The Undoing on HBO

Stevie Ray

Can You Dig It? SUCKA!
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
152
Reputation
480
Daps
815
Reppin
110th St. Harlem NY
Grace told her lawyer friend to tell the prosecutor what to ask her.
Let me tell you something brotha, that's one of the best baby face turns I've ever seen in this business. I knew that yak was gonna flip once that fruit booty accused their son.
 

Verbal Kint

Superstar
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
4,946
Reputation
2,945
Daps
30,337
Reppin
TC, Ap
That ending would've been ok had the show been a character study. But they presented it as a murder mystery. Even then it would've been ok if he was the killer, but he was literally the killer in the exact way it was presented from the 2nd episode on. No intrigue, no interesting reasoning, nothing.
 

Tasha And

Superstar
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
7,739
Reputation
2,855
Daps
45,994
That ending would've been ok had the show been a character study. But they presented it as a murder mystery. Even then it would've been ok if he was the killer, but he was literally the killer in the exact way it was presented from the 2nd episode on. No intrigue, no interesting reasoning, nothing.
Yeah from my skimming through the wiki, the book the show was based on is called "You Should Have Known" and the whole thing is an indictment on Grace for not knowing that her husband was a sociopath capable of murder, when she spent her entire career telling her clients they should have caught the signs. The husband isn't even in the book.

So Nicole Kidman and the writers obviously wanted the show to be more of a mystery than the book, when the actual story they adapted didn't really merit a "who dun it" focus.

Show would have been far stronger if it kept the focus from the book and made it a character study on Grace as a person and doctor, examining how her wealth, race, class privilege, and arrogance blinded her from the truth. They should have dropped pretense of the murderer being in doubt by the audience, which conditioned everyone to search for suspects while watching which left many feeling let down by the obvious/straightforward conclusion that made sense in the book but felt anticlimatic in the show.
 
Last edited:

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,421
Reputation
2,866
Daps
68,522
Reppin
New York
That ending would've been ok had the show been a character study. But they presented it as a murder mystery. Even then it would've been ok if he was the killer, but he was literally the killer in the exact way it was presented from the 2nd episode on. No intrigue, no interesting reasoning, nothing.
They did throw a lot of dialogue, people acting weird and other weird like flashbacks or imaginings to try and throw the audience off.
For example, when Hugh Grant leaves the party saying he has to help a patient they show a scene where he is talking to one of his patients using a grade A bedside manner and they muse about the patience chances of living. And it is filmed thru like a filter to insinuate someone is imagining it but not explicitly saying so. And the next scene is Hugh Grant getting in bed with Nicole Kidman all sad like that patient died. I poured over that in my mind more than a few times but in the end it amounted to 0 for the plot.
I stuck with Hugh Grant being the killer because they presented 0 hard evidence it could even possibility be anyone else. But by this thread you see a lot of soft evidence and the history of the mystery drama that 'the obvious perpetrator rarely does it' made people guess differently. It's like they subverted expectations by keeping it extremely simple/straightforward. That's actually kind of interesting, it used the audience expectations to cloud the story and not actual real information/evidence.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
179,460
Reputation
22,464
Daps
586,724
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Yeah from my skimming through the wiki, the book the show was based on is called "You Should Have Known" and the whole thing is an indictment on Grace for not knowing that her husband was a sociopath capable of murder, when she spent her entire career telling her clients they should have caught the signs. The husband isn't even in the book.

So Nicole Kidman and the writers obviously wanted the show to be more of a mystery than the book, when the actual story they adapted didn't really merit a "who dun it" focus.

Show would have been far stronger if it kept the focus from the book and made it a character study on Grace as a person and doctor, examining how her wealth, race, class privilege, and arrogance blinded her from the truth. They should have dropped pretense of the murderer being in doubt by the audience, which conditioned everyone to search for suspects while watching which left many feeling let down by the obvious/straightforward conclusion that made sense in the book but felt anticlimatic in the show.


The show would have likely been a little better (I still liked this show for what it is anyway) but I doubt it would have gained any real traction. The Undoing was trending all day today and a lot of it is tied to the "Who Dun It?" concept... you take away the mystery from the show and do more of a character study and I don't think nearly as many people get involved with it... so that's the tradeoff.

