“in the air” doesn’t necessarily mean “straight up in the air”
The official ‘Tory Lanez vs Megan Thee Stallion’ trial thread.
- Thread starter Danny Ocean
- Start date
Apprentice
RIP Doughboy Roc
And fr fr I take that back yall not even retarded, that’s disrespectful to retards
Y’all jus stupid and loud fr it’s curable tho hopefully
Right. This so why people are so dumb nowadays. The average person doesn’t even read past the headline.People trying to use his credentials to lead credence to his coverage. Him being a lawyer is of no significance if he doesn’t work on these types of cases. He’s just another dude with a twitter account.
And furthermore this is a reporters job. Being a lawyer doesn’t make him better at reporting than the professional reporter. This would be like the reporter lady coming to one of his court hearings and trying to do a cross exam.
Dude is a clout chaser, period
People have no media literacy.
EzekelRAGE
Superstar
The only way this hurts Tory is if ppl are taking the wrong things from what a majority of the ppl who reported on what Kelly testified to.
Prosecution tried to imply Tory beat Kelsey.
--Kelsey denied that
--Kelly said Kelsey and Meg fought violently
Meg said she was never in a fight that night:
--See Kelly's testimony
Tory's Defense is Kelsey shot Meg:
--Kelly's testimony said Kelsey let off several shots before her and Tory wrestled for the gun, then heard more shots.
All the above helps Tory.
"In the Air" Comment
-- Helps Tory, no matter how you slice it. Kelly didnt say he saw Tory shooting at the ground towards Meg's feet.
He got 3 charges
Assault with a gun
Carrying loaded unregistered Gun in a vehicle
Discharging a firearm with gross negligence
- Kellys testimony helps with first charge
- EJ's testimony helped with 2nd charge. He laid it out there that Kelsey packed her own bag and it was in the trunk that night before they left. Pictures show the bag is where Tory/Kelsey were sitting.
- Third charge will be dicey.
MicIsGod
They like what that mean
the same lady that said Tory was jury tampering because somebody outside was recording him or some shyt?
Her spin is just more professional. Nobody is leaving their opinion out of this.
CreepyMcCreeperson
Veteran
Why do I have a feeling “Jamal” and “Mr. White” don’t exist?
EzekelRAGE
Superstar
Exactly, it's confusing as hell, especially the follow up with "the comment came after firing everywhere"
Don’t reply then nikka
. The LSAT is four sections with logical reasoning and logic game and questions like that. It isn’t really teaching you about law.
The bar exam is also just basic general questions about other fields of the law. Their classes are very specialized and unless you work in that actual field (criminal law or IP/patents or immigration) to know the ins and outs of that particular field then it ain’t really helping you.
Source: 2 friends in law school
Rembrandt
the artist
Are you hiring a divorce lawyer over a criminal lawyer to help you beat a bid?
You're arguing bullshyt bro bro
You are doing the pick and chose thing here. where you only take the portion you want. I’ll help you.
I guess you are doing a good job at being one of Tory’s lawyers
Kelly also said two men were beating the breaks off a woman he thought they were trying to kill her, and He saw a man dragging a woman by her hair
He said the shots that appeared to come from a woman were aimed into the car. He also said the man himself let off 5 shots. The physical evidence contradicts all of his claims about who shot where and when except for the 5 shots he claims came from a male in which he then saw a female crawling and toward the car as a man screamed obscenities toward her.
Only when you leave out half of what the guy actually said.
The physical evidence proves meg got shot. None of the shots this guy described were “toward the ground” so arguing over where he says the gun was pointed is irrelevant. We know it was aimed at/near her feat cause she got shot
Again, only if you take out half of what they said, which is precisely what Tory’s lawyers tried to do.
I guess you are doing a good job at being one of Tory’s lawyers
Last edited:
EzekelRAGE
Superstar
What point are you making? You seem to be missing his point.
Are you hiring a reporter to help you beat a bid?
His occupation was brought up because they brought up the lady being a journalist/reporter as credibility. He is just as credible to post about the trial as her because he is a lawyer. The other ppl were saying "he this certain type of lawyer"..........and he still a lawyer and that doesnt disqualify him from reporting his notes on the case.
Bruh lol. LSAT has nothing to do with the law. Bar exam, yes you are tested on all areas of law. But once you start practicing, most lawyers spealize in one/a few areas of law, and don’t remember/know other areas of law that well. I’m a lawyer btw and i don’t pratice criminal law, and don’t know much about it other than a surface level understanding which i remember from law school/the bar exam.
Rembrandt
the artist
His occupation was brought up because he was using it as position of authority on this case. Him being a lawyer doesn't mean his reporting holds more weight considering it's not his field.
She never implied tory was tampering with anyone. All the conspiracy stuff has come from elsewhere.the same lady that said Tory was jury tampering because somebody outside was recording him or some shyt?
nikkas just making shyt up now