The Tariq Nasheed Thread

TripleAgent

FBA. ZayK
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
34,573
Reputation
4,904
Daps
86,707
Reppin
Baltimore
I am 100% against illegal immigrants, but I'm not a dumbass single issue voter who hates gay ppl...what do Black ppl gain from a Republican preisdent? I live in a red state where the governor is an italian, no spoon using fakkit and he's heavily cracking down on illegal workers but he replaced Black history with Asian history this week, gerrymandered the fukk out of this state like it's the 60s, and is wasting time fighting Disney...but it's ok Jose and fakkits are getting attacked :troll:
Facts. What do Black people gain from a Democrat president?
 

Wiseborn

Superstar
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
21,681
Reputation
1,642
Daps
48,443
We are pretty much already at the point where they know they wont need us. Thats why Biden told those black leaders "Yall need to go focus on securing that latino vote:ufdup:". They want the latino vote so they at least no longer have to try to cater to black people. Why? Because as you said the country is still 67% white. If they can secure the latino vote,i wonder if they will make a transformation. You cant completely take race out of politics,because its a tried and true motivator of people. But black people better really get on board with the whole "people of color" thing. Because your about a season or two away. We will be the backup minority group to latinos,who will get majority of the pandering. There will be more Adobo seasining in the purse than hotsauce. More coming out to Bad Bunny songs than Al Green.


So essentially what Im saying is its probably already too late for #Bothsides. As far as gaining political headway and advantages. But its not too late for black people to become completely disenfranchised and consider leaving the country. A little more disrespect,a little more staying stagnant,a little less comfortability. Once black folks last hope #TheDemocrats pull they Peter/Judas move,all the dominoes will fall:respect:
I agree with you especially the leaving part. I'm already gone.
 

North of Death

All Star
Bushed
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
4,286
Reputation
-516
Daps
11,813
What agenda did Nike have against the NFL? What reason would they even have a puppet for? You sound dumb. Respectfully
"What agenda did Nike have against the NFL?"..none that's the point...Kaepernick's agenda was self serving anyway and did nothing to elevate the standing of African Americans.....that's not anywhere near the work of Dr. Muhammad, the last of the uncompromised Black leadership class
 

A Pimp Named Slickback

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 22, 2018
Messages
9,570
Reputation
5,050
Daps
43,132
Reppin
Woodcrest
"What agenda did Nike have against the NFL?"..none that's the point...Kaepernick's agenda was self serving anyway and did nothing to elevate the standing of African Americans.....that's not anywhere near the work of Dr. Muhammad, the last of the uncompromised Black leadership class
I said Kaep was the CLOSEST we have to one. Yall dont read man. Just looking over the most important parts of posts and arguing over nothing
Putting you on ignore. Nothing personal. Low cognition is just contagious on here

 

Iverson_64

Superstar
Joined
May 31, 2022
Messages
2,822
Reputation
1,516
Daps
13,065
Weird that this thread got bumped but I'll just say this. There's a big difference between Black conservatism and White conservatism in the American context.

Black Christians and elders who rail against certain social issues and causes don't really seek to strip them of their rights and freedom whereas White social conservatives do. White conservativism is more than about social issues. It's about protecting the status quo, White fragility, bootstrap philosophy, and being reactionary towards anyone perceived as a threat to the power structure.

To separate conservatism from race is something that can only be done in a homogenous country with little to no racial dynamics at play. But, in America, it's very hard to separate the 2. Conservatives in the 1860's were arguing that Black people were better off as slaves than being emancipated. Conservatives in the 1960's were arguing that Black people were better off in Jim Crow than having equal rights. And the list goes on. Conservatives eventually being against those things was a case of Liberals at that time influencing their opinions and changing the status quo rather than Conservatism itself evolving. Conservatism by definition is stubborn and prefers to keep the status quo or White America comfortable. The real trailblazers for Black America and others were the Liberals. Hell, MLK was slandered as a radical Marxist and Communist by the Right Wingers of his heyday despite having so-called "socially conservative" attributes to him such as being a preacher.

I'm not even talking about Democrats vs. Republicans here. I'm just saying, in general, socially liberal people were at the forefront of Black rights, worker's rights, women's rights, etc. and, if those people fell back and left things in the hands of conservatives, very little progress would be made.

Tariq probably thinks that being against Trans in bathrooms automatically makes him socially conservatitve but I would argue that it makes him more of a moderate. Supporting reparations as a movement literally contradicts the conservative mindset of pulling up your bootstraps because you're literally demanding that the government compensate you for past labor which conservatives consider to be Socialism or even Communism.

I could go on but, overall, social conservatism doesn't mean much for Black people in a multicultural country like the USA where White America's branch of conservatism is(and has always been) different from ours.

Plus, as I mentioned in another thread, getting married, going to church, not drinking/doing drugs, and having a sense of morality doesn't automatically make you socially conservative. There's plenty of socially liberal people who do those things. In fact, it's the norm for liberal minded people.
 
Last edited:

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,134
Reputation
6,799
Daps
143,907
Reppin
CookoutGang
Weird that this thread got bumped but I'll just say this. There's a big difference between Black conservatism and White conservatism in the American context.

Black Christians and elders who rail against certain social issues and causes don't really seek to strip them of their rights and freedom whereas White social conservatives do. White conservativism is more than about social issues. It's about protecting the status quo, White fragility, bootstrap philosophy, and being reactionary towards anyone perceived as a threat to the power structure.

To separate conservatism from race is something that can only be done in a homogenous country with little to no racial dynamics at play. But, in America, it's very hard to separate the 2. Conservatives in the 1860's were arguing that Black people were better off as slaves than being emancipated. Conservatives in the 1960's were arguing that Black people were better off in Jim Crow than having equal rights. And the list goes on. Conservatives eventually being against those things was a case of Liberals at that time influencing their opinions and changing the status quo rather than Conservatism itself evolving. Conservatism by definition is stubborn and prefers to keep the status quo or White America comfortable. The real trailblazers for Black America and others were the Liberals. Hell, MLK was slandered as a radical Marxist and Communist by the Right Wingers of his heyday despite having so-called "socially conservative" attributes to him such as being a preacher.

I'm not even talking about Democrats vs. Republicans here. I'm just saying, in general, socially liberal people were at the forefront of Black rights, worker's rights, women's rights, etc. and, if those people fell back and left things in the hands of conservatives, very little progress would be made.

Tariq probably thinks that being against Trans in bathrooms automatically makes him socially conservatitve but I would argue that it makes him more of a moderate. Supporting reparations as a movement literally contradicts the conservative mindset of pulling up your bootstraps because you're literally demanding that the government compensate you for past labor which conservatives consider to be Socialism or even Communism.

I could go on but, overall, social conservatism doesn't mean much for Black people in a multicultural country like the USA where White America's branch of conservatism is(and has always been) different from hours.

Plus, as I mentioned in another thread, getting married, going to church, not drinking/doing drugs, and having a sense of morality doesn't automatically make you socially conservative. There's plenty of socially liberal people who do those things. In fact, it's the norm for liberal minded people.
Black people aren’t conservative. In America that means rolling back everything black people died for.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
5,448
Reputation
3,246
Daps
25,565
Bunchy Carter was a Panther and a Marxist too :dead:


He's some clown ass dipshyt that purposely chose that name to peddle white supremacist talking points using the name of a black revolutionary. He's one of the top 5 biggest MAGA supporting Trump d*ck suckers on this board.

The internet has really protected alot of these "edgy", void of any purpose in life sh*tstains from getting their teeth kicked out of their mouths.
 
Top