When you look at the facts from both sides of the case and not the bias stuff the media puts out, the case is not as cut and dry as ppl think
Blood was planted. Furhman was asked straight up if he planted or tampered with any evidence and he pleaded the 5th. Blood evidence makes up damn near the whole case against o.j.
The "cut" on ojays finger by all accounts happened sometime in Chicago. The limo driver (probably the most honest witness) said he saw no cut on oj's finger at any time during their ride and he admitted to shaking his hand. Oj also was signing autographs at the airport
The killings looked like they were done by a professional. Still hard for me to believe a first time rookie killer stabbed and killed 2 ppl so viciously without anybody hearing or seeing him, and disposed of the murder weapon with such ease.
I still don't understand the motive behind this. Oj had his own broad. Oj been knowing she's a hoe. Saw her give head to another man and never touched either of em. Homie had a flight to catch. Why was his reason for even going over there?
The biggest thing against oj is my opinion is the bloody shoe print
The whole shyt is just insane. I understand why ppl are so obsessed with it. I wouldn't be surprised if oj stopped by, saw them dead, and got the fukk outta there
He knows something he ain't saying but I still have doubts be actually killed her. Goldman IS a underrated wild card in all of this. I know he was going to get some puss but because everyone was focused on oj, everyone pretty much ignored that he was into some shady stuff himself. He coulda very easily been followed