The Sun is 400 times larger than the Moon, but also 400 times farther away than the Moon from Earth

[Jalether]

If the sun was that far, you could not see it. Believe in simulated phenomena brehs.

 

[null]

@ABC123

Also, thrust/propulsion DOES NOT and CANNOT work in a vacuum

1. Inertia, Momentum exist in a "vacuum" no?

2. Space is NOT a vacuum.

 

[null]

The @Coli



'nuff said.

p.s. someone is messing with your DNS settings. log your IP to a site which we can use for when your name resolution fails. I'm sure @Swagnificent can show you how.

 

[null]

Can you explain why the constellations haven't changed for millennia?

Put moons and planets and all sort of massive tings in the sky but somehow cannot move lightblubs in the firmament brehs ...

 

[xCivicx]

Are you saying you're smarter than he was?

Im saying he stole other peoples ideas and "his" theories do not apply to reality

 

[xCivicx]

1. Inertia, Momentum exist in a "vacuum" no?

2. Space is NOT a vacuum.

1. Irrelevant conjecture. Thrust/propulsion does not work in a vacuum

2. Space is a vacuum according to your science priests. If you disagree then take that up with them

 

[xCivicx]

Put moons and planets and all sort of massive tings in the sky but somehow cannot move lightblubs in the firmament brehs ...

I don't think I know what this is supposed to mean...

 

[SwizzLake]

How did they determined the distance between the Sun and the Moon?

 

[null]

1. Irrelevant conjecture. Thrust/propulsion does not work in a vacuum

2. Space is a vacuum according to your science priests. If you disagree then take that up with them

"Outer space is not completely empty—it is a hard vacuum containing a low density of particles, predominantly a plasma of hydrogen and helium, as well as electromagnetic radiation, magnetic fields, neutrinos, dust, and cosmic rays."

Outer space - Wikipedia

 

[null]

1. Irrelevant conjecture. Thrust/propulsion does not work in a vacuum

It is not. With Inertia and no 3rd law of motion (as you claim so no thrust) nothing would move. Including the Earth, the Moon, the Solar System.

Let me say that again.

Given Inertia we need "thrust" (force) to get things moving.

If as you claim Thrust does not work then things would all still be standing still i.e. no movement of planetary bodies. The moon would not be moving.

Understand now?

 

[xCivicx]

"Outer space is not completely empty—it is a hard vacuum containing a low density of particles, predominantly a plasma of hydrogen and helium, as well as electromagnetic radiation, magnetic fields, neutrinos, dust, and cosmic rays."

Outer space - Wikipedia

Thank you for proving my point

 

[xCivicx]

It is not. With Inertia and no 3rd law of motion (as you claim so no thrust) nothing would move. Including the Earth, the Moon, the Solar System.

Let me say that again.

Given Inertia we need "thrust" (force) to get things moving.

If as you claim Thrust does not work then things would all still be standing still i.e. no movement of planetary bodies. The moon would not be moving.

Understand now?

Now you're starting to understand

 

[xCivicx]

How did they determined the distance between the Sun and the Moon?

Guessing

The distance has officially changed like 3 times yet all the math remained pretty much the exact same, which should tell you something

At one point it was only 5 million miles iirc

 

[null]

Poor attempt at framing

Poor attempt at a dodge.

Explain GPS.. explain the need for us to account for the effect of the Earth's mass on time.
As you shift your position on earth GPS satellite' distances and their visibility shift in line with a curved surface.

 

[null]

Now you're starting to understand

Yeah, Lawd ha mercy.

And with that he was gone .

You are not serious.