The Sony Pictures Leak F**kery Thread

E

EarlyMaridia

All Star
Joined
Feb 15, 2014
Messages
924
Reputation
290
Daps
2,691
Adam3000 said:
While I think its clear that no credible threat of violence exists, these theater chains and Paramount are probably shook of getting hacked and exposed which is a legitimate threat

I don't blame them, this is just a temporary moment in time and will blow over quickly. But getting hacked on Sony's level will have long lasting effects. Not worth the risk just in the name of making a 'fukk yeah, America home of the free' statement
Click to expand...

No doubt. Truth be told, trying to be a badass isn't even the priority, when some a$$hole might fukk around and choke on a nacho, then blame terrorism. lol. If one person got hurt watching The Interview or Team America, then it would be free money. Lawyers feeling like :noah:thinking about the mills.
 
George's Dilemma

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,794
Reputation
7,454
Daps
136,003
pickles said:
http://defamer.gawker.com/angelinas-cleopatra-catastrophe-the-other-side-of-sony-1671986317

:banderas::banderas::banderas:

So much fukkery here.
Click to expand...

:mjlol:

Scorcese to Direct Bald Angelina?

Cleopatra directed by Martin Scorsese and starring Angelina Jolie would be, in Pascal's improbable words, "the greatest movie ever." There's just one problem with the current script: Cleopatra is written—historically accurately—bald, and Jolie is a bit worried about the "sensuality":
The one thought I would ask you both is about her "bald". I think that made sense in earlier drafts but if we are saying every time she's in bed she has no hair or a shaved head it changes the sensuality. I wonder if we should keep it out and discuss as an idea with the director. But I worry we could scare off a director.
The point was always that she be clean and raw and I think with straight black hair and no make up we would achieve the same and not distract.
I make this point incase we are starting to send it out we should ask to remove that one description.
This is a non-issue for Rudin: " I think it's provocative. I don't think it's a turnoff." Jolie agrees to "leave it but its shaved head. Not bald. Let's at least make that clear. And for the record I find it sexy and am happy to be bold. Feels statuesque and clean." The question of whether or not Angelina Jolie should have hair playing a 40 B.C. queen literally keeps Rudin up at night:
First I thought bald but then I was sitting at home during the night and I couldn't sleep because of it so now I think shaved; Or possibly a fade like Kid 'n Play; Maybe shaved for Alexandria, bald for Rome? And then curly tendrils for the asp? What do you think?
:banderas:

Pascal shares his aesthetic concerns:
Well she was amazing with a perm in that Jewish movie about Daniel pearl. So I'm tempted to throw that look in somewhere but I don't think I can beat you can beat that kid n play look possibly with lots of pearls.
Regardless, the star herself wrote, "this is the film I am dying to make." She planned to call Scorcese later in the week.
 
pickles

pickles

Veteran
Joined
Aug 30, 2013
Messages
21,815
Reputation
4,326
Daps
64,963
Reppin
#Byrdgang
Endiphrint said:
:mjlol:

The question of whether or not Angelina Jolie should have hair playing a 40 B.C. queen literally keeps Rudin up at night:
First I thought bald but then I was sitting at home during the night and I couldn't sleep because of it so now I think shaved; Or possibly a fade like Kid 'n Play; Maybe shaved for Alexandria, bald for Rome? And then curly tendrils for the asp? What do you think?
:banderas:

Pascal shares his aesthetic concerns:
Well she was amazing with a perm in that Jewish movie about Daniel pearl. So I'm tempted to throw that look in somewhere but I don't think I can beat you can beat that kid n play look possibly with lots of pearls.
Regardless, the star herself wrote, "this is the film I am dying to make." She planned to call Scorcese later in the week.
Click to expand...

:russ: I was like :what: Kid n play?

:laughing: at ol'boy calling that Daniel Pearl movie, the Jewish movie. Tha fukk?:dahell:
 
Box Cutta

Box Cutta

Bumbling Sidekick
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
16,784
Reputation
2,369
Daps
39,481
Reppin
Sanitation Department
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2...tment-recruit-studio-chiefs-battle-terrorism/

Hollywood VS. ISIS! Secret Government Campaign To Fight Terrorism Through Studio Revealed In Latest Email Leak
Posted on Dec 18, 2014 @ 14:09PM

Celebrities such as Rob Lowe and Judd Apatow claim The Interview’s cancellation is a sign the terrorists have won. But meanwhile, RadarOnline.com has learned that the studio is secretly engaged in a high-stakes government campaign to battle such international threats. According to newly leaked Sony emails, the U.S. State Department recently recruited film studio chiefs to help fight global terrorism — and Sony was glad to pitch in.

