Yes it doesE=More Cac shyt squared.
Yes it doesE=More Cac shyt squared.
??Interesting.....its like we are in a fish bowl and the govt had a operation called "fishbowl"?
When did you realize you were a dumb fukk?
Alberto einstein was an actor that stole the majority of his "ideas" from actually intelligent scientistsGo ahead and say it so everyone can understand it...
You think you are more knowledgeable about the nature of reality than albert einstein?
“Albert Einstein was once asked, 'How does it feel to be the smartest man alive?', he responded, 'I don't know, you'll have to ask Nikola Tesla.'” ... “Albert Einstein was once asked, 'How does it feel to be the smartest man alive?', he responded, 'I don't know, you'll have to ask Nikola Tesla.'”
In 1934, on the occasion of his 79th birthday, Tesla denounced relativity theory as "a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king" and "a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense... the theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors.... its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved." (NYT, 7/11/1935, p. 23).
He also claimed in 1932 that he had detected particles from the Sun that "vastly exceeded the speed of light," which would be contrary to special relativity. (NYT, Letter to the Editor from Bergen Davis, Columbia University, 2/24/1932)
Both of these are relatively (pun) late in Tesla's life, and early in Einstein's own fame (Einstein's world fame took off in 1919, picked up again when he fled Germany in 1933, and then became gigantic after the atomic bombs in 1945)
None of us have ever seen a rocket go into spaceWhen we fire a rocket into space where does it go? Would seeing Earth's curvature from the top of Everest convince you? And if not why not?
Are all pilots in on this scam? Including a friend of mine?
Albert succeeded Telsa. Much like the scientists before him, it takes a great deal of experiments before they drop their skepticism.Alberto einstein was an actor that stole the majority of his "ideas" from actually intelligent scientists
The same Tesla that knew that general relativity was pseudoscience
nikka use your god damn eyes instead of believing what these lying academics say. Our eyes tell us the Sun and Moon are the same size. The solar eclipse just a few years ago all over America was clear proof of that.
But go ahead and believe them when they say the Sun is really 400 times bigger than the Moon and the only reason they look the same size is cause its 400 times further away from us than the Moon. Just think about the odds of that being true? Its impossible.
The more rational view is to simply trust our senses which tell us the Sun and Moon are the same size rather than the fantastically wild scenario of the Sun being exactly the same distance away from the Earth as it is bigger than the Moon.
Cell towers and high altitude balloons are responsible for gpsNope. The satellites have to take relativity into account. That was a famous problem once upon a time
Sadly, 24 pages later, this doesn't appear to be the case. :brutuswow:I’m glad nobody chose to try to debate the nonsense swag posted. Just laugh and move on.
Yes I haveYou need to care what every mid-distance and longer flying pilot says.
Pilots have to constantly adjust for the curvature of the earth.
On a flat earth doing so would result in traveling in a (non-straight) curve.
You read about physics so here you go: Geodesic - Wikipedia .
"In differential geometry, a geodesic (/ˌdʒiːəˈdɛsɪk, ˌdʒiːoʊ-, -ˈdiː-, -zɪk/[1][2]) is a curve representing in some sense the shortest path between two points in a surface, or more generally in a Riemannian manifold. It is a generalization of the notion of a "straight line" to a more general setting."
Similarly if you walk in a straight line at angle angle non-parallel to a line of longitude you eventually end up moving towards a pole. On a flat earth you would just walk off the edge. Pick any line of latitude and walk in a straight line east. You will eventually cross one of the bounding lines of latitude would would not happen on a flat surface.
As an aside (but while we are here) GPS only works if we compensate for the curvature of the earth (and relativity). On a flat earth this would not be required. That means that every programmer of GPS devices (the positioning code) has to be in on the scam as well right?
And also relative sizes of countries must also be lies. The current sizes map to a spheroid surface. Flatten that into a disk and the sizes change. You don't need to go to space to unearth the lie. Just measure landmass. This is the shape that would maintain current relative sizes (and shape).
@xCivicx have you answered the above questionS yet?
There definitely is not any evidence of any of thisThere's evidence of the moon, going to the moon, and being on the moon.
Again, the study of the atomic realm is no different than the study of space. Anything you ask me to believe about the atomic realm is as believable as what any of us ask you to believe in space. You can't observe molecules, atoms, protons, electrons, or quasars directly. You need specialized visual equipment just like you do with the Moon, planets, sun, or stars.
How would flying on a flat plane take longer than flying on a curved one?My bad if this has been addressed but...
If the earth is flat why did I fly out of LAX to Tokyo a while back and it was around 11 hours. On a flat earth map wouldn’t that flight take 3 times as long? Also if I use my phone with a gyroscope, I’m pretty sure it would say I’m traveling west.
I’m genuinely curious as to how a flat earth believer explains this.
Poor attempt at framing@Swagnificent
Here is one proof Einstein used for spacetime.
Gravitational lens - Wikipedia
Also
More recently we have
1. Clock test
Atomic clocks make best measurement yet of relativity of time
2. Muon decay
3. GPS
4. Gravitational Waves
--
You know what it is. Answers please
@hex as impartial observer