The Tariq Nasheed Thread

[Bud Bundy]

Even if that was the case how often does the supreme court reside over case of pedophilia?

 

[Lord Beasley]

This bytch , Ketanji claimed she didn't even know what a woman was. Dead serious.

shes a judge idiot. thats a trap question in 2022

 

[Prodyson]

In what way is the nomination and appointment of this wench a success for black people? Y’all always treat symbolism as a sufficient victory, as the material reality of our community remains unchanged or worsens.

The largest word in my comment was POSSIBLE. That means it may or may not be. But you ignored. But it MOST cases, having a black person in a position of power is better than NOT having one.

 

[Lord Beasley]

And 20+ need to get bushed too. It’s the same y’all with the shilling

you need to be bushed for using this bigass font regularly. are you that starved for attention?

 

[alpo]

you need to be bushed for using this bigass font regularly. are you that starved for attention?

Goofy why you crying bout fonts? No wonder women don’t touch y’all

 

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

Dude pushes republican lies at every opportunity and what's worse is that many negroes are so susceptible to misinformation that they believe it.

yep

 

[Lord Beasley]

Goofy why you crying bout fonts? No wonder women don’t touch y’all

i have a life p*ssy, you get none

 

[8WON6]

As much as I want Tariq to be wrong about this sadly he's probably right

this is why people need to try their best not to mention Tariq when there's an actual issue to discuss. Take Tariq out the OP and thread title and this would be a completely different thread.

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

He's not wrong. Between her empathy for sexual predators and refusing to define what a woman is, she makes Sotomayor and Kagan cringe with how radical she is. She'll sit on the SC for 30+ if she's confirmed. She's a Trojan Horse for further degeneracy.

He's wrong.

Josh Hawley’s latest attack on Ketanji Brown Jackson is genuinely nauseating

Sentencing Law and Policy

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

So a poster says that there is a disinformation campaign with Tariq’s propaganda on the coli and he gets a “racism/race-baiting” warning and bushed.

Wow.

I was pretty shocked by that too….. makes ya wonder

 

[Pull Up the Roots]

This is a fair attack on her.

No, it's not.

The unwarranted complaints that potential Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson was unfair to Black workers who sued Lockheed Martin: Did Ketanji Brown Jackson rule against Black workers? It’s not so simple.

By Kenneth W. Mack and Andre M. Davis

Now, in a modern twist on the story of Motley and the discrimination lawsuit, a Black former judge has criticized one potential nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit for supposedly betraying a class of Black Lockheed Martin workers — by disapproving a proposed settlement when she was a district court judge.

In a letter to Biden, former district judge U.W. Clemon of Alabama asserted that Jackson should not be selected because she has not done enough “for the cause of justice and equality.” Clemon said that her decision to disapprove of the settlement is “a bell sounding the alarm that if Judge Jackson is appointed to the Supreme Court, simple justice and equality in the workplace will be sacrificed.” Clemon, in the letter, challenged several of her procedural decisions in the case but took most direct aim at her rejection of the settlement.

The Lockheed Martin case was a class-action suit in which the plaintiffs claimed to represent more than 5,500 current and former Black Lockheed employees. Because it was a class action, Jackson had a duty to protect the interests of the Black workers who were not in court but who would still be bound by the terms of the settlement. Clemon is listed as counsel to the firm that brought the case.

Jackson found in 2017 that the proposed class did not satisfy what is called the “commonality” requirement, which is designed to ensure that there is enough overlap between all the class members’ claims for it to make sense to resolve them all together. In doing so, she was applying a 2011 — and controversial — Supreme Court decision about employment discrimination class actions. The problem with the settlement, Jackson concluded, was that the proposed class of Lockheed employees “encompasse[d] individuals with widely varying experiences of discrimination.”

Jackson also ruled that the proposed settlement was not fair, reasonable and adequate because many Black employees would be abandoning potential discrimination claims without knowing what they were giving up and what monetary compensation or other relief they were likely to get in return. Every one of Lockheed’s Black employees would have had to give up all rights to sue the company for any kind of past discrimination to obtain a settlement in this one particular case, which challenged one particular employment practice of the company. Jackson believed that trade-off was unfair.

Does this indicate that Jackson is biased against, or for, Black plaintiffs or claims of workplace discrimination? At worst, Jackson seems to have been protecting one group of Black Lockheed employees from having their interests sacrificed for those of another group of Black employees. The history of African American federal judges, and of worries that they might be biased in discrimination cases, should lead one to be humble about drawing such broad conclusions, based on limited proof, about what a Black female justice is likely to do on the court.

A Black female justice will be an immensely powerful symbol of the past and future of this county, as Motley and her generation of judges knew all too well. We should expect great things of those who carry such symbolic weight on their shoulders. But we should expect, as well, the same things of them that we expect of any other judge — absent clear evidence to the contrary.

 

[Godless Socialist CEO]

this is why people need to try their best not to mention Tariq when there's an actual issue to discuss. Take Tariq out the OP and thread title and this would be a completely different thread.

No it wouldn’t because this is still literally a talking circulating on white supremacist talking spaces including on Tucker Carlson’s show.

TLR stays getting played by right wing disinformation

 

[Nicole0416_718_929_646212]

TLR is part of the wench defense league now and pro-white agendas of the politico now. Interesting.

But there's two threads going on the front page about how Tariq's mother in law is white and how he is a "hyprocrite" due to indirect familial ties, but apparently being a swirler directly married to a white man is okay as a judicial representative, who gives out lighter sentences to white child molestors but black drug dealers for since legalized weed while sitting behind bars for a decade is also ok bc politics. Also, she really answered that "she doesn't know what a woman is"- with that gender fluid identity mentally ill babble to satisfy her "other" constituents. Fits all 3 categories and anyone opposing or questioning her is an "agent". fukkin done- infiltration complete.

 

[CrushedGroove]

I see a lot a lot of posters saying we shouldn't be championing her because she's a bedwench while quoting and championing the same guy attacking her, who has a WHITE wife.

 

[8WON6]

No it wouldn’t because this is still literally a talking circulating on white supremacist talking spaces including on Tucker Carlson’s show.

TLR stays getting played by right wing disinformation

just because a right wing person brought up the issue does that make it automatically wrong? (in theory.....before you goofies start claiming shyt about me) If she is lenient on pedofiles, political affiliation shouldn't matter it should be an issue to be discussed.

but yeah, when yall want to discuss these issues and Tariq is dropped right in the middle of it, you get threads like this. A bunch of "he's right, but fukk him and his mama in law white...he hatin on....". thread is just about him.