“We have plenty of challenges in countering ISIL narratives in the Middle East and Russian narratives in central and eastern Europe,” U.S. Under Secretary of State Richard Stengel wrote in an October 15, 2014 e-mail to Sony CEO Michael Lynton. “In both cases, there are millions and millions of people in those regions who are getting a skewed version of reality. And it’s not something that the State Department can do on its own by any means.”

The diplomat asked the Sony chief to help recruit other film studio executives to “help us think about better ways to respond to both of these large challenges” through entertainment. Their involvement could lead to “commercial possibilities” and would be “rewarding” for the studios, Stengel promised.

By November, the Sony Pictures chairman had recruited 21st Century Fox exec James Murdoch, Walt Disney Chairman Andy Bird, Game Show Network CEO David Goldhill and former TBS chief Phil Kent. “Is that enough for you?” he asked the State Department.

Could the close relationship between Lynton and Stengel be a clue as to who at the State Department endorsed The Interview’s ending — the assassination of North Korea’s Kim Jong-Un? The Sony chief wrote in an earlier e-mail that it has the support of “someone very senior in State” who he spoke to confidentially.
Click to expand...


shyt like this is why....I can't even blame NK for doing this.

People still believe "it's just a movie"? People still don't think these things matter? People still don't see the propaganda?

Where are these people like Sorkin and Kimmel commenting on THESE leaks? It's more than just petty Hollywood business chatter....

Wonder if the State Department was trying to work with Hollywood to counter Ferguson-narratives?

Look at movies like this.... :

RvDFwN9.jpg


....and look at these emails.

Hope they keep the leaks coming.
 
hex

hex

Super Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
37,654
Reputation
18,327
Daps
189,200
detroitwalt said:
You're missing the point. It doesn't even have NK that does it, just some random clown. You know this country is full of idiots that would do something just on some copycat type shyt.

Hell the Aurora theater and Cinemark are getting sued over the Dark Knight shootings, so yes, it is possible and any theater that has an incident while this movie is showing would be sued to hell and back and no one is going to risk that
Click to expand...

I'm sure they're getting sued but every theater in America didn't pull the movie because they thought a Joker wannabe was gonna shoot up the movie.

If you think this is a good idea or "understandable", where do you draw the line?

Do you realize how many movies come out each year that thousands of people have problems with? Due to content....sex, violence, religious themes, language....whatever. Now imagine this same scenario playing out every time, and you'll see my problem with letting this shyt slide, even once.

Fred.
 
thenatural

thenatural

Superstar
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
8,740
Reputation
1,061
Daps
27,495
Box Cutta said:
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2...tment-recruit-studio-chiefs-battle-terrorism/




shyt like this is why....I can't even blame NK for doing this.

People still believe "it's just a movie"? People still don't think these things matter? People still don't see the propaganda?

Where are these people like Sorkin and Kimmel commenting on THESE leaks? It's more than just petty Hollywood business chatter....

Wonder if the State Department was trying to work with Hollywood to counter Ferguson-narratives?

Look at movies like this.... :

RvDFwN9.jpg


....and look at these emails.

Hope they keep the leaks coming.
Click to expand...

All of this shyt is fascinating.

Just read this article about how the MPAA are trying to spin this into reviving SOPA.

http://variety.com/2014/digital/new...aign-in-wake-of-sony-cyber-attack-1201382896/

Then there's the angle of the gov't. being clueless about who started this but implying NK for fear and ultimately, legislative purposes.
 
The Watcher

The Watcher

Judging you from afar
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Messages
921
Reputation
250
Daps
3,137
Reppin
Peepholes
The_King_of_Everything

The_King_of_Everything

Yeah.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
32,692
Reputation
2,900
Daps
71,376
Reppin
Yeah
Box Cutta said:
http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2...tment-recruit-studio-chiefs-battle-terrorism/




shyt like this is why....I can't even blame NK for doing this.

People still believe "it's just a movie"? People still don't think these things matter? People still don't see the propaganda?

Where are these people like Sorkin and Kimmel commenting on THESE leaks? It's more than just petty Hollywood business chatter....

Wonder if the State Department was trying to work with Hollywood to counter Ferguson-narratives?

Look at movies like this.... :

RvDFwN9.jpg


....and look at these emails.

Hope they keep the leaks coming.
Click to expand...
YOOOOOOO THIS shyt RIGHT HERE IS HUGE!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top