I feel if you are making that trade then the ending needs to be a little bit more exciting than the conclusion of him just getting arrested again. We already saw him taken away in handcuffs.
 

Trav

Marathon Mentality 🏁
Supporter
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
28,639
Reputation
5,091
Daps
80,607
Reppin
TMC 8-24
That ending would've been ok had the show been a character study. But they presented it as a murder mystery. Even then it would've been ok if he was the killer, but he was literally the killer in the exact way it was presented from the 2nd episode on. No intrigue, no interesting reasoning, nothing.

I do get this gripe. That's one thing I will say they dropped the ball on. They saw an easy out to drum up interest and social currency with presenting it as some Escape Room special type of shyt knowing it was really more of a case/character study which would not have gathered NEARLY as much interest otherwise. The show would not have been something to latch onto & promoting water cooler talk/word of mouth if it came straightforward with it.

I'm still not mad at it though, lol.
 

TOAD99

Veteran
Joined
Feb 15, 2015
Messages
25,268
Reputation
3,925
Daps
101,731
Not mad at the end :yeshrug: really good series, acting and cinematography despite a weak-ish finale

i sorta wanted the kid to have been the killer:mjlol:

but damn the dad was an a$$hole Trynna pin it on his kid :pachaha:

I need more Elena and her t*ts on my screen:wow:
 

Mission249

All Star
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
782
Reputation
345
Daps
3,190
Reppin
NULL
That ending would've been ok had the show been a character study. But they presented it as a murder mystery.
I think we wanted it to be a murder mystery more than they did. If I sat here and listed out all the evidence they presented against the husband - anyone would be insane to think anyone else did it but him.
The husband's mom was on video like "He killed his sister and showed no remorse! He's a psycopath! :usure:" and we're still like "...I wonder if the little boy did it :ohhh:"

In retrospect, we got played just like the wife got played. She wanted her husband to be romantic comedy Hugh Grant, and we wanted a murder mystery. It ended up being a character study.

I stuck with Hugh Grant being the killer because they presented 0 hard evidence it could even possibility be anyone else. But by this thread you see a lot of soft evidence and the history of the mystery drama that 'the obvious perpetrator rarely does it' made people guess differently. It's like they subverted expectations by keeping it extremely simple/straightforward. That's actually kind of interesting, it used the audience expectations to cloud the story and not actual real information/evidence.
Exactly. The shyt was straight forward from the jump. And typically in shows like this we're all like "How could the wife be so dumb!?" but none of us want to admit we got played ourselves. That's the most interesting thing they could do. Any other twist would've been some contrived M. Night Shyamalan shyt.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,421
Reputation
2,866
Daps
68,522
Reppin
New York
I think we wanted it to be a murder mystery more than they did. If I sat here and listed out all the evidence they presented against the husband - anyone would be insane to think anyone else did it but him.
The husband's mom was on video like "He killed his sister and showed no remorse! He's a psycopath! :usure:" and we're still like "...I wonder if the little boy did it :ohhh:"

In retrospect, we got played just like the wife got played. She wanted her husband to be romantic comedy Hugh Grant, and we wanted a murder mystery. It ended up being a character study.


Exactly. The shyt was straight forward from the jump. And typically in shows like this we're all like "How could the wife be so dumb!?" but none of us want to admit we got played ourselves. That's the most interesting thing they could do. Any other twist would've been some contrived M. Night Shyamalan shyt.
And you know what even the marketing of the show helped lead the audience on as well that's pretty dope, very subversive.
 

GoldenGlove

😐😑😶😑😐
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
58,849
Reputation
5,536
Daps
138,692
I would of preferred if he beat the case and then they show Grace finding the murder weapon.

:yeshrug:
 

Cave Savage

Feminist
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
13,471
Reputation
530
Daps
32,262
Reppin
Women's rights
That was disappointing, I was hoping for it to be pretty much anyone but him. I thought the angle they were going for was "he is a scumbag but not a killer" yet he was just a straight up killer.


BUT it was still worth it to see Mathilda de Angelis butt naked, goddamn she's fine. And the cinematography was dope.
 

Cave Savage

Feminist
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
13,471
Reputation
530
Daps
32,262
Reppin
Women's rights
My mom was telling me how Hugh Grant sunk his reputation back in the day after being caught with a prostitute

These days nobody would give a shyt
 
Top