscribe to it -- that would mean- those "White' enslavers were also Jewish.

See Judah P. Benjamin: Judah Benjamin

And... it's SO many resources - not even referenced by Farrakhan and NOI - that highlight their role in the trade.

But, you are clear on acting like they have no major role -- when in fact - they played a part -- and the issue is them acting like they didn't.

Jews Mostly Supported Slavery — Or Kept Silent — During Civil War
Read more: Jews Mostly Supported Slavery — Or Kept Silent — During Civil War

As Jewish historian Dale Rosengarten expresses it, quoting a Talmudic precept: “The law of the land is the law of the Jews.” From a modern perspective, it seems anomalous that a people whose history hinged on an epic escape from servitude would not have been deeply troubled by America’s “peculiar institution” — but few were.

Some Jews owned slaves, a few traded them, and the livelihoods of many, North and South, were inextricably bound to the slave system. Most southern Jews defended slavery, and some went further, advocating its expansion.

Notable among these was Judah P. Benjamin, labeled by the abolitionist Ben Wade, who served with Benjamin in the U.S. Senate, as “an Israelite with Egyptian principles.” Even in the North, many sympathized with the South and only a very few were abolitionists. Almost all Jews sought peace above all else. Until the war was at hand, they remained silent on the subject.​

Jews And Negro Slavery In The Old South - 1789-1865 : Bertram Wallace Korn : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Korn wrote twelve books on American Jewish history, the most famous being American Jewry and the Civil War, (1951). In 1962 he was named visiting professor of American Jewish history at the New York campus of Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion; in 1970 he was named to the same position at Dropsie University in Philadelphia. He also served for a period as president of the American Historical Society.

Several of his books explored Jewish history in the American South.

Other works by Korn include:

• The American Reaction to the Mortara Case: 1858-1859 (1957)
• "Benjamin Levy: New Orleans Printer and Publisher", The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 54, no. 4 (Fourth Quarter, 1960); DOI: 10.1086/pbsa.54.4.24299526; via JSTOR
• Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865, 1961, Presidential address to American Jewish Historical Society, full text online at Archive.org
• The Early Jews of New Orleans (1969)[3]
• "THE JEWS OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, PRIOR TO THE ORGANIZATION OF THE FIRST CONGREGATION, IN 1841", Hebrew Union College Annual Vol. 40/41 (1969-1970), pp. 469-502; via JSTOR
• The Jews of Mobile, Alabama, 1763-1841, Hebrew Union College Press, 1970, 63 pages

JEWS AND NEGRO SLAVERY IN THE OLD SOUTH, 1789-1865: Address of the President
JEWS AND NEGRO SLAVERY IN THE OLD SOUTH, 1789-1865: Address of the President on JSTOR

"Becoming Southern: The Jews of Savannah, Georgia, 1830-70
https://cedar.wwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=library_facpubs

Yup Jews were heavily involved with slavery and were some of the main financiers of slave ships and slave expeditions. Jews also created Wall Street based on the immense value slaves brought to the new world.

Anyone minimizing the role white Jews played perpetuating the white supremacists movement and slavery is full of shyt

 

[Isaiah Bradley]

how come I didn't get any notifications?

Read your post responding to my post, again. Seems you missed something.
Racists do that ALL the time, son.
Black people are a 'subgroup' of the human race, so, by YOUR 'logic', empowering us by focusing on the majority rather than the minority is 'foolish'.
Then you just proved racists correct when they say things about Black people WITHOUT quantifying their statement and applying their biases to our entire group rather than the few individuals they've encountered.
The rest of your post is just trying to justify a failed argument using a rather forced and invalid equivocation and not worth responding to.

​

smh. Stop with the deflections and poor attempt at trying to use my logic, to avoid applying your logic to non-jewish members...I asked you specific questions and again you can't answer because you find it difficult to uphold narratives and apply them consistently for non-jewish groups, that are doing the exact the same thing. Which is the common obstacle for identity politics