The truth about Kobe Bryant

Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
43,798
Reputation
2,757
Daps
107,061
Reppin
NULL
This is the GOAT if you dont agree you dont know basketball

abd0-004.jpg

Haha....:win:

Lou Alcindor is in the building
 

Jram

Rookie
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
460
Reputation
0
Daps
154
Reppin
NULL
Because you can't predict the future. Why make yourself look stupid as hell later on making wild declarations now.


I'm a Kobe fan. Imagine if I said Kobe had three rings by his 6th season. Jordan had none. Therefore, Kobe gonna win more rings than Jordan :lolbron: How fukking retarded would I have looked around 2008 :upsetfavre:

I didn't make a wild declaration. I said LeBron is one of the five best players ever on a epr game basis, and 9 years is enough to proclaim that.

I didn't say who had the best career or who had the most titles. Rings really have nothing to do with what I said.
 

Jram

Rookie
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
460
Reputation
0
Daps
154
Reppin
NULL
You killing me dude. Large sample sizes? Really? This is sports not a census or survey.

The context is the type of ball that was played at that time and how that player got it done when you was watching.

I thought large sample size was a fairly usable term here.

You didn't answer my question. Your mocking the use of statistics in an argument, which is the objective reflection of what happens on the court, for your subjective context. I asked you what about that make Bryant better than Wade. You still haven't answered
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
43,798
Reputation
2,757
Daps
107,061
Reppin
NULL
I thought large sample size was a fairly usable term here.

You didn't answer my question. Your mocking the use of statistics in an argument, which is the objective reflection of what happens on the court, for your subjective context. I asked you what about that make Bryant better than Wade. You still haven't answered

Dude. No one(who is respectable) uses an erp equation to determine greatness in sports. Stats are not the objective reflection of what happens on the court because stats can be manipulated and misleading. You gotta see how the games play out for yourself.

To answer your question about what makes Kobe better than Wade is actually quite simple.. EVERYTHING
 

Goatpoacher

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
8,335
Reputation
575
Daps
16,042
Dude. No one(who is respectable) uses an erp equation to determine greatness in sports. Stats are not the objective reflection of what happens on the court because stats can be manipulated and misleading. You gotta see how the games play out for yourself.

To answer your question about what makes Kobe better than Wade is actually quite simple.. EVERYTHING

So using statistics is meaningless, but just saying "EVERYTHING!" is thorough analysis.

You are as braindead a c*nt as your namesake.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
43,798
Reputation
2,757
Daps
107,061
Reppin
NULL
So using statistics is meaningless, but just saying "EVERYTHING!" is thorough analysis.

You are as braindead a c*nt as your namesake.

What's braindead is asking how is Kobe better than Wade Even if its a rhetorical question, it's still not worthy of a response.

That's like asking if p*ssy is better than a trip to the zoo. Yall new nikkas kill me man. No wonder we losing out chea. Maybe you'll respect it better if I qoute a CAC.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." Mark Twain
 

Jram

Rookie
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
460
Reputation
0
Daps
154
Reppin
NULL
Dude. No one(who is respectable) uses an erp equation to determine greatness in sports. Stats are not the objective reflection of what happens on the court because stats can be manipulated and misleading. You gotta see how the games play out for yourself.

To answer your question about what makes Kobe better than Wade is actually quite simple.. EVERYTHING

Stats in large sample sizes and context aren't misleading. They're accurate and objective, and can confirm what you saw or prove to you that what you saw is wrong.

I can't debate you when you tell me "EVERYTHING" makes Bryant better than Wade, because you have your own subjective reasons for viewing it that way and your not elaborating any further.

I just don't understand why you shyt on a argument that's based on facts.
 

TheNig

Dr.TheNig DDS
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
55,260
Reputation
5,767
Daps
115,595
Reppin
Brolic... Alcoholics
The truth about Kobe is he's been so great at what he does For so long that he's been compared to greatness in 2 eras of the game. And sadly nikkas like you, instead of accepting the greatness find ways to knock it.

First it was TMac and Vince
Now its Durant, LeBron, and Wade.
 

Marvel

Psalm 149:5-9
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
8,804
Reputation
818
Daps
15,170
Reppin
House of Yasharahla
The truth about Kobe is he's been so great at what he does For so long that he's been compared to greatness in 2 eras of the game. And sadly nikkas like you, instead of accepting the greatness find ways to knock it.

First it was TMac and Vince
Now its Durant, LeBron, and Wade.

That means nothing...that happens with any great player, Lebron will get the same treatment when younger guys like Parker and Wiggins get into the league. He already been compared with Kobe, Wade, Melo, Durant, and Rose.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
1,071
Reputation
0
Daps
574
Stats in large sample sizes and context aren't misleading. They're accurate and objective, and can confirm what you saw or prove to you that what you saw is wrong.

I can't debate you when you tell me "EVERYTHING" makes Bryant better than Wade, because you have your own subjective reasons for viewing it that way and your not elaborating any further.

I just don't understand why you shyt on a argument that's based on facts.
:what: SHUT YO DUMB ASS UP
 

TheNig

Dr.TheNig DDS
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
55,260
Reputation
5,767
Daps
115,595
Reppin
Brolic... Alcoholics
That means nothing...that happens with any great player, Lebron will get the same treatment when younger guys like Parker and Wiggins get into the league. He already been compared with Kobe, Wade, Melo, Durant, and Rose.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2

Don't care what you have to say. I said what i said and that's final.
 
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
1,071
Reputation
0
Daps
574
That means nothing...that happens with any great player, Lebron will get the same treatment when younger guys like Parker and Wiggins get into the league. He already been compared with Kobe, Wade, Melo, Durant, and Rose.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT? SHUT YO DUMB ASS UP
 
Top