The UFO/UAP disclosure thread

Joe Sixpack

Build and Destroy
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
39,053
Reputation
4,993
Daps
110,064
Reppin
Rotten Apple
Here’s something that concerns me. 50 years ago this documentary I posted below was made with FULL cooperation of the department of defense and Nasa. It includes statement from various government officials and nasa with documented UFO’s captured during space missions. This is coming directly from their mouth, with evidence provided.




At this point you have to be blind to disregard the testimony of all these professionals. What I believe is this, a higher intelligence is operating with impunity over our airspace. We are no longer top of the food chain. Collectively We are used to being the observers, not the observed. Admitting it doesn’t solve the issue of what to do about it. It may be repeatable in observations but not repeatable in bringing forth. A mouse in a cage realizing he’s being filmed brings no further insight other than knowing it’s being filmed. m These things operate past our known capability. From the military, specifically the Air Force standpoint we don’t want to fukk with these things and stir up the hornets nest. That why I believe the Air Force has been so resistant since project blue boom. They know it’s there but know there is nothing they can do about it. That you deny until you can replicate. Admitting you don’t have air superiority now defeats the purpose of your organization existing.

:wow:

The is terrifying
 

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
40,777
Reputation
18,047
Daps
148,398
Reppin
Humanity
Regarding underwater UAP's and Aasuming that whales and dolphins are trained for combat with UAPs, the Navy could deploy them as part of their underwater defense strategy. Whales and dolphins could be equipped with specialized gear and devices that enhance their natural abilities, such as sonar and echolocation. They could also be trained to detect and identify UAPs, and to engage them in various ways.

For example, dolphins could be trained to attach small explosives or tracking devices onto UAPs, or to use their speed and agility to ram them. Whales could be used as a larger and more powerful force, able to deliver devastating blows with their massive bodies. They could also be equipped with sensors to detect and track UAPs over long distances.

The Navy could also use octopuses in their defense strategy, as these creatures are known for their remarkable camouflage abilities and could be trained to blend in with their surroundings and avoid detection by UAPs. They could also be trained to collect intelligence on UAP movements and activities, and to relay this information to the Navy for analysis and decision-making.

Overall, the use of trained marine animals in underwater defense against UAPs would require extensive research, development, and training, but it could potentially provide a unique and effective approach to combating this mysterious threat.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MMS

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
82,205
Reputation
11,628
Daps
324,246
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
Here’s something that concerns me. 50 years ago this documentary I posted below was made with FULL cooperation of the department of defense and Nasa. It includes statement from various government officials and nasa with documented UFO’s captured during space missions. This is coming directly from their mouth, with evidence provided.




At this point you have to be blind to disregard the testimony of all these professionals. What I believe is this, a higher intelligence is operating with impunity over our airspace. We are no longer top of the food chain. Collectively We are used to being the observers, not the observed. Admitting it doesn’t solve the issue of what to do about it. It may be repeatable in observations but not repeatable in bringing forth. A mouse in a cage realizing he’s being filmed brings no further insight other than knowing it’s being filmed. These things operate past our known capability. From the military, specifically the Air Force standpoint we don’t want to fukk with these things and stir up the hornets nest. That why I believe the Air Force has been so resistant since project blue book. They know it’s there but know there is nothing they can do about it. That why they deny until they can replicate. Admitting you don’t have air superiority now defeats the purpose of your organization existing.


Nobody trying to hear these twilight zone sounding ass nikkas :unimpressed:
 

Hawaiian Punch

umop-apisdn
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
18,474
Reputation
6,632
Daps
80,071
Reppin
The I in Team
Nobody trying to hear these twilight zone sounding ass nikkas :unimpressed:

Nobody is forcing you to. Doesn’t change the fact that 90% of the people in the movie are military aviators, nasa scientists and researchers. Also doesn’t change the fact that the movie was sponsored by Nasa and the Department of Defense as a direct way to address the reality of the phenomenon to the American people 50 fukking years ago. Nasa getting involved in the research now doesn’t address what they are said in this movie decades ago(starts at 11:32 btw)

I don’t blame you for feeling that way. Honestly we all have an expectation for how this should play out and when it doesn’t fit our vision we ignore it. You literally have nasa scientists in the movie like “most astronauts had encounters with UFO’s on missions. Here are pictures and videos and statements from the astronauts” and people are like :unimpressed:

It is what it is.
 

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
82,205
Reputation
11,628
Daps
324,246
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
Nobody is forcing you to. Doesn’t change the fact that 90% of the people in the movie are military aviators, nasa scientists and researchers. Also doesn’t change the fact that the movie was sponsored by Nasa and the Department of Defense as a direct way to address the reality of the phenomenon to the American people 50 fukking years ago. Nasa getting involved in the research now doesn’t address what they are said in this movie decades ago(starts at 11:32 btw)

I don’t blame you for feeling that way. Honestly we all have an expectation for how this should play out and when it doesn’t fit our vision we ignore it. You literally have nasa scientists in the movie like “most astronauts had encounters with UFO’s on missions. Here are pictures and videos and statements from the astronauts” and people are like :unimpressed:

It is what it is.
Did you see this?

 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,908
Reppin
the ether



lol, this guy has been claiming this story for 30 years about something that supposedly happen 60 years ago. His story keeps changing and he's never once produced a single bit of evidence or a single witness to the UFOs. (He says he was "told" about the UFOs over the telephone, but can't name the people who told him or saw them.)

Nuclear missiles in the 1960s were going off-line constantly for all sorts of different reasons. My guess is that someone on the base had a UFO sighting, it coincided with one of the many times that some of the missiles went off-line for one reason or another, he was the new guy on base so he freaked out about it and from there the story built into some grand narrative in his head.
 

Micky Mikey

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
16,052
Reputation
3,017
Daps
89,763
lol, this guy has been claiming this story for 30 years about something that supposedly happen 60 years ago. His story keeps changing and he's never once produced a single bit of evidence or a single witness to the UFOs. (He says he was "told" about the UFOs over the telephone, but can't name the people who told him or saw them.)

Nuclear missiles in the 1960s were going off-line constantly for all sorts of different reasons. My guess is that someone on the base had a UFO sighting, it coincided with one of the many times that some of the missiles went off-line for one reason or another, he was the new guy on base so he freaked out about it and from there the story built into some grand narrative in his head.
Admittedly I have to do more research on the case. It stands out because of its relation with nuclear war heads.

You're pretty adament about debunking a lot UFO cases. Are there any cases that make you think there may be something more to it?

I started taking interest in the topic after my own experience and am always amazed at how so many witness account corroborate with each other and with what I saw.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,696
Daps
203,908
Reppin
the ether
Admittedly I have to do more research on the case. It stands out because of its relation with nuclear war heads.

You're pretty adament about debunking a lot UFO cases. Are there any cases that make you think there may be something more to it?

I started taking interest in the topic after my own experience and am always amazed at how so many witness account corroborate with each other and with what I saw.


There's been stuff that's intrigued me at the time. Then new information gets revealed that makes it seem not nearly as interesting as it was before. At this point, I can't think of any particularly eye-opening cases that make me doubt my general conclusion that no civilization with sufficient travel capacity is within view of us.
 
Top